Slashdot Mirror


MagLev Trains Annoyingly Loud

crem_d_genes writes "You might hear that whistle blowing from that train coming 'round the bend, but tapes of the sounds produced by magnetically levitated and normal trains produced a result that was something of a surprise: Most people rated maglev trains as more disturbing than standard intercity trains. It had been previously known that the two types were about equally loud, but this study analyzed people's reactions to them. Since the effects on the environment will be part of the feasibilty studies for future development, acoustical engineers will have some new challenges. Some participants in the study said the sound made them 'feel insecure, some found it startling, and disliked the occasional shrill sound the maglevs produced.' The researcher postulated that unfamiliarity with the noise might be part of the problem."

31 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. Audio links by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anyone know of links to audio samples of a maglev? I've never heard one and some rudimentary googling didn't turn them up.

  2. Noise Qualities by toxic666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The quality of the noise source is as important as its intensity (i.e. decibels). Some noise patterns are just plain annoying. For instance, in noise studies, helicopters are considered more annoying and have lower acceptable decibel thresholds; the old Hueys are a prime example.

    1. Re:Noise Qualities by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For instance, in noise studies, helicopters are considered more annoying...

      Maybe it's a Pavlovian response. The sound of an old Huey is basically that of a machine either coming to kill you or coming to carry you off to be killed.

      The huge whirling blades are subliminal reinforcements of the motif of the 'grim reaper'.

    2. Re:Noise Qualities by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Some noise patterns are just plain annoying
      Quite right. My favorite example: a dripping faucet. This noise can be very faint; just on the edge of what you can still hear. But be honest: when you're lying in bed, as soon as you have identified the source of that faint, constant tapping, you just have to get up and turn off that faucet!

      In contrast, a running AC can make quite a bit of noise, but the sound is continuous and similar to white noise. Almost no-one has trouble falling asleep to the sound of an AC, in fact, if you are being kept awake by a dripping faucet or other noises, switch on the AC and its noise may drown out the rest, allowing you to sleep. (I know, not the most environmentally sound solution...)

      That's the problem with sound pollution laws: they only take sound levels into account.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Noise Qualities by delus10n0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me of the Stuka dive bombers of WWII, where the wheel/gear coverings had wind-powered sirens in them.. when they were making a pass, you'd hear it! I don't recall where I read it, but I believe Hitler was the one to come up with the idea, and actually required all Stukas to have this feature.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  3. Odd thing about trains... by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can anyone explain this to me about um... "traditional" train sound, because I've always wondered: Why are they so loud at night? I know trains run through the city here regularly, and I can't hear the train whistles where I live during the day, even though I know they still toot them, but at night I can here the trains that have got to be at least ten miles from here. Why is that?

    I would be curious if the sound of these kinds of trains carried in the same way. Normal train whistles aren't really unpleasant, but I wouldn't want to be listening to screeching noises from several miles away while I was trying to sleep. (The fact that I usually sleep during the day is irrelevant. =P)

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:Odd thing about trains... by Boccaccio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it is just because the ambient noise level tends to be lower during the night so you hear the trains more easily.

    2. Re:Odd thing about trains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not just cars, but wind.

      In the middle of the night there is no solar heating.

      Have you noticed that during the day there is almost always a breeze (which generates low levels of noise), but often on a clear night there is a dead calm.

    3. Re:Odd thing about trains... by dj245 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When a city is on the move during the day, all the cars effectively produce a blanket of white noise that reduces your perception of all the other sounds.

      White noise is a very good thing if you want to not hear certain sounds. In some doctor's offices they have little noisemakers that plug in and just make a little whirring noise. They serve absolutely no other purpose at all. They just obscure the conversations between the patients and the receptionists.

      I employ a similar technique to reduce the apparent noise I notice from the dorm hallway. I don't actually buy special noisemakers though, instead I have several computers and lots and lots of fans. It works fairly well to drown out talking, but it doesn't get rid of the booming bass from the neighbors.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re:Odd thing about trains... by Reverberant · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why are they so loud at night? I know trains run through the city here regularly, and I can't hear the train whistles where I live during the day, even though I know they still toot them, but at night I can here the trains that have got to be at least ten miles from here. Why is that?

