Slashdot Mirror


BusinessWeek on Opening Apple's iTunes DRM

hype7 writes "BusinessWeek is running a very interesting story on Apple's foray into music, with a different bent to everyone else's. BW suggests that, instead of opening the iPod up to the world, Apple should instead license its DRM - 'Fairplay' - to anyone who wants to start up a music store. The upside is obvious: it would mean that Apple's music format, AAC, would become ubiquitous; Apple could quite feasibly make money on licensing fees (say 1 cent per song sold); and, it would just happen to stick it to Microsoft and the Windows Media Format. As the iTunes Music Store isn't running at a profit (or forecast to make a big one), having the Music Store clones eat into Apple's existing market share wouldn't be a problem; all these stores would be doing is building a bigger potential market for the iPod."

4 of 489 comments (clear)

  1. switch( DRM ) by startup.cmd · · Score: 0, Troll
    Okay, we have the choice between MS's DRM or Apple's DRM. Being a dutiful Slashdot user, I guess I'm supposed to hate MS's DRM? We hate Apple today, right? Honestly, what is so wrong with Microsoft's DRM implementation?

    --

  2. Re:So... by WhiskerTheMad · · Score: 0, Troll

    Are there any plans for iPod to support ogg vorbis? I've been thinkin about getting a portable music device, and I've heard lots of good things about the iPod. Ogg support would put it over the top for me, since i wouldn't have to re-rip all my music :)

    --
    Love your country always, but respect your government only when it deserves it. -- Mark Twain
  3. Re:While... by sirdude · · Score: 0, Troll

    I find it rather pathetic when everybody jumps at everything that might offer some sort of alternative to a M$ product/format. Esp. when it is Apple. I daresay that had M$ not been as successful as they are today, it would be Apple getting it in the arse everytime they incline themselves at angles greater than 5 degrees. I'm no M$ flag-carrier, but I find it annoying when people dislike Microsoft, but support another company full of equally insitutional techno-babble :S

    Apple make way too expensive computers that usually are more hype than anything else.. Their software is very expensive, ugly and buggy.. They too take their customers for a ride, and can be just as obnoxious a company as their lost brethren over at M$..

    There's no need for yet another propietary (?) format in the market (esp. one associated with Quicktime :S), and those who invest in it for the sole reason that it is not a M$ product need to be tarred and feathered .. :S People should plainly not support anything even remotely associated with DRM - boycott 'em all, just the same way as everyone should boycott anything vaguely associated with biometrics..

    Where are open standards when you need them? </rant>
  4. Re:AAC by mrklin · · Score: 0, Troll
    And for the nth time, AAC is a closed and proprietary codec owned solely by Dolby Laboratories. In that respect, it is no different than WMA (Microsoft), RA (Real), ATRAC (Sony), and MP3 (FH), each one of them owned by a corporation.

    As for it being a standard, every company calls its implementation the standard (Sony- Betamax). As a consumer, I decide what is the standard.