Slashdot Mirror


Boolean Logic : George Boole's The Laws of Thought

Ian writes "The Globe and Mail has a piece about the man behind Boolean Logic - George Boole - The Isaac Newton of logic. 'It was 150 years ago that George Boole published his classic The Laws of Thought, in which he outlined concepts that form the underpinnings of the modern high-speed computer.'"

8 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sneaky political criticism and genius-bashing by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a bit confused why you mention the BBC...

  2. "pre-digital computers"?? by classicvw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Also that year, Grace Hopper, an admiral in the U.S. Navy, recorded the first computer "bug" -- a moth stuck between the relays of a pre-digital computer.)"

    Ahh, but relays are digital.... They are either on or off. That was binary the last I looked.

  3. correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Parent post is completely wrong. The complete title is actually "An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, on which are founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities".

  4. Shakespeare published first by oever · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To be or not to be!

    While that's a pretty clumsy way of saying, it, Shakespeare was ahead of Boole.

    I suggest we all add the following statement (or equivalent) to our code in honor of this great mind.

    typedef bool shakespear;

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
  5. Re:Isaac Newton of modern computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Isaac Newton of LOGIC. Not modern computers.

    RTF Post.

  6. Re:AND before OR? by Fred+Foobar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's probably the same reason multiplication has a higher precedence than addition. Multiplication and AND are equivalents, and addition and OR are equivalents.

    In fact, for most practical purposes, AND *is* multiplication and OR *is* addition. Just compare the truth tables with multiplication and addition tables (one minor technicality, of course, is that addition carries while OR does not; the carry bit is simply the result of A AND B).

    --
    It was a really good paper.
  7. Re:AND before OR? by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Intuitively, checking if the elements of a set are all true should have presedens over checking if one of them is true.

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  8. Re:Isaac Newton of modern computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can't say Ritchie was much of an Isaac Newton type. Creative and productive? Yes. Genius? No.

    Knuth, very intelligent and productive but his original contributions were not huge.

    von Neumann is a good one, as is Turing.