In Google We Trust
firstadopter.com writes "The New York Times (registration needed) writes about how far Google has penetrated our culture (soul sucking "Free" registration required) in the last six years with the pros and cons of its success. It's amazing to think 200 million searches are done on the search engine each day on an index of 6 billion pages."
Wow, this is BIG news!
People use Google!
Calling the f'ing newspaper!
That must hurt them deeply. I bet they miss you.
www.google.com
Here is the cached page if we ./ google:
J :w ww.google.com/+google&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
...
http://66.102.11.104/search?q=cache:zhool8dxBV4
Wait
Somehow I don't think "Just Dogpile it" would have the same effect :)
I preface this by saying Google is probably the only search engine I use at the moment but ...
This stinks of hype. With an IPO due later this year, a established news source writing at lengths about the wonders of Google sounds a bit fishy. I began to wonder reading the article - who exactly really wrote this...
Hopefully its just the paranoid part of me.
Some one, please, prove me wrong.
[ Monday is a terrible way to spend one seventh of your life. ]
From the article:
My interpretation of the sentence was: hmm, strange that so many Slashdot trolls share the name "Dave Gorman".
668.5
"...It's amazing to think 200 million searches are done on the search engine each day on an index of 6 billion pages."
Less impressive when you realize that 150 million of those searches are for Britney and Janet...
(I kid, google is the most esssential tool for my job...)
Acquiescence leads to obliteration
Wait...I think I might have figured out your problem. Have your recent search strings been similar to "penis enlargement" or "free Nigerian money"?
1. Get free Nigerian Money.
2. There is no other step.
3. Profit.
Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.
Microsoft will never be a verb.
I've heard it used as an expletive
Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.