Slashdot Mirror


RIAA's Nasty Easter Egg

Bruha writes "It appears the RIAA is being very low key about the fact that the five major labels think that 99 cents per song is too cheap, and are discussing a price hike that would increase the tariff to $1.25 up to $2.99 per song. I was a huge fan of the 99c per song, but if they think that they can raise the price on me just because I don't buy full CDs anymore, they've got another thing coming. Suggestion: make good CDs, and maybe I'll buy the whole thing."

17 of 817 comments (clear)

  1. Definitions from the future: by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Record company execs: A bunch of greedy fucking bastards who were among the first against the wall when the revolution came.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  2. What's the big problem? by MongooseCN · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is a capitalist country! If you don't like one company's price, go to another company and buy their product instead! So if you don't like the RIAA's prices then go to... uh... hmmm... fuck.

  3. Re:And if it's 10 bucks a song - so what? by SuperMo0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not poor, but I have much better things to spend 10 dollars on than whatever Britney Spears has moaned out recently.

  4. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the worst deal i've found on itunes has been .99 for a 4 second interlude track (janet jackson, i think

    Thanks God, It could be much worse: imagine 3 minutes of Janet Jackson ... Brrr!

  5. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by Robmonster · · Score: 4, Funny

    I havent used iTunes myself, but I would have expected then to make allowances for track length....

    Mind you, that leaves Meatloaf fans open to having to pay $10 per track since his songs are so long...

    Do you get to see the track length before downloading the file?

    --
    I have no sig yet I must scream.
  6. Gonna Outsource Those Assholes to India by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet there are a bunch of Indian artists who will sell me music tracks for .50 a track. Stick THAT in your crack pipe and smoke it, RIAA!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Gonna Outsource Those Assholes to India by wheresdrew · · Score: 2, Funny
      They already have!

      You mean you haven't been stocking up on Dahler Mendi CDs?

      http://omgwtf.superlime.com/tunak.rm

  7. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I bet he didn't even get to see a tit.

  8. Re:These guys... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps their bussiness plan is this:

    1)Announce possible big price increase.
    2)People quickly buy more music before the increase.
    3)profit!
    4)Occasionaly remind people of possible price increase.
    5)goto 2

  9. Re:They are killing themselves slowly by joFFeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    killing me softly with his song?

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  10. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by MKalus · · Score: 4, Funny
    The receiver would be equipped with a long-term correlator that would basically say, "If I've heard this segment of audio within the last 24 hours, don't record it."


    So this means you get five songs each day? Every day? In what way would that be better than radio itself (well, minus the fact that you get rid of those stupid DJs.
    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  11. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't someone own the copyright to silence? :^P

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  12. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not sure, but Simon and Garfunkel have the sound of it locked down. :-)

  13. Re:Copyright on silence by guiscard · · Score: 2, Funny


    I also like the quote:

    "Mine is a much better silent piece. I have been able to say in one minute what Cage could only say in four minutes and 33 seconds."

  14. Re:$33 cd? It is going to decrease profit by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Translation: If you're enough of a moron to buy 99 cents worth of fuck all, you got what you paid for you cretinous pillock.

    Or in nicer terms, "white space != good investment" :)

  15. Re:Mixing the good and the bad. by crashfrog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do people listen to songs from a band that can only turn out "3 or 4 good tracks", when you could buy an alblum from a good band and get an entire CDs worth of good music?

    You might as well ask "why would you eat at the Chinese place that only has 3 or 4 good dishes when you could eat at the Mexican place that has a menu's worth of good dishes?"

    Well, duh. Because I like Chinese better than I like Mexican (or whatever.) You listen to those 3 or 4 good songs because you like them better than that other band's entire album.

    Maybe you should try looking at sources other than MTV for what you want to listen to.

    Maybe that's too much fuckin' work. Not everybody has the time to make sure their taste is up to your discriminating standards, Mr. Culture Police.

    --
    I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
    If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
  16. Re:Didn't go to trial, so... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone's heard his music.

    I mean, 4'33"... who hasn't heard that? ;)

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)