Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

International Domain Name Disputes Analyzed

Posted by timothy on from the right-to-mindshare dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Interestingly, there's a new article on Domain Name Disputes, from an international perspective, at the Oklahoma Journal of Law And Tech. It specifically looks at protest or 'sucks' sites."

5 of 20 comments (clear)

  1. Frame link by kathgar1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.okjolt.org/published/2004mainrev10.html For all of you lynx folks who would have to figure out which of 4 frames is the correct one...

    1. Re:Frame link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want to use that link to open the page alone in a more mainstream browser, you'll have to disable Javascript - they've got a Javascript thingimabob to reload the whole frameset if (parent.location.href == self.location.href)

      Because everyone prefers to read articles when they're squashed to 10% of the available screensize.

    2. Re:Frame link by kathgar1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Worked fine for me in FireFox. I right clicked in the main frame, frame, show only this frame. Even worked when I copy/pasted it into a new tab before I made the comment.

  2. Re:Arbitrators and companies both think strangely by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Informative
    Ummm...

    I went there, and it appears to be a legitimate protest site. See for yourself.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  3. Re:Arbitrators and companies both think strangely by belmolis · · Score: 3, Informative

    I picked a bad example. chasebanksucks.com is the one domain name of this type that the critics got before the bank tried to pre-empt them.