Slashdot Mirror


TV Losing to Video Games

An anonymous reader writes "Sony studies gaming habits finds that most games are played from 5pm to 11pm. Shock! The days of the week might have been more useful..." of course the real point of all this is that the younger generation is turning away from television and turning to games.

15 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Cinemax still reigns supreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    most games are played from 5pm to 11pm
    And what happens at 11pm? Oh yeah... Cinemax starts their quality material.

  2. Must be students by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

    The 5-11 slot must be just for students.

    I have to go to work every day, so most of my video game playing is restricted to 9am-5pm.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Must be students by smellygeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is your company hiring?

    2. Re:Must be students by rokka · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is Leviethan's boss posting. Yes, as a matter of fact we just got an opening.

      --
      I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
  3. Simple Reason by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Simple reason - the quality of video games is consistently improving, and the quality of television material is consisently regressing. What kid wouldn't want to play the latest Final Fantasy/Legend of Zelda/id first person shooter when the other option is watching American Idol.

  4. what is considered the younger generation? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those born in the 70s like me? The 60s? I mean, I know a lot of "older" people in their 30-40s who play games.

    It's not just a younger generation thing. Unless a 44 year old is considered younger.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:what is considered the younger generation? by hobbespatch · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Those born in the 70s like me? The 60s? I mean, I know a lot of "older" people in their 30-40s who play games.

      My grandparents have a ColecoVision that they play all the time. But being a 30 year old - and generation X - it seems like a lot of us have gaming addictions.

      As always - it comes down to doing things in moderation (coffee, sex, cigars, games) just don't be like the gamer in China who died after 20 straight hours online.

      --
      Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
  5. It's too bad we don't hear things like.... by thesadjester · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TV is losing to reading books.

    Even with the advent of the American coffee shop and the massive book retailers (B&N, Borders, etc.), people just don't read much it seems.

    I've heard book sales are up, but not reading, which is highly interesting. It means people buy books with the intent of reading them but never do. Or they just want to seem smart? Who knows.

    --
    -gabe
    1. Re:It's too bad we don't hear things like.... by minus9 · · Score: 5, Funny
      YeAh bUte WTF iS ShE rEAdiN oNe tHe MasSag BoRed!!!!!!!!111111one ROFLMAO

      Judging by the illiterate content of most chat rooms , she would probably be better off not reading anything.

  6. Not just the "younger generation" by southpolesammy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've nearly completely switched from TV as an entertainment mechanism to video games on my PS2 and my PC. And I'm 33.

    Besides, wasn't there just something published that said the average gamer is around 29-30 years old?

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  7. Nope by iibbmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's simply because there isn't much on network television in that timeslot that is entertaining to men 18-35. Most tv on the networks is completely geared towards women or 'metrosexual' men that want to watch crap with a laugh track.

    Cable, luckily, is noticing this problem and is now working towards more tv that appeals to men, though 90% of it is overdone crap (new manshow). Look to Discovery for an example of how to provide decent male programming. We are all watching Cnn, history, tlc, discovery, speed, spike (not me!), comedy central, or HBO.

    Oh yeah, or playing Video Games.

  8. Good by DrugCheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I get a lot of crap from people who say I play to much video games. These same people then turn around and sit their ass on the couch the same ammount of time and watch TV. I think it's better for you to be playing video games then watching TV, at least you're participating in something.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  9. Inevitable by Myopic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one really thinks t.v. is a great medium, anyway. It's passive. That was the complaint all along -- people rotting their brains watching a passive medium for hours and hours. It should be no surprise that other exciting electrical mediums like games and (more important to me) the internet will supplant television. I don't think t.v. is going to go away because sometimes a passive video medium is appropriate (sitcoms and dramas as we know them can't really be interactive; movies; etc.), but viewership will shrink (in terms of average hours watched).

    Nobody thinks this is a bad thing. Yo, if someone is going to waste their time consuming hollow, useless things they may as well do it actively, interactively, rather than watching produced, linear shows.

  10. Commercials by ShortedOut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When will the networks learn that 20 and 30 somethings are tired of commercials? There has to be another way for a TV network to make money.

    Just like HBO, sure you pay for it, sure it doesn't have any commercials for OTHER companies, but damn they love to plug HBO every chance they get. I already bought the damn channel, I don't need to know how great you are.

    I think gamers and nerds are just tired of the constant stream of bullshit that is coming from the media. This especially goes for all the half-truths and demonizing of opponents in the upcoming elections.

    We'd rather hang out with friends and frag each other than sit still on the couch and be force fed bullshit and editorialized news.

    Martha Stewart, Michael Jackson, Kobe Bryant, I couldn't give less of a shit about, but they're on the news every day because that is what advertising firms say that the US is interested in.

    We've got a freaking WAR in Iraq that we only hear about in blurbs. We have TROOPS in Afganistan that we're lucky to hear about once a week. And we have diplomatic issues with France and Europe that we NEVER hear about. What about that whackjob over in North Korea? Why is China so quiet about everything? That's what I want to hear about, not how many kids Michael Jackson touched or how this woman is missing in Minnesota, hell people go missing in my local area every day, why did she rate?

    That's why I get my news here, and other online sources. It's because it's on demand, and what I want to read about. And best of all, I don't have to watch any commercials.

  11. Same excuse as everyone else uses! by swordgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Kids aren't buying music--it's because of file sharing!"
    "Kids aren't watching TV--it's because of computer games!"
    "Our software isn't selling--it's because of Microsoft!"

    How hard is it to figure out that YOUR CONTENT SUCKS!!!? Maybe those other things play a part. Maybe the competition for your audience has become stiffer. Producing ever-increasingly BAD content and blaming the competition isn't going to fix anything!

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban