The Pure Software Act of 2006
lurker412 writes "The MIT Technology Review features a proposal by Simson Garfinkel to provide honest labels on software in the same way that the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 forced manufacturers of foods and drugs to divulge the contents of their products. The proposal targets adware, spyware and other unsavory practices. It suggests that by requiring software manufacturers to include clear icons for each nasty behavior--rather than hide the disclosures in seldom read or understood click-through SLAs--end users will be better protected. Garfinkel specifically lists eight types of sneaky behavior, but the list is not meant to be exhaustive."
How do you fit all those icons onto MS packaging?
Did your ivory tower come equiped with an ivory backscratcher? And if so, where can I buy one?
1. Hook: Runs at Boot
Check
2. Dial: Places a Phone Call
Activation procedure, Messenger, etc.
3. Modify: Alters Your Computer's Operating System
Duh. It *is* the OS.
4. Monitor: Keeps Track of What You're Doing
Windows Media player / IE's index.dat come to mind.
5. Displays Pop-Ups
At least before XP SP2 comes out.
6. Remote Control: Lets Other Programs Take Over Your Computer
Just how many exploits *are* there at the moment?
7. Self-Updates: This Program May Change Its Behavior
Windows Update, anybody?
8. Stuck: Cannot be Uninstalled
Unless you count formatting the hard drive as such.
Plus Apple participates in the bad software patent practices that discourage freedom and innovation. And they claimed to support fair use, but turned their back on it with ITMS. They are not a nice company.
How about make it mandatory that the box with the text be resizable, and require a reasonable font size. Anyone seen a program (or a web page offering a service) that uses 8 point font for it's license agreement? Small fonts are entirely unnecessary when real paper is not being used.