The Implications Of Software Commodity?
comforteagle writes "David Stutz has written elegant piece over at OSDir.com titled 'Some Implications of Software Commoditization'. It explores the concept of commodification in a historical context while also seeking to discover lessons that might be applied to contemporary open source business efforts. David gets extra points in my books for including sugar, Shakespeare, open source, MP3s, and the British Empire in one article."
Everyone knows that Shakespeare (who was a sugar freak) would have released his work as Open Source in an MP3 format if the British Empire hadn't stopped him.
Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
simoniker really just wanted to one-up David Stutz by including sugar, Shakespeare, open source, MP3s, and the British Empire in one SENTENCE! Is there a special karma bonus for that?
(Hey! I just did it too! Can I have the karma bonus as well? Nevermind the karma. Just visit my website and support the Creative Commons.)
David gets extra points in my books for including sugar, Shakespeare, open source, MP3s, and the British Empire in one article.
..."
"To MP3 or not to MP3, that is the question:
Whether 'tis GNUer in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous coffee with no sugar
Okay, do I get points now?
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
If I see the word "commodity" one more time today, I am going to puke.
The problem really is that the act of copying a piece of software is terribly easy and costs: The price of the electricity used to run the devices doing the copying plus the cost of wear and tear on the device plus the cost of the media used to store the new copy plus the cost of wear and tear on the media.
You forgot that every time you copy software illegally, an angel gets his wings ripped off and baby jesus cries (for 3 hours.)