jschauma writes "It appears that, unlike many other Open Source projects, NetBSD did not find any serious problems
with the much-debated license change of XFree86 4.4.0: it was just imported
into the tree."
Well, since the dispute was about weather or not the new XFree86 licens was GPL-compatable, and NetBSD isn't under the GPL, you wouldn't expect them to have a problem.
At least one BSD is unhappy about the prospect of the new license and is threatening to fork. Hopefully everyone can get together and have a single fork with a license like the older X license if it does end up coming to a fork.
-- And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
Can someone explain why open source projects are rejecting the new XFree86 license? I looked it over and it looked OK to me, at least for BSD-licensed projects.
FreeBSD will too, probably
by
marcovje
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I saw several comments on the freebsd-ports list that the FreeBSD troops see no problem in the adoption either.
The reason was also the same, clientside libs seem to go free.
Well, since the dispute was about weather or not the new XFree86 licens was GPL-compatable, and NetBSD isn't under the GPL, you wouldn't expect them to have a problem.
Can someone explain why open source projects are rejecting the new XFree86 license? I looked it over and it looked OK to me, at least for BSD-licensed projects.
I saw several comments on the freebsd-ports list that the FreeBSD troops see no problem in the adoption either.
The reason was also the same, clientside libs seem to go free.