SCO's Motion to dismiss Red Hat's Complaint Denied
Posted by
ryuzaki0
on from the well-isn't-that-special dept.
Soko writes "The scoop is on Groklaw - SCO's motion to dismiss is denied, and further activity in the case is now pending the outcome of the SCO vs. IBM litigation in Utah. If they lose against IBM, will there be anything left for Red Hat to kick around, though?"
Agreeing with the poster that is about FUD, proving claims that this open source stuff is "messy" and the "IP is murky" and so many millions wasted on legal "issues" and even top lawyer(s) feeling there was "merit" to the issues.
Even with a clear lose, this suit stinks up the room for a long time and might even force some "splits" in the linux/BSD source tree (divide then conquer).
Slashdot Mirror
SCO is loose as a goose!
Agreeing with the poster that is about FUD, proving claims that this open source stuff is "messy" and the "IP is murky" and so many millions wasted on legal "issues" and even top lawyer(s) feeling there was "merit" to the issues.
Even with a clear lose, this suit stinks up the room for a long time and might even force some "splits" in the linux/BSD source tree (divide then conquer).
http://www.hawknest.com/