Cheap Solar Cooling Solution?

An anonymous reader asks: "I would like to use solar panels to generate enough power to run an air-conditioner that is only needed when the sun is out. The problem lies in the cost of the battery bank, where one can quickly run to thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars. Given the state of current solar panel technology, what kind of unique solutions have people come up with to handle the voltages of this setup WITHOUT the use of a battery bank?"

"I realize that the photovoltaic array will have to be of sufficient size to offer more power than will be consumed by peak load, causing excess power, that will need to be dealt with. Also, there will need to be some monitor so that if the available energy doesn't meet the minimum threshold, then the appliance is shut off (or the juice to the circuit is cut), and vice versa. As temperatures approach 120F and more this summer, I'm putting more aside for this project and at this point am not concerned with any but simple methods of using up 'excess' energy. Though thoughts have rattled around about a Linux controlled shading system to adjust the raw juice coming off the panels through selective shading."

If the concern is cooling, then one way of burning off any "excess" power might be creative use of fans (either single fans or a bank of them; small or large, depending on the amount of excess power available). What other ways might such "excess" power be used?

Comments

Air Conditioners eat a LOT of power

[m.dillon]

Air Conditioners eat a lot of power, about a kilowatt per 700sqft. If you have a 2100sqft home airconditioning will eat around 3kW while operating. A 2.5kW solar system is considered fairly large by home standards (I have a 2.5KW system which you can see at: My Solar Panel System). This system produces about 16KwH/day in the summer and the 2.5kW is only generated for two or three hours at the peak of the day for a few weeks at high summer... nowhere near enough to run even a moderately sized AC unit. My system is setup as two strings of 9 panels fed into a high voltage inverter which then connects to the house side of the meter (and thus the grid). This is the most typical type of system found today. Older LV (low voltage) systems have higher wire and inverter conversion losses. HV systems are very efficient converting the DC into AC and have no significant wiring losses.

In terms of batteries... you only ever use batteries if you are off-grid or if the grid is really unreliable. If you are tied to the grid you do not usually use batteries... the Solar system goes through an inverter and powers the house, and any excess is fed back to the grid (running your meter backwards). The grid acts as the 'battery' in this case. If you are not producing enough to power your house, the remainder is fed to you from the grid. Grid-tie systems without batteries are the *simplest* and *cheapest* type of PV system you can buy, but you are still talking about $15-$20K for the system you see above. Systems with batteries cost a lot more (add another $5-$10K at least) plus you have maintainance requirements (Batteries wear out), and you need an ATS (Automatic Transfer Switch) which itself is expensive. On the otherhand, systems without batteries are nearly 100% maintinance free. Without batteries means that if the grid goes down, you go down too. Most people live in areas where the grid is reliable enough that there's no point doing battery storage. Also keep in mind that battery systems have much higher losses then grid-tie systems because you have a loss charging the battery and another one pulling energy out of the battery on top of the inverter losses.

Typical home AC systems eat 3kW while larger home systems eat 5kW (for homes, not apartments). Lets say you had an AC unit that eats 3kW while operating. A 2.5KW grid-tie system producing 16KwH/day would be able to run such a unit for 5 hours. As you can see, the PV system itself would not be able to power the AC unit alone, it would definitely need help from the grid, but if you only ran the AC for 5 hours the PV system would run your meter backwards the rest of the time and make up for it.

Five hours is not usually enough running time to really be able to cool a house unless you live in dessert conditions where it gets cold at night, in which case you really need to cool the house down at night so it stays cool enough so you don't have to turn on the AC until the afternoon (12-5p.m.)

So, generally speaking, trying to run an AC system with a PV (solar power) system is a bad investment. You could try running a smaller AC system but the sun generates something like a kilowatt of heat per square meter and it will easily overpower a small AC system if you do not have good insulation. Note, in particular, that if you do not have good wall insulation the sun is likely to overpower your AC during the afternoon when the sun is hitting the side of the house instead of the roof.

You would be far wiser to invest in passive technologies such as improved insulation and infra-red reflective shading. If water is cheap (or even if it isn't), a swamp cooler (rooftop evaporator) is often a great investment... it's cheap and it provides some cooling at a far lower cost then AC in electricity use. I've heard people mention GeoThermal, and it does work, but if GeoThermal is not put in when the house is actually built it can't take advantage of an under-the-house installation. Getting enough suds out o