Slashdot Mirror


Creative Commons Audiobooks

xanderwilson writes "The New York Times (2nd half of the article; free reg. required as always) writes, 'Project Gutenberg is well known for offering free electronic versions of famous public-domain texts. Now Telltale Weekly wants to be its audio-book equivalent.' Of interest to others in the Slashdot community: Ogg Vorbis and MP3 downloads, payment via Bitpass micropayments, and a cheap-now, free later (with a Creative Commons License) business model." (And if you buy the Ogg Vorbis versions, part of the money goes to xiph.org.)

138 comments

  1. OoOoOoo! by Liselle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What a neat idea, I've been looking for some portable culture for my daily commute. But putting the full text of a book on my iPod is tedious (limit on Note size), not to mention really annoying to read, and impossible to do while driving.

    It's cheap and has no DRM, so if it's also decent quality, sign me up.

    --
    Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    1. Re:OoOoOoo! by nkh · · Score: 1

      I first thought about blind people who don't have an easy access to audio books (but of course, the entertaining part of this project is good too).

    2. Re:OoOoOoo! by cgranade · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is the sort of thing that makes me just feel all warm and fuzzy inside. Open source format, using public domain works, eventually releasing under CC, and making money! No DRM needed or used, and proving that if you let people, they'll be perfectly willing to abide by such terms.
      /me runs off to buy "The Kiss."

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

    3. Re:OoOoOoo! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What a neat idea, I've been looking for some portable culture for my daily commute

      You must not have looked very hard:

      cat something.txt | festival --tts | lame - something.mp3

      or something like that, I don't remember on top of my head.

      I used to do that to get the news in my mp3 player automatically in the morning before hitting the road. Of course, it's not very convincing when it tells you something extremely sad or exciting, but it's understandable.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    4. Re:OoOoOoo! by nandhp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I found a solution to this: iPodLibrary. It automatically chops up your notes into little "Chapters" and supports TXT, PDF, LIT, and Windows (not Linux).

    5. Re:OoOoOoo! by cgranade · · Score: 4, Informative

      They make an exception for the blind. You may, if you have purchased one copy, make unlimited copies for the blind provided that you limit access to those additional copies.
      Read more.

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

  2. what is Ogg Vorbis? by Face+the+Facts · · Score: 3, Informative

    what the f&*^#$ is ogg? Some stupid linux invention?

    From their site: "Ogg Vorbis is a completely open, patent-free, professional audio encoding and streaming technology with all the benefits of Open Source." In other words, it has better compression than mp3, and since it's open source, you don't have to pay licensing fees on players that decode Ogg like you would with mp3.

    --
    -- BSD or Bust
    1. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "since it's open source, you don't have to pay licensing fees on players that decode Ogg like you would with mp3"

      Colour me stupid, but I don't pay any license fees to run my mp3 players. So who does pay?

      And "better compression than mp3" is pure flamebait if I ever heard it. There are numerous test which shows that Ogg is superior in some types of sounds, but mp3 is better than others.

    2. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Face+the+Facts · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Colour me stupid, but I don't pay any license fees to run my mp3 players. So who does pay?

      Yet.

      every content provider is looking to incorporate more and more DRM as the quality, cost, and ease of creation of copies improves.

      the music industry doesn't care about people copying songs off the radio. it didn't even really get its panties in a bunch when CD-Rs first hit the market. or when mp3s hit the ftp servers. It went ballistic when anyone could download a single application and instantly find a never ending stream of perceptibility loss-less perfect digital copies.

      likewise with the MPAA and DVD encryption, likewise with the new Cable Set-top standard.

      They want to cut out MythTV, Tivo, splitters, H-cards, and cable descramblers. It's becoming too easy to get at the current data, so they want a change.

      with the analog system working (fairly) well as is, why else would they create a new 'standard' for the digital system? It certainly isn't in the interest of the consumer.

      Why doesn't Sony support the Blu-Ray with its stock rewritable feature?
      Why did Disney/Circuit City/et al try to push (the bad) Divx onto the market in the first place?

      It isn't because consumers are clamoring for less control or cheaper movies.

      The time is coming when content producers are going to have to realize that their profits will no longer come from format-updates (repurchasing 8-tracks as CDs, VHS classics as DVDs, etc), and will -not- come from service-style access to data. Classic TV advertising may even have to give way to pure product-placement campaigns.

      Cable will realize that a move to pay-per-channel is the way to support content without advertising in our new time-shifted digital reality. Some people -will- pay $1/mo for TLC. Home Depot will still pay for product placements in Trading Spaces. Maybe the Super-station will go away - but the cable companies, and popular channels, need not.

      the film industry has already shown that the theatre experience is not losing out to cheap cam copies. they've learned that feature-rich dvds or dirt-cheap dvds are preferred to the customer over hacked-together recompressed copies on filesharing networks.

      The record companies will need to realize that to win with digital music requires providing the best quality, with the least hassle. They will need to realize that they must beat file-sharing on features. People will give up hunting around for a good (not mislabeled)256kbps rip of Britney's newest song - if they know they can just hit iTunes or its ilk and cough up $1.

      Fair Use needs to win out. These purported 'losses' from file-sharing need to be revealed to be grossly overestimated fabrications. (A PSA from a supposed union set painter claiming that file sharing is killing the movie industry, and threatening his job - airing during it's highest grossing year of all time is particularly tactless)

      DRM is the tool of the content dinosaur. If they concentrated on actual content piracy rings - where big money is being made off black-market copies, and abandoned their fruitless DRM research - their profits could be higher than ever.

      But such is not the reaction of anti-competitive cabals. Being forced to -compete- is not what they do. Suing, threatening, bullying, bribing - these are the blunt instruments they wield instead of the precise tools of innovation, imagination and competition.

      So in the meantime - expect every advance to carry DRM in the fine print.

      --
      -- BSD or Bust
    3. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And what idiot moderator modded this "informative"? he was responding to no-one at all. This is blatant karma-whoring.

      MOD PARENT DOWN

    4. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [I don't pay any license fees to run my mp3 players] Yet.

      Perhaps I'm overconfident, but I'm fairly sure that nobody's going to show up at my house and demand a check to pay for the continued use of my iPod.

      [much ranting]

      I read it twice, but I guess I missed the part where you answered the question. I don't pay to use either my iPod or iTunes; both include MP3 encoding and playback. (Also AAC, which I also don't pay for.) So why should I give a damn that Ogg is free? It's not easier to use (it's considerably harder), it's not demonstrably superior (it's a wash at best), so what's the big whoop?

      (I know what the argument is for OEM's and whatnot. I'm trying to get at what the argument is for end-users. Or, if that doesn't work, convince you to stop trying to tout Ogg as some kind of competitive advantage all by itself and to concentrate on the stuff that actually matters.)

      --

      I write in my journal
    5. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Monx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps I'm overconfident, but I'm fairly sure that nobody's going to show up at my house and demand a check to pay for the continued use of my iPod.

      Of course not. Apple already paid it for you -- which means you paid when you bought it. All legal mp3 players have to pay for a license. They just pass it on to you in the price of your player. Windows users don't have to pay the "Microsoft Tax" themselves when they buy a new computer, it's included in the price.

    6. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An ogg file encoded at 80kbps has the same quality as an mp3 file encoded at 128kbps. I know this means nothing if you use a tons-of-GB iPod, but for someone like me who uses a PocketPC with a SD card of only 64Mb ogg allows me to put in nearly twice the songs I'd be able to put if I used mp3.
      mp3 is old, sounds terrible at low-ish bitrates and is propietary. I don't see any reason whatsoever to use mp3 when there's ogg.

      Only when I can play ogg vorbis with an iPod (maybe when that linux-on-iPod project is more advanced) i'll consider buying one.

    7. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by xanderwilson · · Score: 1
      Only when I can play ogg vorbis with an iPod (maybe when that linux-on-iPod project is more advanced) i'll consider buying one.

      Help speed up the process: iPod feedback/feature request form.

    8. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually you did pay. You paid when you bought your iPod, and you pay when you buy from iTunes. Or rather Apple paid and passed the cost on to you. Now it's not a huge cost, but it's there.
      I like Ogg primarily because it's a better format, it compresses a bit better, is much more flexible, and has other usefull features.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    9. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple already paid it for you -- which means you paid when you bought it. All legal mp3 players have to pay for a license. They just pass it on to you in the price of your player.

      How much did it cost me? Let's say I paid $300 for my iPod; how much of that $300 went to the MP3 playback license?

      This fails to address iTunes, of course. I didn't pay for that at all, and yet it includes a licensed MP3 encoder. So that doesn't quite add up.

      What I'm getting at is this: the fact that Ogg doesn't cost anything to license doesn't matter to the end user. Not at all. So if you want to use Ogg as a selling point, you're going to have to come up with something better than "it's cheap."

      --

      I write in my journal
    10. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What I don't get is why they didn't choose Ogg Speex, a codec that is similarly Free, but aimed especially at voice recordings.

    11. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by xanderwilson · · Score: 4, Informative

      I considered this initially and I'm suprised that of all the feedback requests for other formats, this is the first time anyone has publicly or privately requested Speex.

      Mainly it's the lack of support for Speex (I know, I know. Something has to come first, the chicken or the egg.) in devices and software. But I figure the more popular Ogg Vorbis gets (and the more support Xiph.org gets) the more likely Speex will eventually become a complimentary standard. While Ogg Vorbis was designed for music, not voice, it's still a better alternative than MP3.

      For the "fundraising" part of this audiobook project, a third format Telltale might offer would most likely be AAC, based on user requests. But I do intend to eventually support Speex for free works.

      Alex.

    12. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that songs on the iTunes Music Store are encoded in AAC and hence not subject to the same licensing agreements as MP3.

    13. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Enahs · · Score: 1
      Colour me stupid, but I don't pay any license fees to run my mp3 players.

      I'll happily color you stupid. If you're playing MP3s with a free-for-download MP3 player, then no, I guess you're not, but someone is. If you have a hardware player, or are using an available-with-the-OS player such as iTunes, then yes, you paid for it, just as you help pay for driver development (Windows and MacOS drivers aren't free, even if they appear to be.)

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    14. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by lingenfr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also wondered about Speex. I signed up with Bitpass, but don't have enough bandwidth to download a book yet. I am wondering if they do music and soundeffects backgrounds to their reading. If so, some folks wouldn't like what Speex does to the music. I have used Speex to encode some talkradio. I am no expert and did not monkey with all of the settings, but there was a noticeable difference in voice quality (not that bothered me) but when music started playing in the background it was poor and broken.

      Just a thought. I too would like to have the option of Speex. I am hoping to be able to play Speex files on my Neuros some day. If not, I am happy with my Oggs.

    15. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If they concentrated on actual content piracy rings...

      They wouldn't enjoy the market saturation they have now. It was piracy that made it possible for Microsoft and Adobe and the entertainment industry to become as big as they are. I'm sure that you know the routine. For them, piracy was free advertising and distribution of thier product.

      --
      What?
    16. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      But can you decompile iTunes and use it for your own purposes? I don't think so. That's where Ogg Vorbis works for me. