Slashdot Mirror


Chernobyl...18 Years Later

abysmilliard writes "A young Ukrainian woman has posted a photo journal of her motorcycle rides through Chernobyl and the area surrounding it. Included are pictures of the now-emptied city, maps of current radiation levels, and a discussion of how the area has changed. While the english is quite broken, it's often rather surreal, as well, with quotes like, 'I don't know how sound the silence to those tourists that they can not stand it, but to me after hitting a red line on my bike tacho it sound like all those ghosts cursing 1100cc kawasaki engin.'"

36 of 971 comments (clear)

  1. Gamma World by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The essay was absolutely amazing. The surreal description is perfect, reminding me of apocalyptic movies of the 80's and describing what I imagined the world looking like in the RPG Gamma World. Abandoned buildings as people left them, houses falling apart, yet seeing scenes of prezwalski looking horses crossing a stream.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Gamma World by WuphonsReach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the weird thing about the place. It's considered basically uninhabitable by humans. Yet nature as a whole seems entirely unfazed by the radition and is thriving in the absence of humans.

      Yeah, but nature doesn't get all sentimental or up-in-arms if critters are born with birth defects or die early from cancer. As long as the critters live long enough to reproduce at a growing rate, then that's all that's needed.

      Humans are a bit pickier about that pesky "quality of life" issue.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:Gamma World by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A lot of very sensitive studies have found little or no impact on wildlife from the radiation.
      So long as you completely ignore any actual studies, like the one on the moles, it would be easy to come to that conclusion. Google should help and be more informative.
  2. one phrase... by flynns · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I read this, and I look at the pictures, and all I can think, numbly, is "...holy shit..."

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    1. Re:one phrase... by Nf1nk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I felt the same way. and at the same time it reminded me of the ghost towns in the sierras that I have visited. there too you feel unnerved by the silence and the items just left sitting there unmoved for decades, and the odd decay that they undergo.

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  3. Re:It's a lesson by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The disaster was a damn good example of bad mix of technology, science and politics. Boy, don't we have plenty of that in the U.S.

    Not to meantion that the system had little to no foresight that humans would be using it. When it started overheating the alarms went off full steam and the workers got scared and threw all of the rods into the core. (The rods are supposed to slow down the reaction.) Well, since the core was so hot, the rods started reacting inside of the reactor and _increased_ the temperature.

    The moral of this story is that there is no moral. All great system failures or any other "big" event never is caused by the apparent singular event right before the shit hit the fan.

  4. I've been to Ukraine... by anzha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been to Ukraine 3 times in the past 2 years: my gf is of Ukrainian extraction. Chernobyl is a name to conjure demons with there. Even more so than in the West. What's even scarier is that the Ukrainian government's denial over the state that it is in. They still are running at least a couple of the reactors and they are not being terribly maintained. The Russians came out stating that the buildings that the reactors are in are about to collapse...yet the Ukrainian government is unwilling to shut the place down.

    Expect a sequel there, folks, and it's gonna be just as ugly if not worse. To make matters even more horrifying, based on the behavior of the Ukrainian government, the people are going to be informed through western sources long before, but far too late even so, that anything wrong is happening there when it does.

    Note I say when, not if. I really mean it too.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  5. Re:It's a lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't believe some girl's photo album was the single greatest link I have ever read off slashdot. And it wasn't even M$ or SCO related. Incredible.

  6. Re:Like the American southwest by BWJones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not exactly sure, but there must have been some combination of bright light and higher energy radiation. From a retinal vision perspective, all one would need to do would be to activate opsins and this could easily be imagined happening with all of the high energy particles being emitted by the bomb.

    Also, a quick google search reveals that others have relayed the same experience.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  7. Before anyone starts trolling... by ZuperDee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I realize this might be slightly off-topic, since I don't think this article really discusses the any of the dangers/merits (or lack thereof) of nuclear power in the first place. However, I know that all the same, some people are going to try to bring it up, so before anyone starts trolling about how dangerous nuclear power is, I just thought I'd point out:

    1) Chernobyl was based on very old technology. Nuclear power is much safer today.

    2) France gets >80% of its power from nuclear sources. Nuclear power is one of the cleanest sources of energy in the world. (I have nothing against fossil fuels, either--at the moment NOTHING has proven as economical. But I do think ultimately, we will have to find alternatives, and nuclear power is certainly a viable option.)

    3) It is my opinion that the worst part of Chernobyl was the way the communist regime tried to keep it a secret, until they found out that it was just so big they simply couldn't keep it a secret anymore. Sure, many other governments in the world (and I am NOT naming any ones in particular) have also been forced to fess up to things later, but that is NOT an excuse. The Russian government was truly evil, and I will not retract that statement, as long as I live.

