Slashdot Mirror


IBM Invests $50M in Novell, May Ship SUSE Linux

dave writes "Novell announced that it has finalized a $50 million investment from IBM, and that IBM can now begin shipping SUSE Linux on all IBM server platforms. Historically, IBM has been a 'Red Hat shop,' and one has to wonder if this is a harbinger of things to come."

11 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Re:IBM is a company by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do the penguins have realistic orifices?

  3. OT: Great future for Linux ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... is anyone else on the West Coast watching the sun come up and listening to Jimmy Cliff singing "I Can See Clearly Now", while pondering a great Linux future? I know I am.

    Sign me up for a new IBM ThinkPad running SUSE Linux and Ximian Desktop 2!

  4. Re:Redhat may count the cost... by Winkhorst · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Total world domination." --Linus Torvalds, a while ago.

    --
    "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  5. Red Hat is Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is now official - Netcraft has confirmed: Red Hat is dying. Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered Red Hat community when recently IDC confirmed that Red Hat accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that Red Hat has lost more market share, news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Red Hat is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Red Hat's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Red Hat faces a bleak future.

    In fact there won't be any future at all for RH because Red Hat is dying. Things are looking very bad for Red Hat. As many of us are already aware,
    RH continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

  6. Re:In other news... by mike77 · · Score: 4, Funny
    However, sources reveal that IBM itself is very interested in this "Linux" thing, and simply gave a finger to Microsoft.

    No, No, NO!
    How many times must I say this to people
    It's not a finger, it's the finger!

    --This message brought to you by the society for the encouragement of correctly used insults, gestures, and otherwiuse rude behaviour.

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  7. Re:OS/2 all over again by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh please! this is common friggen knowledge. I was just getting my whine on (sob, sob, I so miss OS/2).

    Will someon PLEASE MOD ME DOWN!

    Or at least mod me for something other than Insightful, it just makes slashdot look bad.

  8. Re:IBM is a company by Stupid+Dog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are these ladies inflatable, too? :)

  9. The Big Slashdot Onanist by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny
    To you it's "dumbing down". To me it's making computers accessible to people who don't live and breathe computing. Not knowing how to hack BitTorrent doesn't mean you're stupid -- it means you have other priorities.

    I wonder what you do for a living. Do you write bad software and then call people idiots when they can't figure it out?

    As for your girlfriend -- but no, given your expressed attitude towards people in general and women in particular, it makes more sense for you to handle sexual issues single-handedly. Forgive the pun!

  10. Re:Bad times for Red Hat! by Imperator · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it just me, or would The Fedora Affair be a great title for a cold war spy novel?

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  11. Re:What's the point? by mrhartwig · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.

    This is slashdot -- you'll be corrected even if you are correct.