Slashdot Mirror


Personal Experiences with HomeCS?

whoami-ky asks: "If you believe the info on their homepage, HomeCS is 'the Internet's Premier work from home career portal which unites thousands of job seekers and employers everyday.' But, when you try to apply for a job through them, you're immediately asked to pony up $29.95 for a 'lifetime' membership. Has anyone used this company to successfully find a telecommuting job? They have a 100% satisfaction guarantee. Anybody gotten a refund? A quick Google search on the term HomeCS didn't seem to show any positive or negative feedback (I only went through the first 3 or 4 pages of results)."

34 comments

  1. SCAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "Work at home" is ALWAYS a scam.

    RUN AWAY!

    1. Re:SCAM! by whoami-ky · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's my first reaction too... That's why I'm specifically interested in actual experiences with the company.

      --
      See my blog at Who's Who
    2. Re:SCAM! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Yes, that's my first reaction too...

      There's a reason.

      > That's why I'm specifically interested in actual experiences with the company.

      You're unlikely to get a lot of that sort of response, for a couple of reasons.

      1. As uninformed and illogical as the slashdot crowd can be, I don't think
      most of us are gullible *enough* to fall for something like *that*.
      2. Those who are probably don't want to publically admit it; even if they
      did post, it would almost surely be AC. Better browse at -1 if you
      want to have any chance at all of seeing them.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:SCAM! by PinkFreud · · Score: 1

      Not always - there are people who do work from home and do not have a problem.

      However, I'm not going to give someone money so I can find a job. In general, THAT is a scam.

  2. This particular item seems a bit skeevy... by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the HomeCS website under the "Companies" link:
    The following is a list of employers who have historically hired telecommuters. Although they may not all have jobs posted with us currently, these and companies like these are examples of companies that could hire you via HomeCS.com.

    ...which sounds somewhat like a load. I work for one of the companies listed, and they do all their hiring through a company-owned hiring service. There are *no* full-time telecommuters in the division I am in, it's a "couple of days a week" thang.

    Of course, I could be wrong...

    1. Re:This particular item seems a bit skeevy... by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny
      The following is a list of employers who have historically hired telecommuters. Although they may not all have jobs posted with us currently, these and companies like these are examples of companies that could hire you via HomeCS.com.

      Welcome to orthogonal's DatingCS Service!

      The following is a list of women who have historically dated men. Although they may not all have profiles posted with us currently (or ever!), these and women like these are examples of women who could (it's mathematically possible, especially if you become the last man on Earth and they become blind!) date you via DatingCS.com.....
      • Natalie Portman
      • The Olson Twins
      • That Swedish Chick
      • That Swedish Chick getting a Ph.D. in Mathematics
      • The chick you bought a drink for last night, whose entire conversation with you consisted of "Thanks, I have to go."
      • Marie Curie


      For $29.95, you can join orthogonal's dating service and learn new depths of disappointment!
  3. Their most popular employer... by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool, you can get a job working for SCO from home!

    http://www.homecs.com/telecommuter_employers.php?# QT

    At least that way, you wouldn't have to worry about getting all of your stuff packed up and out of the office when they finally go under.

    1. Re:Their most popular employer... by cybermace5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah I see now, they're counting all of the Linux developers as SCO employees, since SCO owns Linux....

      --
      ...
  4. I know by aero6dof · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll tell you for $15 :)

  5. Office Equipment by WyerByter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And maybe you'd like to buy a computer from Micheal's computers to work from?

    --

    This signiture copied from somewhere.
    1. Re:Office Equipment by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'll have the company pick that up for me, then it's upon them to deal with delays in delivery. I get paid for the telecomuting work I could be doing if I had that really fast computer...

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Office Equipment by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      At least I got the joke.

    3. Re:Office Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Michael" you fucking idiot! "MichAEl!"

      FUCK!

  6. Cool by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1


    Maybe they'll hire me to sell Michael's Computers!

    [GROAN]

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  7. Doesn't date.com have a simular statement? by El · · Score: 4, Funny

    The following are pictures of women who have historically dated. Although they may not all have accounts with us currently, these and women like these are examples of girlfriends you could meet through date.com!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  8. Check Google's WebQuotes by ironfrost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google Webquotes is one of Google Labs' projects; to quote the blurb it "annotates the results of your Google search with comments from other websites. This offers a convenient way to get a third party's opinion about each of the returns for your search, providing you with more information about that site's credibility and reputation."

    Sad to say, the news isn't good. Check out this forum thread for a comprehensive bashing.

  9. The only listing... by BrynM · · Score: 3, Funny
    The only listing they probably have:

    Processing Payments from Technology Professionals!
    You can earn $5 a peice for processing $29.95 payments from today's top technology professionals! We receive countless individual payments from morons^^^^^professionals every day and need your help...

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  10. Run screaming. by jonadab · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let me get this straight -- this outfit wants to charge you money up front for
    the valuable opportunity to do business with them and possibly get a job, and
    you're sufficiently unsure whether this is a good idea that you have to ask on
    slashdot?

    Dude, nobody legitimate has to charge you for the chance to work. A temp
    agency might charge your employer more than they pay you and so skip off the
    top, but they don't get a *dime* until you get a paycheck. Similarly, a more
    traditional employer might place expectations on you (dresscode or whatnot)
    that might result in your spending money before your first day on the job,
    but you don't pay *them* anything.

