Slashdot Mirror


Orange County: More E-Ballots Cast Than Voters

Nofsck Ingcloo writes "Orange County, California has discovered the joys of electronic voting. The story originated in the LA Times, which requires registration to view it. Yahoo News has a copy here. Problems occurred in races throughout the county. Among the symptoms of the problem were turnouts exceeding 100%." Read on for more.

"David Hart, chairman of Texas-based Hart InterCivic, which manufactured Orange County's voting system, said it would be impossible to identify which voters cast ballots in the wrong precincts because of steps the company had taken to ensure voter secrecy. For this reason, an exact account of miscast ballots is impossible. The good news, if the folks there can be believed, is that there is no evidence yet that any result is in jeopardy. In a masterpiece of understatement, elections system analyst Kim Alexander is quoted as saying, "Certainly this kind of problem that's occurred in Orange County doesn't do anything to contribute to greater confidence in electronic voting systems." Steve Rodermund, Orange County's registrar of voters, is quoted as saying that despite the problems, he is satisfied with the performance of Orange County's new electronic voting system."

4 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Paper Ballots by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even with paper ballots, the poll workers could have given out the wrong ballot to the voters. It wouldn't have made a difference in the results. It's still the wrong ballot, whether it's paper or bits.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  2. Reality Check Kids.. by somepunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So the election officials panic at the problems in 2000 and run out and the newest, slickest gadgets they can find. Somebody should give them some valium, have them count to ten, and show them how NASA does procurement.

    You don't use untested technology for something this important. The perception is that all the old voting systems are inadaquate. What a load of bunk. In the Twin Cities, we use optical scanners, which are fast, easy to use, and hard to screw up. The scanning machine can even complain instantly if you do something silly like vote for two condidates in the same race. I'll stop rambling now.

    --
    Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov)
  3. Re:Why can't America get this right? by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The powers that be WANT these machines in place because they are easily manipulated. There are already weird anomolies where republicans win landslides when exit polls indicate they should not have.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  4. Printed receipts would have allowed a recount by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perfect example of why printed receipts are needed.

    Here we have an election where the results were obviously wrong, yet no recount is possible.

    The fact that the fraud is not alleged and that election was not close enough for the error to matter is irrelevant. What happens when the election is close?

    There has to be a way to check the results.