Slashdot Mirror


Pigeons' Bandwidth Advantage Quantified

An anonymous reader submits "A well documented test took place in the north of Israel, in presence of several dozen Internet geeks and experts. During the test, 3 homing pigeons carried 4 GB (gigabytes) for 100 km distance, achieving, what apparently looks as pigeons' world record in data transfer to a given distance. Bandwidth achieved by the pigeons was 2.27 Mbps...Transferring a similar volume of information through a common uplink of ADSL line would have taken no less than 96 hours..."

4 of 462 comments (clear)

  1. The obvious question is... by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...African, or European?

  2. Re:packet loss? by Lev13than · · Score: 0, Redundant

    pong **** CARRIER LOST

    Don't you mean CARRIER PIGEON LOST?

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
  3. Re:Mandatory joke by mugamba · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Was it african or european?

  4. Re:latency v. bandwidth by egomaniac · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You would be correct, using the term bandwidth loosely, if the number of pigeons stayed constant. However, using the strict definition, bandwidth is totally unrelated to line latency/round trip time.

    So, basically, what you are saying is "If you define 'bandwidth' according to a strict and unusual definition that nobody actually uses in real life, I'm precisely correct."

    I don't care what your book or professor said bandwidth is defined as. In real life people define the word "bandwidth" to mean "the amount of data that can be transmitted per unit of time". Until now, I have never heard it used to mean anything else.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck