Infinium vs. HardOCP Court Docs
jtcm writes "In a follow-up to several previous articles, The Inquirer has obtained a copy of of the suit filed in the Infinium vs. HardOCP case. It's certainly worth perusal."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
According to Infinium:
A. The facts in HardOCP's article were false and could be readily determined to be false with the most minimal of investigation.
B. They lost venture capital because of the HardOCP article.
Now, unless the court is willing to believe that all of those investors made their decisions solely on the basis of one single article on a game website without investigating either the statements made in the article or the company itself, both A. and B. cannot both be true.
Plus of course nobody trusts a company that says "We've got this great thingie, we won't let you see it, but it's real, honest it is!"
Perhaps the Phantom is the platform that Dawn will run on?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a box with a blue light inside.