      If there is a large body of water between you and the train tracks, or if you're in an area with weird cooling characteristics, you might be hearing the effects of a temperature inversion.

      Air temperatures right above large bodies of water tend to be cooler then the surrounding air. Similarly, there might be some areas near you that cool more rapidly at night than other areas. These effects cause layers of air at different temperatures, which set up an impedance mismatch.

      Sound that travels through the air bounce off these temperature inversions, which can 'bend' sound toward you. Combine this effect with lower ambient noise levels at night, and you find that you can sometime hear noise sources at far distances.

      See here for an explanation.

    5. Re:Odd thing about trains... by jhagler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of these exist in workplaces as well. If you're ever up in the plenum and notice what appear to be paint cans hanging around, they're white noise generators. They have become very popular in cube land as you no longer have to listen to absolutely everyone else's conversations

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
  4. White noise generators? by RailGunner · · Score: 3, Interesting
    They have these white noise generators that help filter out noises in a cubicle farm, they work by disrupting all sound waves and getting them to cancel out. Maybe there's a way to attach something similar to a MagLev train.

    Of course, if it works too well it'll sound like someone's letting the air out of every tire in the block...

    1. Re:White noise generators? by gclef · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those aren't actually cancelling the noise you're hearing, they're just masking it. Basically, it's not that it's quieter in your office, but the noise floor is higher, burying the annoying sounds in white noise.

      The same thing happens on airplanes. If you're ever flying somewhere, bring your walkman/mp3 player. Compare the volume you have it set to for normal use with what you have to crank it to when on the airplane. It's pretty disturbing how high the noise floor is on an airplane. (I wear earplugs on airplanes for just this reason.)

  5. I'd like to hear the sounds because ... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Though they suggest unfamilliarity, one might wonder if it's more of a frequency/pitch or timbre issue.

    The sound of a regular train (been a while since I've heard one) is rythmic, higher pitch clicking. I would guess that the maglev might be more lower frequency. Also, one might wonder if there's a sound beyond the range of human awareness that might be contributing to the feeling that the maglevs are "louder" or more annoying.

    I dunno ... you tend to feel louder high pitched sounds in your ears, whereas the lower ones you might feel more in your body.

    The author of this post would like to point out that unlike other posts, this one was more stream of thought, and less composed than his previous ones. In other words, he's talking out of his ass.

    1. Re:I'd like to hear the sounds because ... by elwinc · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'd like to hear them too. My guess is the more annoying sounds of maglevs have more high frequency components than traditional trains. there may be a fair amount of energy in very low freqency "thumps" coming from a traditional train. The maglev may be mostly hiss and whistles as the air streams over the body. Also, I'm guessing the maglev goes *much* faster than the wheeled train to make the same overall dbs of sound.

      In my experience, high frequencies (maybe 1000 to 4000 Hz) are more sonically salient than lows. Thats why sirens and car alarms put alot of energy in those bands.

      --
      --- Often in error; never in doubt!
    2. Re:I'd like to hear the sounds because ... by Reverberant · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Though they suggest unfamilliarity, one might wonder if it's more of a frequency/pitch or timbre issue.

      Having heard the TR08, I tend to disagree - the suckers are just loud at top speeds (although at low speeds, say <100mph, they are almost whisper quiet).

      One unanticipated effect is that at high speeds, the Maglev sound has a rapid onset, which causes a 'startle' effect. Basically, one moment your environment is quiet, the next moment it's very loud, and the moment after that it's quiet again as the vehicle recedes. This might be part of the problem.

      The FRA high-speed train noise guidelines try to account for this.

  6. Seems feasible to me. by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Conventional" trains make noises ranging from low rumbles (slower trains) to what resembles gigantic versions of the "fwooooooooosh" of a racecar passing you (Acela and other modern high-speed trains). But loud, high-pitched sounds coming from a piece of machinery (e.g. a train) could make people think the machine is out of control.

    High-pitched mechanical sounds carry a connotation of machinery operating "out of control", or running faster than it should. I'll put it this way. If you walked into, say, a widget factory, and heard the machines cranking away with a low rumble, wouldn't you feel more comfortable than if they were generating a constant high-pitched whining? In which scenario would you fear, deep down in your gut, that one of those machines is about to go haywire, break down, and shoot a cog in your general direction? This is regardless of the actual speed of the machinery. Low sounds are just less unnerving in this case. (Or so I feel...)

    Perhaps the sound of a maglev operating at 150mph would be more unnerving than that of an Acela train operating at 150mph since the nature of the maglev sounds would make it "sound like" it's more likely than the Acela to disrail (even though, as a maglev, it already is 'disrailed' in a sense ;) ) and crush the hapless onlooker...

    1. Re:Seems feasible to me. by idontgno · · Score: 2, Interesting
      High-pitched mechanical sounds carry a connotation of machinery operating "out of control", or running faster than it should. I'll put it this way. If you walked into, say, a widget factory, and heard the machines cranking away with a low rumble, wouldn't you feel more comfortable than if they were generating a constant high-pitched whining?

      That's an interesting insight. (I don't have mod points, so I'm word-modding. Mod Nazis, bite me.)

      The reason mechanical bits sound "wrong" when making high-pitched sounds is that the usual source high-pitch sound in conventional mechanics is friction. Friction sound means lubrication failure, usually followed quickly by breakdown (perhaps at speed, with attendant spontaneous ballistic self-disassembly).

      If I understand correctly, the high-frequency components of the "problem" sound of maglevs have absolutely nothing to do with friction. Au contraire, it has to do with frictionlessness (non-contact magnetically-maintained air bearing). So it makes no rational sense that perceived discomfort has anything to do with mechanical breakdown.

      But that doesn't mean it's not so. I imagine the reaction to the sound is visceral, not rational, so explaining that "No, it's not breaking down, it always sounds like that" won't help.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  7. The sounds of silence? Oh, planes, trains, cars... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Some participants in the study said the sound made them 'feel insecure, some found it startling, and disliked the occasional shrill sound the maglevs produced.' The researcher postulated that unfamiliarity with the noise might be part of the problem."
    Given time, people can become comfortable with anything. Who woulda thunk that we could sleep through traffic noise, normal rail noise, low-flying jet aircraft etc?

    Where once upon a time new technologies were just introduced, we now run the risk of getting them bludgeoned to death by special-interest groups and environmental impact statements. There is no reason why in time maglev sounds should not become a familiar part of the soundscape, barely noticed if at all, and a realisation that people might be uncomfortable with something just because it is new may help us determine whether something really is damaging or if it's just a baseless case of NIMBY (as opposed to "it really is damaging, so get it the fuck away from me") when people oppose something new.

    (aplogies if this is incoherent... it's been three hours since my last coffee)

  8. Primate sound response by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if it's perhaps as simple as our built-in responses to shrill sounds.

    Primates tend to make more shrill prolonged sounds when in distress. We are likely hard wired to go on alert when we hear distressed sounds from another primate. That would explain uneasy feelings and rating the sound as more intrusive and objectionable than a rumble and clicking sound which would be fairly meaningless to the lower parts of the brain.

    It's a two fold problem that will likely call for psychologists and neurologists to determine what is so distressing and annoying about the sound, and then accoustic engineers to figure out how to alter the sound so that it no longer has that characteristic.

    Nothing more than a hypothesis here, but quite testable.

  9. Re:The sounds of silence? Oh, planes, trains, cars by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I remember seeing a documentary several years ago in which the first steam engines were considered scary "fire breathing metal dragons that crawled up the hillside . . . " Many people would not go near them. . .

    Edison marched men with lightbulbs on their heads through a parade in New York . . . this scared the willy's out of many people because they associated light with fire and thought that these mens' heads were on fire . . .

    As new technology becomes familiar, these things become less disturbing and finally commonplace. I assume that the same would happen with sound from mag-lev's . . .

  10. Re:freight trains by MCZapf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interestingly (to me, at least) cattle are now apparently spooked if a steam locomotive goes by. They just aren't used to them anymore.

  11. What about duration? by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The duration of a train traveling at 60 mph is more annoying than a Maglev train of equal length travling 250 mph, simply because you have to put up with it longer.

    Sure the sound is annoying, but if it is gone in 15 seconds as opposed to 1 minute, I think people would get used to it.

