EV1 Servers CEO Responds To Customers
Retalin writes "EV1 CEO Robert Marsh gave his customer base a written explanation for the purchase of his decision to purchase a SCO License late last night. The most interesting quote was this:
"It has been argued by a Linux Journal reporter that I have essentially called the various GPL Linux developers plaugerists. This is false as I would never make such a claim against them. They are some of the brightest minds for whom I hold a great deal of respect.""
... a written explanation for the purchase of his decision to purchase a SCO License...
Ah hah! So it's true! SCO bribed him into doing it!
What? Just a typo? Oh... uh... right. I knew that.
What an itiod! It's people like him who give snodware delevellers a bad mane.
--- Yx3 = Delilah ---
Can't speak for you, but I would be most upset if someone called me a plaugerist. Not sure what that is but it just sounds dirty.
'Plaugerists'? Now, if he'd accused them of plagiarism he might have had a point, but to accuse them of supporting Dinkumware is a bizarre move indeed!
Curse those plaugerists, with their Standard Template Libraries and their cheery Australian charm...
Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
"Certain"? Did SCO actually tell them what IP they are licensing?
I thought not.
Now I know EV1 is a pushover, I have sent them letters in the name of my company advising them that an unknown but substantial piece of software that they are running infringes on my IP
I cannot reveal the nature of this software, but my company and I have identified thousands of pieces of it running on EV1's servers.
As EV1 have not indicated to me that they are not running such software (and as with SCO, the burden of proof is obviously on EV1 duh) then I have no option but to request the payment of $1599 per deployment of my IP on their systems. This comes to a total of $65,900,000 (some of their machines are running multiple instances of my IP).
All fees will be waived if they provide proof they are not running my IP, which I do not believe they will be able to do. I expect payment within 90 days. If payment is received, I will not take legal action against EV1.
(yeah I'm joking but damn, how far can protection rackets go once the weak cave in)
It is a big deal. SCO is basically now running a protection racket, and these folks knuckled under. That is fundamentally wrong.
"Then they came up with what they called the Other Other Operation, in which they would threaten to sue a Linux user if he did not buy a license. This, for the Piran^H^H^H^H^HMcBride brothers, was the turning point."
That sounds to me like high praise, and that's the fair dinkum.
It's nice to know that the GPL Linux programmers are reading the C++ Programmers' Journal, programming on purpose, and following the elements of programming style.
I hope they'll all keep Plauging away at it.
"How to Do Nothing," kids activities, back in print!
I hope he'll sue SCO for the price of his worthless licenses after SCO loses it's IBM case. :)
Less look fast, more go fast.
What they did is called CYA.
CowardlY Acquiescence?
Capitulate to Yammering Assholes?
Maybe EV1 should invest in a good Administrative Assistant:
"Actually, Mr. Marsh, it's spelled 'p-l-a-g-i-a-r-i-s-m.'"
"Perhaps, Mr. Marsh, we should wait and see whether SCO survives their suit with IBM."
"No, Mr. Marsh, I don't think this email is from a real exiled Nigerian Prince."
SCO already has like $60 million on hand and our small fee would not go very far defending an action such as this, much less prosecuting one.
"dude, they've got, like, way more money than that, so like, we figured it was like cool and stuff."
SCO or no SCO, I wouldn't want to do business with a company whose CEO has the spelling and diction of a twelve-year-old sk8r.
I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
Brief, to the point. I like it!
--
What short sigs we have -
One hundred and twenty chars!
Too short for haiku.
I heard that yesterday he was pimping around with Mr
McBribe at some conference. That seems like a guy with the Linux community good will in mind. If I had just been extorted out of a million dollars the last thing I would do is follow around the CEO with my lips attached to his ass.
Got Code?
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. I certainly learned a lot from P. J. Plauger's books, not least The Elements of Programming Style (co-written, of course, with Brian W. ``Water-Buffalo'' Kernighan). Does that make me a Plaugerist?
--
What short sigs we have -
One hundred and twenty chars!
Too short for haiku.
Shame he didn't use his brain instead.
--
What short sigs we have -
One hundred and twenty chars!
Too short for haiku.
Excerpt from the second page of the thread:
...
:)
"If this was a publicity stunt then it's probably not a very good one, considering that now most slashdotters are going to be vehemently against EV1, so while they'll get the traffic it won't be translating into sales for the most part (it may for some, not all slashdotters hate SCO, but I imagine it's a fairly small percentage of the total)."
There... is... evil... among us!
We must hunt down the dogs and purge the SCO supporters!
Okay done.
EV1 has become famous as a porn hosting site:
Well, at least now I know *why* I only pay $12/month (after "fees") for dialup: My surfing is subsidized by porn.
If you plugged that into a spreadsheet, wouldn't that be a "circular reference"?
Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
No, Plaugerists are of course the followers of C++ guru P. J. Plauger.
I hate to have to remind you of Godwin's Law (I really do think this was a boneheaded move on EV1's part), but...