Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft's Online Music Store
jamshedji noted a short story that talks about Microsoft's Online Music Store. The market is already getting quite crowded, so it will be interesting to see what affect the monopoly's entrance makes when this goes down in the 2nd half of this year.
Download a proprietary encoded song for 89 cents and get a WORM at no extra charge. ;-)
Microsoft's innovation and originality has just hit an all time low....
Even if I knew that tomorrow the world would go to pieces, I would still plant my apple tree. -Martin Luther
Wait.
Is "Start Me Up" by the Rolling Stones up for download? That'd bring the whole MS circle of crap to a sort of cosmic finality. :)
When life gives you lemons, you CLONE those lemons, and make SUPER-LEMONS. -- Dr. Cinnamon Scudworth, Ph.D
Microsoft should abandon that proprietary audio/video format they are clinging to and just go along with what the consumers have picked to be the defacto standard.
Sucks, doesn't it Microsoft?
"We have enough money to do something cheaper and longer than you."
Then, they wait and wait... until the market folds... and they are still on top. Who knows if it works or not, but that's their plan.
I use Microsoft everyday... but that part of Microsoft makes my stomach turn.
(See also XBOX)
Davak
I picture that Rolling Stone's song "You Cant Always Get Want You Want" being available in large numbers
Ya know, I'm not a huge Microsoft fan, but I'd probably be convinced to pay $0.99 a pop for that...
Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
As aspiring giants battle for marketshare, soon songs will be 29 cents each.
Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
They're already considering forcing Microsoft to remove media player, open some source as well as fining them.
If there's a bandwagon moving Microsoft have to jump on it.
Apple admits readily that they don't make any money off the ITMS, but use it to try and sell iPods. If MS is singing the same song (weak pun, I know,) then what are they trying to sell?
They already have WMA pimps, and will have a hell of a time competing for selection since they have to stay mainstream to have their name on it. The MS iPod killer? What a joke.
This is one of those cases when MS should have just walked away. Let the other guys handle the store and drive users to your products. There's nothing to be gained.
... just look at MSN! (On second thought just trust me on that one.) Even the most non technical people I know find MS sponsered content boring at best and insulting at worse. I don't think people are going to flock to this site with no "street cred".
:)
The only value this site has is it might bleed some cash from MS that would otherwise go to funding SCO.
The story has the MS spokesperson saying "Microsoft has not decided whether to extend its song portability to non-Windows Media devices."
If MS want to take on Apple, wouldn't it be insane for them not to offer MP3s as well? Why would they cripple the service by restricting it to WMVs?
i think the slashbots would be amazed as to how many people rely on MSN for everything - just like I rely on google for everything - sure, I think to myself WTF?? but changing the homepage for the average user is not an option.
.99 and they will buy and buy in droves.
.sig
case in point - i recently put an ad out for a car that i was selling - a 67 camaro - the car has been sold and the AD has been deleted - i am still getting queries on the car from people who are using MSN's proxy or dns servers - I get about 1-2 call/emails a day -
what i am trying to say is that even though prior to deleting the Ad I put SOLD SOLD SOLD in description space - still i get inquiries - so here is the morale of the story.
People don't read descriptions they only point and click at what they think is pretty
and
People take what is presented to them as reality - if there is an Ad then the car must still be for sale - regarless of whether or not it is sold.
Hence, if people see 99 cent songs on their hompage they will not consider who is selling them - only slashdotters seem to do this - they will only see that the song is
i have no
Funny. When I think of what Microsoft's online music store would be like, I picture an extremely limited selection of music which consists of artists like Barry Manilow, America and William Shatner.
That's true. Even MSFT TV commercials are so yucku-tacky, you know, "we want your kid to be succesful and make lots of money".
Microsoft is the polar opposite of anything "controversial", and art should thrive on a bit of controversial edge.
This is in stark contrast with what *really* takes place at Microsoft: dark dungeons with decapitated penguins, Steve Ballmer banging Bill Gates with both of them wearing S/M leather, Masonic rituals empahisizing their desire to establish a New World Order based on oppression & greed, George Bush fundraisers, black-clas programmers baking soap from the fat of newborn babies...
Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
Hopefully, increased competition in a saturated market will mean an increased willingness to bulk out music selection with more obscure or unsigned artists by at least some online vendors.
One worry, however, is that increased competition does not necessarily mean more money for existing artists. It may just mean, as usual, more extreme attempts to woo the big record companies who own them.
iTunes hits it big and suddenly the market is flooded with competitors. That's the way it happens. Ultima Online started making a mint and along came Everquest, Dark Ages of Camelot, etc. Nirvana hit the big time and suddenly there was a "Seattle" sound.
After a couple of years only a few players will remain. The rest will either have collapsed, merged or been bought by other competitors.
I will say that I'm surprised that Microsoft is getting into this game now, though. But getting into the console field seemed pretty alien so I suppose nothing is too far-fetched.
What I'm waiting on is a content provider model where one of the big companies - let's say Apple - with access to a huge library of material allows you to create your own mini-store. Sort of like Cafe Press, I suppose. You can populate your store with anything from the massive database (although most will be specialty stores selling particular genres of music). I'm not exactly sure how you could put the proper intellectual property protections on it, but it would really be great if the store "owner" could then upload material (local bands, amateur work, etc) to sell in the store.
My sigs always suck.
Pathetic.
Wasn't it a few short years ago that MS complained about the government taking away their "freedom to innovate"?
Now it seems the marketplace is running circles around Gates and Co.
Perhaps Ballmer needs to run around in circles too... this time screaming "Originality! Originality! Originality! Originality! Originality! Originality!"
The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
Comment removed based on user account deletion
It will be even more interesting to see the effect of the monopoly's entrance. And how that will affect the rest of the market. /stickler
***
The market is already getting quite crowded, so it will be interesting to see what affect the monopoly's entrance makes when this goes down in the 2nd half of this year.
Never let facts get in the way of MS bashing.
You're missing the point. Of course MS doesn't have a monopoly on online music sales. They do, however, have a monopoly on desktop operating systems. The relevance of that? Quite simple: if MS put an icon on everyone's desktop saying "Buy music online", which leads to Microsoft's music store, then they will be (ab)using their monopoly on desktops to build custom for their new venture.
That's the sort of unfair competition that anti-trust law was meant to prevent, in case you didn't realise.
I sware it seems just like when you are talking to some salesman who tells you " I will call you back {insert duration here} from now to see how you are doing" and sure as shit that long from now to the minute you get a call from them.
Microsoft must have the timer on 1 year and they set it for any emerging product that looks trendy. If that product is doing well when the tickler goes off then low and behold here is the Microsoft product.
1600s - Tulip mania
1920s - Florida real estate boom
1959-62 - "tronics" boom
2000s - xml,b2b, the internet bubble
2003-4 - the music bubble
"There was a time when every oil company went out and bought a fertilizer company, for no good reason. It was as if what was good for Standard Oil was good for Exxon, and so soon all the fertilizer companies were gobbled up" - Charlie Munger, Warren Buffet's right hand man in Berkshire Hathaway.
Why should everybody start selling music all of a sudden ? Napster started it, then Apple did it far better, then Real Networks jumped in, then that great equalizer of America - Walmart, now the ultimate monopoly - Microsoft. What do all these tech companies have to do with music ? Perhaps nothing, but then oil giants did't exactly mix with fertilizer either. Such is the madness of crowds.
It will be interesting to see how MS fares against Apple in this market. It's all pretty much going to come down to execution. While MS has a history of out executing Apple in the business arena, I really don't think they can touch them when it comes to something more "artistic" like music.
One thing Microsoft could do (and I hope they do), is pay a commission to affiliates that make sales through their store. It would be nice if they opened it up with WebServices, and acted more as a music supply platform than the itms. Of course as long as they stick with wma they're pretty much out of the game.
Gurry also declined to say whether Microsoft's music store would be bundled into Windows or featured on its Windows Media playback software.
Well duh, he doesn't have to say it. Of course they're gonna advertise it for all it's worth.
If I was a dumb joe sixpak who just bought a new computer, and there's an icon on the desktop saying "Click here to receive free music from Microsoft MSTunes," then of course I'm gonna click on it.
You're going to open the next version of Media Player and find out that there will be a button to download music from MSTunes, sign up for a free trial of MSTunes, hear the latest and greatest hits, exclusively released on MSTunes, watch a pop concert live, exclusively for MSTunes customers, open up IE and find advertisements litering the MSN homepage advertising free music if you sign up for MSTunes, open up MSWord and have a chance to insert sound files into your documents (for whatever reason), exclusively from MSTunes...
They did it with MSN. They did it with IE. They did it with Media Player. Why ask if they're going to do it with their Tunes site?
Not to mention the tight connection (via the kernel, or whatever) between:
I have seen how this evil mess works together.
Start MSIE, visit www.hotmail.com. Boom, without warning MSN-Messenger has been started.
Start some mediafiles with Windows Media Player.. If you're lucky you might get a few IE-windows poping up, even though there are no errors. Don't even ask me how that's done.
With Microsoft's ever interlinking between the operating system and applications, you can bet that anything mediarelated (opening a mp3 in Windows Explorer) will result in a chainreaction of MS-events.
I imagine it will go somewhat like this:
Ofcourse any mentioning of MP3s in mail or messenger will result in a similar list as that one above.
I'm not saying it'll be a good product, but I expect it to do remarkably well.
Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
Well, this could be wrong, but it's one guess on Microsoft's media strategy.
Microsoft's most profitable and popular two products -- Office and Windows -- primarily rely on a single mechanism to ensure their continued dominance. IE probably uses this as at least a secondary mechanism, and the X-Box uses it as well.
The idea is to ensure that third-party-produced content is produced in a form that is only useful to someone that purchases a Microsoft product, jump-start an industry producing content for that product, and then erect as many barriers as possible to anyone attempting to produce a compatible, competing product. They then enjoy a profitable feedback loop as *more* third parties are forced more and more to produce content for their system. Since their product *is* the standard (bugs and all), 100% compatibility is not likely to happen, and can be avoided by making their product a moving target when necessary.
In the case of Windows, it's Windows applications. Windows is the Microsoft-produced tool that allows the consumer to deal with Windows applications. Because Windows is around, everyone develops for Windows, and because everyone develops for Windows, it's difficult to move to anything else, even in the case of poor product quality and pricing issues that are complained about today.
In the case of MSIE, it's HTML/CSS/etc.
In the case of Office, it's Office documents.
In the case of the X-Box, it's games for the X-Box.
In the case of Media Player, it is content in the Windows Media file format.
May we never see th
...But unfotunately the RIAA record companies are not working in a free market, but are a cartel successfully sued for conspiring to fix prices. All the music stores are pricing around $1/song, and it's common knowledge that the stores, such as iTunes, aren't making any money at that price. So I wouldn't hold out for further discounts.
This, and a couple other similar experiences, is why I am adamantly against DRM. I am not willing to buy any product that depends on the existence of the company/service I bought it from, is tied to a particular computer/harddrive/etc., or puts drastic limits on my use of the product (such as limiting the number of burns, requiring me to be connected to the 'net, etc.)
I won't do it until they offer .OGG files!
Well, someone had to say it.. now move along...
I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
I don't understand what the big deal is here.
IRL there's a plethora (he said plethora) of different music retailers - some of them huge chains like HMV or Virgin (in the UK), others smaller and more independent. Some of the big dudes have taken a page out of the small dudes books and even carry more exotic flavours of music these days.
Let M$ come to market with their offering and add to the competition. As long as (and this is a big as long as) they stick to the rules of fair-play and don't try to undermine their competition, the consumer should benefit from music downloads that are cheaper than ever imagined possible.
My question is this: How long until some moron in D.C. decides that this means there are "alternatives" and try to make MP3 files illegal?
They have a long way to go. There is way too much market use of the format. It would be like making copy machines illegal at this point in time. Fine you can kill Xerox, but can you kill Cannon, HP, Minolta, Lexmark, and company? It'll be dificult to kill the idea behind a photocopy. It's just as hard to kill the format used by home bands, Public Domain, Court Records, Web Pages, etc. Everything from CDeX to Easy CD Creator to Apple, Rio, Creative Labs, use MP3 format extensively. It isn't going away soon even if you decide to change the gamebook overnight. If the format is killed, the idea of a sharable format will remain, just like photocopies will remain long after Xerox is told they can't do that anymore. (Hypothetical ban on photocopies)
The truth shall set you free!
Napster did not start the online music store craze. If we're talking actual online stores (as opposed to subscription services), Apple was the first. All subsequent ones, including Napster, Musicmatch, etc, have been pale imitators.