Make the Debian CDs Better by Installing popcon
JayBonci writes "Not popcorn, popcon! (Short for popularity-contest) According to a recent message posted to debian-devel-announce, popcon numbers are being used to determine how things get arranged on the 13 CDs of the upcoming Debian stable release. Participation so far has been good, but the project could use more numbers from a broader user base. Please take a moment to install the package 'popularity-contest,' and help us make the distro better by allowing it to send us anonymous package usage statistics. You can see the results at Popularity Contest page."
As a Linux newbie (currently don't have Linux installed, but have used it and plan to install it soon), it would be nice to know which are the most popular packages. Most people would like to have an idea of what the more experienced users use, and thus would like to try it themselves. In addition to knowing the most popular packages, it would probably be a quicker install be having the best ones at the beginning of the installation process instead of having to swap CDs too many times.
--
Real time deal updates from all the major deal sites. Search easy and quickly!
Why not just make 2 DVD's?
Voluntarily giving up your privacy with fully informed consent is much different then sneaking in spyware without telling you about it. Those that are paranoid about privacy simply won't install it.
"Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney
I've seen the results of this when it was used in the Hurd CDs. There were absolutely retarded things like the battle.net client on CD #1, but not something simple like XFree86.
Popularity isn't something that works terribly well for this sort of thing, especially not on the first install CD.
The package popularity-contest is 42nd on the list with 18 less installs than the top packages, so how did these 18 people submit thier scores to the popularity contest?
Since it's using e-mail (don't know about encryption or methods of encoding), wouldn't it be rather simple to pervert the statistics in order to promote some software? A mass-mailing would be obvious, but if it's done properly it may look convincing...
Bogus
lynx (281) beats mozilla (378) :????
Not terribly surprising. I install it on all my machines (even the headless ones) for testing purposes. But only Mozilla only on my 'desktop' box.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
- Charles Darwin
I was waiting for a new Stable version after Woody, I guess, 2 years ago. Eventually, I sortof gave up.
This article seems to imply that such a release is actually going to happen.
Is it?
Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
Except, the obvious difference being is that your participation is being solicited and completely voluntary at this point. With TiVo, you're not really getting an option to opt out, even if they are pretty clear about what they're doing.
Bad idea. Doing the most popular thang is far and different from doing the right thang in many case. As Robert Plant put it, "I am not a prisoner of your hit parade". DESIGN NOT POLLING!
Yes, you are a troll. This is an optional package that people can choose to install. It's open source, and the use of the data is also completely in the open. It's not an invasion of privacy when someone wants to give you data and explicitly gives it to you.
Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
I'm one of the small number of folks running Debian on an old Powermac, so I'm glad for the log scale on the architectures plot to help pull "my" group out of the noise. It bothers me that a very large fraction come up as architecture "unknown". I don't see a "--mind-your-own-damn-business" flag in the manpage, so what's with that?
Luke, help me take this mask off
Yes. You see commercial organizations do it all the time, some of it bugs us (spyware/adware/webbugs/cross-site cookies), but a lot of it doesn't (Neilson ratings/consumer surveys/warrenty questionaires). I think we all know that to design a good product you need to listen to your consumer base.
In fact this has been one of the big pieces that has been missing with Linux distro's. We throw as many applications into them as we can, having no accurate idea whats being used and whats just in the way. This is sort of a break-through when you think about it and I applaud the Debian's refeshingly long-sightedness.
Add to that that this is a open source project (under the GPL and written in perl) and you end up with a true rarity, an honest (and auditable) marketing tool. Don't like it? Don't install it.
This looks to me like a usefull tool in the fight for increased usability. OS hackers may not be able to do the tele polls and the in-mall customer questionaires, but they sure as hell can figure out how to get that information. And we sort of owe it to then to tell them a little something about the products they spend so much time (and care) working on for us.
Just my $.02.
Quack, quack.
if microsoft said they were bundling a software tracking system to their products people would flip out. I think people would be right to get upset at someone else telling you what you are going to be sharing. This is a Linux dtstribution saying -->HERE-- is a program that might let us track popular software installations. . . Install it if you want to. That 'if you want to' part is what makes this acceptable to me. --Tsiangkun