Slashdot Mirror


Manufacturing 1 PC Takes 1.8 Tons Of Raw Material

remy writes "Although most of it (1.5 metric tons) is water, a study from the United Nations University details the raw materials used in the manufacture of a PC and 17" CRT. That's an incredible environmental cost per PC, and a very strong argument for trying to leverage older equipment, not to mention upgrading rather than replacing."

12 of 687 comments (clear)

  1. Make me feel good... by index72 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that I haven't bought a monitor in seven years and have fished several out of the garbage. Using a KVM switch is helpful too.

  2. While I like the message... by The+Uninformed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have this odd feeling that they are neglecting how much it would cost to make the second PC and monitor; how much of the material cost is simply overhead?

    1. Re:While I like the message... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, this definitely falls into the "lies, damned lies and statistics box." They are claiming it takes 240 kilograms of fossil fuels to create a 17" CRT that currently sells for $125. Now, coal is about the cheapest fossil fuel out there and it costs about $30 per metric ton of coal. So, that's $7.50 in the price of a 17" CRT just for coal. Now, in that $7.50 1/4 metric ton of coal, there are 5.1 million BTUs of energy. Comparatively, total annual energy consumption per capita is about 250 million BTUs. So, does it really strike you as plausible that the fossil fuel energy required to make your CRT is 2% of your consumption? That is to say, if you have 5 monitors (I do), that's equal an entire month of your total energy consumption? As a comparison, it takes about 250 kilos of gasonline to drive from Los Angeles to New York City. So, they are positing that it takes as much energy to produce a CRT as to propel 1.5 tons of metal and flesh 2800 miles at 70mph. Not. Bloody. Likely.

  3. Well, I hope I don't "upgrade" the wrong part... by Moofie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, so I opt to upgrade my computer instead of buying a new one (which is the only thing I've ever done in the last 20 years of PC use).

    What parts shouldn't I upgrade in order to be "environmentally friendly"? I'm sure the case doesn't take a hellacious amout of natural resources. I mean, it's just bending metal. The power supply is relatively simple electronics.

    So, my guess is that the biggest consumers of resources are going to be the hard drive, the memory, the processor, and the motherboard.

    Which are things I upgrade. Regularly.

    I think environmental conservation is an important idea, but it seems like "Upgrade! Don't replace!" just gives the manufacturers a good excuse to not explore less environmentally hostile manufacturing techniques.

    Having said all that, the beauty of water is that when you use it, you get to use it again. Yay water cycle. Makes planet work good.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  4. How does this compare? by zerblat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It would be interesting to compare these numbers with the amount of raw material used to manufacture other household items etc, e.g. other electronics, furniture, refrigerators, cars, clothes, food. The figures are probably surprisingly high nomatter what you look at.

    So yeah, recycling really is a good idea.

    --
    Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
  5. Re:Check your local laws by Eivind · · Score: 5, Interesting
    That always amased me about the US: How manufacturers and sellers don't have to take responsibility for the stuff they sell.

    Making people pay to get rid of the hazardous waste is the wrong aproach, because guess what, lots of people will opt for the free aproach of dumping the stuff somewhere.

    Much better is the model used for example in Scandinavia. If you sell a certain type of electric thingie, you have to be willing to take it back, at no cost, and dispose of it properly.

    This means, if you've got an old computer you want to get rid of, you can deliver it, without paying, to any shop that sells computers. No it doesn't matter if they didn't sell *this*spesific* computer.

    The practical offshot is offcourse that the sellers bake the cost of this into the cost of a new computer, I've seen calculations that say these rules makes new computers $5-$10 more expensive than they'd otherwise be. I think that's a acceptable trade-off.

  6. Environmentally friendly manufacturers by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've not bought a PC from them yet, but I like the look of Hoojum. They certainly seem to be the most ethical manufacturer I've come across. Does anyone else know of any companies that do similar things?

  7. I'm sick of the leveraging old equipment argument. by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can't remember the brand of cigarette, but their ads always featured some long legged model with the tagline "We've come a long way baby"

    Using SSH and console is ok, when I just have to pop in really quick to edit some conf file, or tail -f some log. %80 of the time i'm doing this, it's pertaining to some clients web site i'm working on.

    Guess what though? Do I fire up lynx to view my changes? Hell no! I use mozilla or IE, or some other html renderer. Do I create graphics or video from the console too? Hell no, I use some graphic program, with some nice gui, and pretty little icons everywhere BECAUSE I LIKE IT!!!!

    Not only do I like it for that kind of work, I like it FAST! The faster the better!

    Does it look like I care about leveraging old hardware for modern content? (shameless plug)

    What I do use old equipment for is an ipcop firewall. I also use it to frankenstien together stepper motor interfaces because it IS old and I don't give a crap if it catches on fire because I wired something the wrong way.

    Here's the whole wrapup to my post, i.e. the point. I read slashdot everyday, I build mosix clusters using plumpOS (couldn't remember the link sorry) My garage is filled from top to bottom with old computer crap because I know i'm not average joe sixpack user, and I will find a purpose for it even if it's just for research or fun. Average joe sixpack doesn't care about these things, he just wants his little clickety click icons to open up faster, or his OS to load quicker, or his games to run better.

    And I sympathize with him %100. Thanks Joe sixpack for not taking the time to learn what I do, because I'm that car that stops outside your house to load up that PC you put out with your trash.

  8. Re:Wake-on-LAN? by Sven+The+Space+Monke · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've got one for ya.

    I work in a LAN gaming center. Most of you have probably seen the type - lost of high end gaming pay-for-play comps loaded with CS, BF:1942, CoD, UT2k3, and a bunch of other acronyms. The power buttons on the cases are really inconvienient to get to (behind one of those door things, 5' off the floor, turned to the side so the case window faces out).

    Hitting all those power buttons is NOT FUN. Not difficult, just annoying. So, being the compsci student I am, I wrote a litte C proggie that sends WOL packets out to any machine I want. Incorporate a small databse of the MAC's and a tidy front-end and voila - instant 'power-on' menu. It works well. I'm also going to write a small client-side app that allows me to turn them off remotely, just for fun.

    --
    A man who can't pronouce "nuclear arsenal" shouldn't have one -sig ends here.
  9. Upgrade doesn't have to mean replacement by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I seen plenty of Dell P3's in offices that have dual cpu capabilitie but only 1 cpu installed. Yes P3's are hard to come by but instead of replacing all PC's in your business take out half. Put their CPU's and memories in the P3's you are keeping and voila. Very nice fast machines.

    You can also do a lot with a simple memory upgrade.

    This is after all the business market. Not the home user market. For office use a dual P3 is even better (with the right modern OS) then a single P4. No more lag while your wordproccessor starts up.

    With such an upgrade you just doubled the life of the Mobo, memory, cpu, HD, expansion cards, cables and monitor. 50% reduction in waste. Not bad eh?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  10. Re:Huh what? by frog51 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here they aren't saying anything about the water, but are implying it is 'removed' or 'used up' which is nonsense. It goes somewhere, and probably very near the original 1.3 tons is output as water. What is very important, as mentioned earlier on, is what happens to it, and how effective decontamination is.

    Ideally it is still going to it's original destination , valley basin or whatever, just rerouted along the way.

  11. Mostly refining raw materials by Brown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just making the metal for the case will use a *lot* of water, for coolant etc. You'd be amazed - in some countries, up to and beyond 100 tons of water can be used to make a ton of steel.

    Most of the fossil fuels are probably mostly used in various refining materials process - the case, again, a lot of power needed for that. All the different materials in the PC and monitor adds up amazingly fast - remember that the actual raw materials are really cheap, so you don't see much cost due to this when you buy something in a high-street store.

    -Chris