    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  12. Track Design by markxz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looking at some of the pictures of Maglev Trains, the track resembled a concreet trough, rather than the conventional flat rail/roadway track. This would cause the air (and sound) movements to be altered and possibly create a different sound

  13. We can decide what's okay and what's not by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Where once upon a time new technologies were just introduced, we now run the risk of getting them bludgeoned to death by special-interest groups and environmental impact statements.

    You're so right. For example, I have a new technique for extracting gold -- GOLD, I tells ya! -- from common sewage. It involves simply blasting a stream of "quicksilver" through the municipal sewer once a night. The quicksilver bonds with the fluxion and good humors in gold that's suspended in the water as a result of toothbrushes rubbing it free from people's fillings. That scraping, rushing noise may be excruciating for you at first, but you'll adjust.

    What, you mean I should have to prove that it works and that you're not going to die of mercury poisoning as a result of my new process? C'mon... once upon a time, I could just have introduced it without all these environmental "special interests" getting in the way. What kind of a world do we live in?? You're stifling my innovation. And here I was going to generously offer to sponsor a public park for your kids with my earnings.

    Seriously, don't you think there's a balance to be struck here? Doesn't seem to me like asking the question "Maglev trains are perceived as having a more disturbing sound -- Why?" is a sign that ingenuity is dead. Personally I like living in a world where airports need to think about the noise produced by their traffic patterns. If we figure out what quality these trains might have that makes their sounds more irritating, we can decide whether to do something about it and how much it'd cost. No harm done.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  14. The Acela train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say, I live in the city right next to an Acela track, and it's one of the most amazing things I've seen. The tracks in question have MBTA (commuter rail) trains, Acela express trains, and T (above-ground) subway cars pass by on a regular basis.

    The loudest and most annoying are the dilapidated orange line subway cars, which are very old and make a lot of clicks and clacks and screeches. The commuter rail is definitely louder, but it is uch more pleasant - a bassy rumbling, depending ont he speed, maybe more ominous if you don't know what it is. The Acela is QUIET in comparison - it seems as if the only thing you can hear (not true, of course, but comparatively) is the air being so violently pushed around as it whooshes by. And it's so quick (when not even at full speed in the city) that it's almost tantalizing, making you wish you could see it for a little longer. It's almost like an arrow shot from a bow, it sneaks up on you as you can't hear the rumbling as it approaches, and then it's gone by so fast you're almost not sure if you really heard it in the first place.

  15. Some helicopters are engineered for noise.. by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as in the sound they make is used to instill fear and such. There are some real interesting uses of noise.

    Of course what helicopters sound like in movies is usually different than in real life. Friends of mine can tell you what chopper is coming just by the sound from the blades.

    That being said, instead of masking the sound of the train perhaps they can tune it to sound more pleasant :)

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  16. You've got the bends by shmert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who lives in the Bay Area and is a Mr. Bungle fan recognize the similarity between the BART trains in the east bay and the sound of nitrogen bubbles a-popping in "The Bends"? It's easily the most painful song I've ever heard (and sadly missing from the iTunes store, or I'd provide a link).

    I suspect that the "bends" sound at the end of the song is actually just a sample of the BART trains which has been digitally tweaked a bit. Seems like a somewhat telling relationship about the nerve-grating qualities of the sound of trains.

    --
    You drank my drink, you drunk!
  17. the noise is likely caused by the chop frequency by gemtech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    (Pulse Width Modulation, PWM) of the power to the electromagnets. That frequency can be changed, within limits. I've been on mag-levs at Kings Island (Ohio) years ago, they are a bit annoying.

    --
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  18. Efficiency and Noise Levels. by qualico · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Noise of any type is a result of some inefficiency somewhere. Be it the air displacement from poorly developed skins and attachments or transforming the electricity with inexpensive components. I'm sure they can isolate the offending noise and design it out of the equation. Still did not get a good answer on here as to what exactly was causing the noise. Although there is some good speculation.

  19. Did people like steam engines when they came out? by martinde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm thinking 100 years ago the sound of a steam engine freaked out the locals, their farm animals, etc. I think that the speculation about "it's just unfamiliar" is probably dead on.