    1. Re:Before anyone starts trolling... by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Nuclear power is one of the cleanest sources of energy in the world.


      Assuming the plant is well run, never attacked by terrorists, and the nuclear waste it generates never leaks into the environment. And if any of those things DO happen... well, 48,000 years is a rather long time to wait before you can move back home...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Before anyone starts trolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When a nuclear plant rotates out its used fuel and rotates in unused fuel, where does the spent fuel go? You know exactly where it is.

      When fossil fuels are used, where do they go? In the air. In the water. In the ground. No "ifs" about it. They DO get into our environment. With nuclear power, we can keep a tight lid on where the fuel goes and prevent it from getting out. And if we didn't have so many people who wrongfully hate nuclear power, the United States could reprocess fuel so there would be less waste. But, unfortunately, we Americans are collectively assholes about it.

  8. Re:Nuclear technology has always been a nightmare by Chmarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because, one day, we are going to run out of fossil fuels, and one day, our energy needs will be greater than that possible by covering the available areas of the Earth with solar energy collectors.

    Nuclear power is dirty, but... unless we use and research it NOW, it'll always stay dirty. Coal plants, while still emitting pollution, are MUCH more efficient and much LESS polluting than they were 50 years ago.

  9. I Have to say by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That this was the most eye opening thing I have seen linked on /. in a long time. Really makes all the SCO and Ipod stuff seem kinda small. I mean that was one of the most surreal things I have experienced in a long time.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  10. Re:angelfire? by Bonker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a site worth mirroring. It's a history lesson. 50-100-500 years from now, people will be referring to archives of that sight to give people an impression of what Chernobyl did.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  11. Do you have any evidence? by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The sheer calous lack of regulation of these pollutants by governments world-wide is unbelievable. Even your fabric-softener can have mercury put in it.


    Wow, welcome to the 1940's. Where have you been in this last half century? I'd say the furious over-regulation by governments world-wide is unbelievable. For instance, I now have to recycle the few micro-grams of mercury contained in fluorescent lamps and batteries. Do you know what's the biggest cause of cancer in humans due to chemicals? Salt. Sodium chloride, that is. Do you know what's the biggest cause of cancer due to radiation? Sunshine. Do you know what's the second biggest cause of cancer after tobacco? Obesity. Don't believe my words, ask any oncologist. No, the biggest environmental threat to humans isn't either radiation or chemicals, it's ignorance, stupidity, and paranoia.

    1. Re:Do you have any evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if your claims were true, one has to consider that the regulation may be working. The reason we don't see thousands of people dying from mercury poisoning is because they don't have the opportunity.

  12. Slashdot Effect? No... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5, Insightful
    linking to a 10+ page site full of photos on angelfire? yeah, that'll last long...

    Naaa, this is Slashdot. The story has nothing to do with games, SCO, the latest video card benchmark, or esoteric science. Therefor, it should last fairly well.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  13. Mayak - another nightmare that lives on... by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The whole "what do we do with nuclear waste" thing is way overblown."

    No, it's not overblown at all. I can deal with a lot of things but this is one that I don't want in MY backyard!

    It doesn't take much of this radioactive shit to cause a serious disaster. I agree with using something like Yuca Mt. to store it all in but even this has problems.

    1) Transportation. Getting it there will be more than half the fun. What if there's an accident on the way in? Which town along the way will become the next Chernobyl?

    2) Possible environmental consequences. Things like water table contamination are a real concern.

    3) Natural disasters. A sudden earthquake or volcanic activity could certainly ruin your day.
    Can you predict the future for 10,000+ years? That's how long a site would need to remain stable.

    Of course, where it's all stored now is a bigger nightmare because it can hardly be protected - particularly from terrorists. Then there's the waste of the plants themselves. I haven't heard any real info on what to do with a decomissioned plant yet other than just 'leave it lay'. Not good at all.

    I'm not nuke-phobic, but I am realistic about man - an imperfect being handling something that you simply CANNOT make a mistake about.

    The sad thing is, this is hardly the first time this sort of thing has happened. I don't usually support Greenpeace, but check this info out about the city of Mayak since a nuclear disaster. These people still LIVE THERE! Some of the pictures in their image gallery are quite disturbing:

    http://archive.greenpeace.org/mayak/index.html

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  14. There is something sad and beautiful by azav · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is something sad and beautiful about being to look into a land that has been poisoned and shut down from the other side of the world.

    It is eerie that a beautiful young woman would be our guide. Eerie that she would chronicle this deadened scene for us to view while enjoying the freedom it gives her, well aware of the danger and of those who died and still suffer the effects of the worst nuclear disaster the world has ever known.

    As I slouch back in my chair, well aware of the life around me in this chilly San Francisco evening, it becomes clear that sometimes the internet offers us too much.

    Safe passage Lena.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:There is something sad and beautiful by demonbug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to nitpick, and I completely agree with how powerful the imagery is (and the sentiment you express), but the Japanese might disagree about Chernobyl being "the worst nuclear disaster the world has ever known."
      Disasters can happen on purpose, too.

  15. Most moving thing I have ever seen! by f1ipf10p · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This double true.

    She is, I am very certain, very fast moving on that ZX-11.

    More so moving, I have perhaps never been so humbled as a human being as viewing her site. It should be praised. Insight into one of human kind's saddest tragedies that I rarely think one person has, and she can convey it to others so completely.

    Thanks. I learned a lot more from her site than I expected to by following that link.

    --
    ~8^]
  16. Re:Weird -- and intriguing by rampant+mac · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "First of all, this should very much be an example of the terrors, not of nuclear power per se, but of nuclear war. With a war-happy president, this is all the more scary."

    If you're interested in that sort of thing, you shouldn't be looking at Chernobyl as an example, you should be fact-finding Nagasaki and Hiroshima. _Those_ are examples of nuclear devastation during wartime; Chernobyl was the result of an nuclear accident involving a power plant reactor meltdown. Quite a different situation.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  17. Re:the playground is scary by Jellybob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    [Shudders]

    Shit... I watched that film in science at school... everyone spent the week beforehand getting all excited, because another class had seen it, and told us about how crazy it was.

    For the second half, we had no teacher, because she'd gone to do anything but watch it... I don't think anybody ate that lunch time.

    It's some scary, scary shit, but if you can handle that, well worth watching.

    There was also one recently by the BBC about smallpox, which was disturbing, but not in quite such an extreme way.

  18. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by mindriot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry to say this, but the fact that on such a story -- which is highly interesting and moving at the same time --, the first five comments are (+5, Funny) ones, makes me feel rather sad.

    Anyway, these are great pictures. Most people have forgotten about Tchernobyl now -- I bet practically everyone thinks that life is just going on there normally by now. The pictures show us the dangers of working with nuclear energy -- one small mistake, and the whole region is doomed for a long time, far beyond the lifetime of a single human. If this doesn't teach us a lesson about safety and security, I don't know what will.

  19. There Will Come Soft Rains by MattTC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground,
    And swallows circling with their shimmering sound;

    And frogs in the pools singing at night,
    And wild plum trees in tremulous white;

    Robins will wear their feathery fire,
    Whistling their whims on a low fence-wire;

    And not one will know of the war, not one
    Will care at last when it is done.

    Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree,
    If mankind perished utterly;

    And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn
    Would scarcely know that we were gone."

    --Sara Teasdale

    --
    --"You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think."
  20. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by torpor · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Yeah, me too. Stupid piss-taking jokes about an event that goes beyond the realm of experience of any one of the lives of a small group of people currently sitting on their ass in a comfy place, reading a website called /. in sanctity and relative haven.

    Prosperity does not give one the right to degrade another persons experience ... Chernobyl is no laughing matter, even still to this day, for a lot of people.

    And before anyone pulls out the ol' "get over it, its only a joke" excuse, let me just say that jokes have their time and place.

    The Chernobyl incident was a completely different time, in a completely different place. If this site was hosted in Russia, and the jokes were about American disasters, how many of you would consider them to be flame-bait, or make a noise about how 'inappropriate' it is?

    Ridicule aint no compliment, and it aint no reflection.

    That said, I hope that the generations yet to come understand that the generation currently alive are sorry for what they did to the future, with Chernobyl.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  21. Much-hyped? I don't think so by Helge9210 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The much-hyped 100,000 excess cancers have not appeared.

    Is it so? Tell me than, why my friends, relatives, friends of relatives, and relatives of friends have died or are dying because of cancer?

  22. So tiresome... by iion_tichy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever Chernobyl is mentioned, there are always those people eager to explain why it doesn't matter, because the same thing couldn't happen with more advanced reactors. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure....

    Of course the SAME thing couldn't happen. But other things could/will/do. Anyone who is an engineer knows that, as there simply are no perfect fail-safe systems.

    Here in germany people were also priding themselves about their fail-safe reactors, especiually compared to Chernobyl. But then along came 9/11, and they wondered what would happen if a Jumbo Jet would crash on the nuclear power plant. No, the shielding wouldn't hold - the best idea they come up with now is to use fog bombs to make the plant invisible. Like that's going to make a difference with GPRS available.

    You know, the nature of such catstrophies is that they come in a way nobody has thought of before. Of course Chernobyl has been analyzed over and over, and people won't make the SAME mistakes. But you bet they'll make OTHER mistakes. To deny that is just being in denial.

    1. Re:So tiresome... by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Insightful
      As far as I remember, there were concerns about aircrafts before 9/11, and german power plants have the concrete shield as well.

      After 9/11 there were concerns about all kinds of things. There were concerns about arab-looking people having graduation parties on their lawns. Post-9/11 concerns have remarkably little to do with the real world.

      But maybe they only thought of smaller aircrafts. Steel-inforced concrete maybe sounds good from the point of view of human being, consisting largely out of soft material like water. Jumbo Jets might be less impressed.

      This isn't theoretical, it's been tested. Not with a jumbo jet, but with a rocket-propelled F-4 Phantom. It's smaller than a large airliner, but it has larger engines, and it's the engines that have real penetrating power. Don't make the mistake of comparing with the WTC; those buildings were mostly open space and were not designed to take any kind of impact.

      And what about those new rockets the US developed to penetrate bunkers 12m below rock?

      What about them? There's no way a terrorist would get ahold of one of those. I'm not saying there's no way to breach a reactor's containment. However, with most methods of doing so, whatever breaches the containment is likely to be as dangerous to the surrounding countryside as the containment breach itself.

      it is possible to design nuclear reactors which have no physical way of exploding or melting down.

      interesting point, although surely a power plant contains more energy than a PC, so it seems less obvious to me why the explosion couldn't be big enough to blow up my house. So how is it supposed to work? Is there some kind of feedback loop to decrease the activity the hotter it gets (or whatever, I am no nuclear scientist)? Does that loop work without extra controlers, which might have been destroyed in the case of an accident?


      Yes, it's possible to make a reactor which reacts less as it gets warmer, without any systems at all. Building a reactor isn't a matter of just piling enriched uranium together until you have enough of it in one place. (You can, but it's really inefficient and nobody actually does.) Instead, you have a very complex system involving enriched uranium, moderators, neutron reflectors, etc. which all have to be in exactly the right position for anything to happen. When stuff heats up, it expands, and it's possible to make it so that this expansion makes the reactor less reactive. Even ignoring that, once the reactor heats up to a certain point, things will start to bend and break, which will knock everything completely out of position and the reaction will stop right away. The China Syndrome (a core melting and sinking to the center of the earth because it keeps itself out) is basically impossible.

      Chernobyl was also like this, in fact it's hard to make a reactor that isn't. The giant mistakes in Chernobyl was that it didn't have a containment structure, and it used graphite as the moderator. Graphite is carbon, and carbon burns really nicely. What happened was that the reactor core heated up extremely and set the graphite on fire. That fire threw large pieces of the core into the atmosphere. The way to keep similar accidents from happening is simple: don't put highly-flammable substances in your reactor core! With a sane reactor design, you could even breach the containment dome and nothing really terrible would happen because all of the nasty substances will still stay in one place, absent a large quantity of explosives or flammable substances.
      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:So tiresome... by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thanks for your infos, but I am not fully convinced yet. It seems to me you are mostly making the old point, that an accident like Chernobyl couldn't happen in modern plants. My point was that other things can happen, that we didn't take into consideration yet.

      Fair enough. But I would like to point out that doubting the safety of nuclear power in general because of a single accident, while simultaneously not understanding how nuclear power works from an engineering and physics standpoint, is foolish. Nitrate-based explosives have killed more people than nuclear power and nuclear weapons ever have, but I don't see people subsequently doubting the safety of their nitrate-based fertilizers. What I see is, people are frightened of nuclear power because they don't understand it and they can only imagine the bad, and I don't feel this is justified. Please don't take this as a personal insult, I mean this as something I see in people in general.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  23. Touching by alex_tibbles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty amazing stuff. The desertion so nearly complete. The suffering and loss of life. The fact that the evacuation was so late.
    I found it strange that the tourists who went to the ghost town were disappointed that it was so quiet! I would have thought that was the point.
    Great stuff! To be commended.
    She did admit that radio-activity on the roads she travelled is still many times normal background. I hope her dad knows his safe doses well...

  24. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by DieByWire · · Score: 5, Insightful
    TMI would have failed safe, except for incorrect operator intervention.