    Work-from-home is notoriously fertile ground for scammers of all kinds, but
    if they're wanting to charge you up front for a lifetime membership for the
    opportunity to work, that should set off loud alarms and flashing red lights
    in your brain even if the job in question were more traditional (e.g. factory).

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    1. Re:Run screaming. by kurosawdust · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...skip off the top...

      You know you're in too-much-coffee land when after reading that your first thought is of a Manpower executive using the profit from the difference in employer's cost and employee's salary to finance dainty frolics through open fields.

      (-1, Sexuality Questioning)

    2. Re:Run screaming. by GlenRaphael · · Score: 1
      Dude, nobody legitimate has to charge you for the chance to work.

      That's not entirely true. For instance, casting agencies often charge applicants a few bucks for the costs involved in taking a series of headshots and doing the data entry to get your profile into their system. That doesn't mean the jobs don't exist, just that there's a surplus of applicants.

      I paid the sfcasting.com folks ten bucks to get into their system, and have since gotten thousands of dollars of work from them. (Most of it was during the filming of _Matrix II_; I drove one of the cars in the background during the freeway chase sequence. Also, I've been in some foreign commercials and television series.)

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
  11. Very Odd Finding. by /dev/trash · · Score: 3, Informative
    I did a whois and got this:
    Registrant Contact:

    hostmaster mp3s (dnsadmin@nssrv.com)
    +1.5095626502
    Fax: +1.5095626502
    Dubravska 9
    Bratislava, 842 38
    SK

    Status: registrar-lock

    Name Servers:
    ns1.iad1.nssrv.com
    ns2.iad1.nssrv.com


    So the website is not even registered in the US. So good luck if you get scammed. And then when I do a whois of nssrv, I get that it's registered to 127.0.0.1.
  12. The WHOIS for this one is interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Registration Service Provided By:
    Contact: dnsadmin@nssrv.com
    Visit:

    Domain name: homecs.com

    Administrative Contact:
    hostmaster mp3s (dnsadmin@nssrv.com)
    +1.5095626502
    Fax: +1.5095626502
    Dubravska 9
    Bratislava, 842 38
    SK


    I'd be concerned...

  13. Who Accepted This Article? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative


    Seriously, these guys are pushing one of the oldest scams in the world. Send us money for work at home opportunities has been one of the FTC's main scam warnings for years and is a common theme in spam messages.

    Here are some references:

    http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/ftc_work_at_ h. htm

    http://www.keytlaw.com/FTC/Actions/ftc020730.htm

    http://boston.internet.com/news/article.php/2173 09 1

    The FTC should be informed of these guys so they can shut them down.

    I am surprised that Slashdot's editors would let an article like this get through. Rather that posting this as a question, it should be posted as a warning. For all we know the person asking the question could be trying to attract traffic to this site.

    This story should be pulled ASAP.

    1. Re:Who Accepted This Article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am surprised that Slashdot's editors would let an article like this get through



      Ahahahaahaha, what are you new here, son? That's too funny.

    2. Re:Who Accepted This Article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fucking moron. Did you even bother to look at his membership number?

    3. Re:Who Accepted This Article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I did, you fucking idiot. Can't you realize how stupid the guy is for not noticing that Slashdot editors are only slightly better trained than that Chihuahua on the Taco Bell commercials?

      Pay attention next time; being as sharp as a used tampon like you are, you'll need to.

      Fucking jackass...

    4. Re:Who Accepted This Article? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Ahahahaahaha, what are you new here, son?

      Not new, just less cynical than you.

  14. Don't be fooled by bluGill · · Score: 1

    They have hit most of the scam signs I know of, and none of the ones that might give me the benefit of the doubt. I'm not stupid, I'm not giving you money unless I think it is worth it. If they got me a job I'd give them money ($100 is cheap compared to what the other recruiters I'm talking to would get if I get hired...), but not until. Not having a free section they don't even have a chance to prove there are real jobs there, and I wouldn't pay them money for until it was proved they have jobs, right now it appears more like a scam to get my money.

    I'm ticked off at these people, everytime I search monster for a real job they show up in the results. Monster at least has real jobs. (Either that or once in a while they pay someone to call me, I haven't gotten a job through them, but I have got hints that some exist). Just based on their advertising I'm no longer willing to give them money even if they would help me get a job.

  15. They're a scam IMHO. by Satan's+Librarian · · Score: 4, Informative
    The job postings are pretty much useless, and they never replied to my requests for my $29 back. I got scammed.

    Haven't pursued it yet - it was a couple of months ago, and I've had other priorities. But I'm considering taking legal action if they don't respond when I get around to sending a paper letter.

    1. Re:They're a scam IMHO. by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 1

      Legal action over $29.95? You must be joking. Chalk it up to experience. While you're at it, try a new hobby like opening mysterious email attachments. Good Luck!

    2. Re:They're a scam IMHO. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      >
      >Legal action over $29.95? You must be joking. Chalk it up to experience. While you're at it, try a new hobby like opening mysterious email attachments. Good Luck!
      >

      That is EXACTLY what companies like this want. Why do you think it is always 19.95 or 29.95. It's always just enough that noone bothers to fight if they get screwed. The right thing to do is to fight it and then when you win make THEM pay your legal costs.

  16. Typical work at home scam by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    jeez, people fall for this crap all the time. I'm leery of ANY work at home opportunity I hear of. Critical thinking should tell you that it's not worth one second of your time. There's always exceptions, but ANY time some company or business opportunity wants you to front money, you're begging to get scammed.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.