Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Aims to Redo the Internet Protocol

Xaleth Nuada writes "The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) is looking to redo the entire Internet Protocol. With the DoD increasingly adopting network-centric warfare the shortcomings in the current IP have become resoundingly clear. Everything works fine for static hardwired networks. But not for dynamic wireless ones. The benefits for your average geek? How about REAL wireless networking? Easier network set-up? Increased wireless security protocol? Increased reliability in sending information?" Don't forget massive incompatibility and upgrade hassles. :)

22 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. arf by Renraku · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Don't forget massive incompatibility and upgrade hassles."

    I read that as:

    "Don't forget about the sudden explosion of extended-temp jobs flooding the market as the Internet decides to change over..."

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  2. And I just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upgraded to IPv6. Sigh.

  3. Protocol 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'd best be careful, or this "Protocol 7" will inadvertently cause data from dead people to leak to the Internet...

  4. Re-Inventing the Wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can I hear someone say IPv6?

    Someone has not got enough to do....

  5. Keeps me in work! by IAmTheDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't forget massive incompatibility and upgrade hassles. :)

    Yeah man, but massive incompatability and upgrade hassles are what keep some of us employed! GO DARPA!

    --
    Excuse my speling.
    Making The Bar Project
    1. Re:Keeps me in work! by peragrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahh I see you have your shiny MSCE out on the wall as well.

      You know there's this thing called linux that will make your life easier. :->. Instead of massive incompatibility and upgrade hassles, you get to spend hours compiling it your self, but it will work.

      tis a joke people get a life

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  6. Roll out date? by RevDobbs · · Score: 5, Funny

    And when will this new Internet Protocol be rolled out...

    shortly after IPv6 adoption?

    I don't see Satan reaching for his winter parka just yet...

    1. Re:Roll out date? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1, Funny

      Look OUT!!! Black Heli on your six!!

      --
    2. Re:Roll out date? by Misch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Satan is still in Buffalo. Considering it's about 25 F and snowing there, I'll bet he's reaching for his winter parka.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  7. DARPA Aims to Redo.... by They_Call_Me_Spanky · · Score: 0, Funny

    Please! Anyone but Microsoft!

    --
    -Oy Vey
  8. Re:DODgy by name and nature ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're right. It's a good thing they weren't involved in setting up our current system.

    Seriously, if they are going to rework it they better do something about the SPAM.

  9. Sounds like a good idea, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's just all pray the military dosn't call this SKYNET.

  10. Oh no, my backward compatability! by blunte · · Score: 4, Funny
    Don't forget massive incompatibility and upgrade hassles. :)

    Yeah, heaven forbid we learn from our previous attempt and start fresh. We should aspire to do like Microsoft - maintain backward compatability above all other goals. Seems to work for them, right? It certainly makes things more secure...
    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  11. Re:DODgy by name and nature ? by beacher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Heh.. the article is titled "DARPA Takes aim at IT Sacred Cows"... Love it. They rewriting the stack so that India can't connect? Is this the answer to outsourcing?

  12. IPv7 by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but the serious question is whether or not this so-called IPv7 will incorporate the Schumann resonance, tap into the collective unconsciousness of mankind, spontaneously create a little girl complete with family, and allow its creator to become some sort of god-like revenant.

    Maybe I'm just watching too much anime...

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  13. REDO THE INTERNET??? by Xiaotou · · Score: 2, Funny


    Does Al Gore know about this?

  14. MOD PARENT DOWN by Imperator · · Score: 2, Funny

    It made me come dangerously close to reading the article.

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  15. Does this mean that Al Gore got it wrong.... by tiger99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...when he invented the internet?

  16. Heaven forbid by szquirrel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget massive incompatibility and upgrade hassles.

    Yeah, just like that PCI bus clusterfuck. What a nightmare that was. Was ISA really so bad that we all had to buy new motherboards and expansion cards? Oh wait, yes it was.

    Sometimes if you want to move forward you have to pick up your feet.

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
  17. Babbage by VoidEngineer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Flaws in the basic building blocks of networking and computer science... "It is time to ask the harder questions about the ways of computer architecture we've been using for the past 30 years. Is it time to scrap the von Neumann architecture?"

    Sigh... I guess it's back to building the Analytic Engine... Pass me the lathe, will ya...

  18. This is awesome, now we can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    network-enable our supply of bouncing bettys.

    Landmines work so much better if they can talk to each other...

  19. Re:DODgy by name and nature ? by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

    do you believe that AES has some backdoor that lets the US military decrypt your private bits?

    If it does, my wife will be pretty upset - she believes she's the only one with access to my private bits.

    If it's true, the US military better look out - never underestimate the power of a jealous woman with PMS.