Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Shows Off Megapixel Camera Phone

Anonymous Coward writes "According to PC World, the Nokia 7610 has been announced at Cebit in Germany - it boasts a megapixel camera (1152 x 864 pixels), 65,000 color screen, and 4x zoom, along with an MP3 music player and smart phone features that allow users to manage and edit digital images. It can also create short films of up to 10 minutes and with the Movie Director application users can add special effects and music to the video clips." Other readers point out a picture of the phone, which comes with the LifeBlog software "to help people organise the information they capture about their lives on handsets."

6 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. short films? by wiggys · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm sure it can create short films of 10 minutes... that's if you don't mind a low resolution low framerate compressed-to-hell pixellated blob resembling vomit!

    Best stick with the mobile phone that's also a low-res video camera aspect I think instead of making wild marketing claims about how the phone can make you the next Steven Spielberg...

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

  2. Megapixels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Megapixels is the most idiotic resolution measurement system ever. Quick, what resolution does 3 megapixel equal? 3.2? 4? 5? IF THE CAMERA HAS A RESOLUTION OF 1152x864, just fucking say so. I should make a camera with a resolution of 1x5000000 and call it a 5 megapixel camera just out of spite.

  3. I apologise for luddism. by shic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since the early 1990s I've seen immense value in having a mobile phone - just to remain in contact. 1990s phones were temperamental, fragile, bulky and permanently approaching a flat battery. In the noughties things started to look up - phones designs started to become more robust (no aerial sticking out); came in conveniently small packages and battery life sufficient for a working week on standby.

    Britain recently passed drive-phoning laws - which bans using a hand-held phone while "driving" (including when stationary - say in a not-infrequent motorway hold up) and I decided a legal hands-free kit would be needed. Blue-tooth seemed to be the perfect answer to the problem - a simple system wired into my car so that whenever my engine is running, the in-car hands free kit takes control of any phone calls - allowing me to legally use my phone without taking it out of my pocket. Off I trooped to the mall now obscenely cluttered with mobile phone shops. To say I was surprised is an understatement!

    Phone size - if I want blue tooth then I must have a larger phone (very undesirable) but that it would have a camera in it (no use at all thanks - maybe even a hindrance as I might not be permitted to take it with me everywhere I go) and a snazzy colour screen (Why!?! I just want to make and receive calls!) and a dramatically reduced battery life to boot. As for wireless connectivity - the vendors advise it is normally turned off, and activated only for the duration I'm using a particular blue tooth service...( What's the point then!?!!! ) and that using blue tooth would dramatically reduce battery life again!

    Don't get me wrong I've been very impressed with my current Nokia 8310, but can't help feeling that more modern phones have become feature crazy and now neglect the primary requirement to make mobile telephone conversations convenient and reliable with minimum effort. Nokia - PLEASE - stop concentrating on the gimmicks and get back to making solid reliable phones for business use.

  4. Re:Er... by eraserewind · · Score: 5, Interesting
    But, honestly who buys a phone for the CAMERA?
    30% of the phone market if the Sony Ericsson are to be believed.

    The point of phones on cameras is that people bring their phone everywhere. People don't bring their camera everywhere, no matter how small it is. Of course a tiny fixed lens is going to be worse than one with real optical zoom, but it's plenty good enough for a lot of things.
    Yea, I own an LG-VX6000, and I tell you this...I bought it for the actual features it has as a phone and not the camera.
    As you should. It is after all primarily a phone.
    I've taken a few pictures with the camera, and put simply...there can be no replacement for film and digital cameras anytime in the near future.
    People said the same about digital cameras when they first arrived, but now you are including them with film to make your point. This Nokia phone has the same resolution as the Kodak that I bought 5 years ago. That's not such a long time really. Other manufacturers have already 2 and higher megapixel phones, and I can't see them stopping competing with each other anytime soon.
  5. Only 1 megapixel? by achurch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess now would not be the time to mention that Japan is already up to two megapixel phones . . .

  6. Re:4x digital zoom by *weasel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or, just have the phone use a general wireless device for storage. That way you could keep all your data (mp3s, digipics, pda, etc) in one place, and devices could leverage functionality.

    I'd really like to be able to use 1 data source for my phone/pda/camera/mp3 player. Convergence devices are cute, but impractical. Removing storage from each of those items listed would let them shrink to about the size of a sharpie (real digi camera excluded, but getting there), and would let me /add/ functionality (new devices) without worrying about swapping data around, or incompatible memory card formats and such.

    At the gym I like to have mp3s without the phone, and I'd like to not violate the 'ban' on digital cameras.

    Pictures I take with my real camera, I'd like to be able to email.

    Songs I get from iTunes i'd like to be able to email, or directly, wirelessly, share.

    contacts in my pda i'd like to have access to on my phone - but I really don't need/want the power drain of a palmOS or winCE just to make a phone call.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"