Slashdot Mirror
X-43A Hits Mach 7
quiggy writes "As previously reported, NASA tested the X-43A yesterday. The results are in, and the scramjet hit Mach 7, setting a new speed record. CNN is also reporting the story, with a note that a similar jet could be tested by the end of the year, hopefully reaching Mach 10."
Of course, rockets launched into space have to travel at least 11.18 km/s to reach escape velocity, which is a lot faster than mach 7. This isnt a speed record, really more of a design change in that the engine doesn't need to carry its own oxygen.
Congrats to NASA though.
http://almostsmart.com
I've always been under the impression that escape velocity is if a projectile was fired at ground level, and has no boosting at any later point. Space rockets are continiously accelerated upwards, and thus dont need to reach such speeds.
when will we see warp engines? Shortly after someone proves that its not impossible I guess.
Turns out oxygen is heavy, and kind of a pain in the ass to package anyway. It's much more convienent if you can just use the oxygen that's laying about, which is significantly more difficult that it sounds when you're traveling at hypersonic speeds.
Damn gravity.
Yes, we've done Mach 7 before. And the space shuttles & space probes go much faster. The big deal is the engine. It's like comparing a nuke to some kilotons of TNT. Sure they may have the same effect (Mach 7), but one is simply a gigantic waste of resources (fuel), the other is a valuable invention. And considering it's the military, for good or bad...
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
good work scientists :)
ENGINEERS had more to do with getting this ship up to Mach 7 that did the scientists!
Alcubierre's idea was that the ship doesn't move. Instead, it modifies the space around it much like an esclator.
I'm with you so far.
However, at this time, there was a problem with obtaining the required energy, which was quite alot [think total solar output of the sun in its current life, per second].
The main stumbling block to Alcubierre's drive is that it requires negative energy. My understanding is that the human race can't produce that right now, at least in appreciable quantities.
All of the FTL drive concepts that I've seen involve something currently unobtainable (or outright impossible) like this - infinitely long neutronium rods, creation of a pocket universe to put the ship in, etc.
In 1999, however, Thomas Valone spotted an answer. Zero Point Energy.
No. Pseudo-science can solve lots of problems theoretically, but it is not the answer to real-world problems.
"...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
http://www.mech.uq.edu.au/hyper/hyshot/:
9 :
As the spent motor and its attached payload falls back to Earth, they gather speed, and the trajectory is designed so that between 35km and 23km, they are travelling at Mach 7.6
http://www.uq.edu.au/news/index.phtml?article=346
The recent HyShot(TM) launch was designed to take the scramjet engine to a speed of Mach 7.6 (or more than seven times the speed of sound) for the experiment, using a Terrier Orion rocket. The rocket and payload reached an altitude of 314km before the rocket was configured to fly in a new trajectory pointing the payload back down to earth.
HyShot was simply free-falling to earth in order to reach Mach 7.6 so the engine could be ignited. It achieved that speed regardless of whether or not the scramjet fired. The X-43 was flying horizontally, and was actually powered by the scramjet engine during a controlled flight.
So there is a difference between what was accomplished. The distinction is that HyShot achieved combustion, while the X-43 was the first scramjet powered craft to be flown.
Dan East
Better known as 318230.