    Exactly. Which is why our next reactors will have only infallible humans operating them.

    Oh, wait.... our next reactors will have only infallible computers operating them.

    Dang! Wait... our next computers will have only infallible humans programming them.

    Wait...

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
  25. Re:Quiet Town? by grazzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I live in sweden, we were too affected by chernobyl, I must say I find it very disturbing when people like you makes a comment like this about a non-native english speakers english, especially when the linked article is such a honest and sad story.

    The moderators modding this up as funny are probably the same modding me down when I wonder why there are 1000+ people being kept without a trial in Cuba.

  26. So, you think it's a laughing matter, do you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If you think the world is there for your amusement, grow up.

    I gather from your Web site that you are from the U.S.

    Do you think that the September 11 attacks are a joking matter? Those attacks killed thousands; the effects of Chernobyl may have killed 300,000 if one accepts an estimate from a U.K. charity. The radiation of Chernobyl spread across multiple countries. -- I remember news reports reporting radiation tracked all the way to northern Finland ; radiation was tracked to Central Europe and the Mediterranean .

    I entered college 90 minutes' drive east of Three Mile Island in the Fall of 1979. The campus was still on edge because of the accident and uncertainty about its long-term effects -- because weather can go from west to east there....

    Links that may be useful rather than callously "funny:"

    Zeal.com search on Chernobyl

    www.chernobyl.info English-language pages

    Chernobyl Charities U.K. page on book Voices from Chernobyl

  27. My Uncle Was In Chernobyl And He Survived It by $criptah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My uncle was a member of one of the first rescue teams that were sent to Chernobyl after the disaster. This might be slightly off topic, but if you think that the pictures of the empty city are disturbing, take a look at people who were there after the tragic event.

    I hate a lot of things about my former country, the Soviet Union, and its leaders. One of the things that I hated the most was the fact that people were never told the truth. In May of 1986 my uncle was told that he had to go to Chernobyl to help patch things up. Since he was a memeber of an elite task team that was a part of chemical forces, a special unit within the Soviet Army, he had no other options. He went there in May and he spent some quality time there. His major task was to drive tons of cement to a helicopter that would drop it off on the damaged reactor.

    The not-so-funny thing was that nobody who was in my uncle's shoes knew what was going on there. The superior officers, had to tweak radiation meters down so nobody could find out the real level of radiation. People did not have proper protection, tools to work with; moreover, the Soviet leaders did try to play things down a notch. Afterall, how could a superpower have a major disaster?

    Out of all of my uncle's rescue team, only a dozen or so people are alive now. All of them are disabled. My uncle has problems with his eyes and due to this fact he had to quit his job: he was a professional photographer. The Ukranian government pays him a small pension, not enough to buy food for a week. His immune system got reduced down to 60% of what he used to have. Still, he's better than his son. My cousin's system is 40% of the normal level. I remember reading a newspaper about a woman who had to buy a bottle of vodka every day. She did it because her husband could not surive through pain without it. Just as my uncle, he was in Chernobyl trying to fix the Soviet problem without exposing it to the rest of the world. That guy was lucky. His kids had been born before he went to Chernobyl. You won't believe how many stories I've heard when people just wanted to die without pain and suffering.

    Finally, here is a surprise for you. Chernobyl is not the only empty city. In fact, if you want to see more of them, you should travel to southern Belarus. See, due to the winds and the rain that happened right after the disaster, most of the radiation that escaped in Chernobyl ended up miles away in the neighboring state. In fact, Belarus recieved more damage than the Ukraine due to the wind pattern for that day. Most of the winds blew from the Ukraine straight into my motherland and the damage was done. I was lucky. Although I was in the rain that day, most of the radiation passed around my town. However, many towns received a solid amount of radiated water but the government did not do anything until it was late. As I said above, the government did everything it could to cover up the problem.

    We were told to burn our clothing and take a shower. That is it. That was the f*cking Soviet solution to the problem. Months later dozens of small towns were evacuated. People left leaving everything behind in hopes that they would return. Return my ass. The only people who returned were either looters or bums who scored nice houses where they could live. Years later, after the Soviet regime had collapsed, some reporters were providing us with information places that were emptied out. Most of these places are still there. They are a real time machine. If you go there, you'll see pretty much everything as it was in late 80's. Pictures of those places are distrubing, but not as bad as pictures of kids with cancer or disabilities due to the Chernobyl disaster. As for me, I am afraid of having a child myself. Who knows what got inside of me during that f*cking rain... All I know is that some of my friends started to develop problems already.

    Have a nice day.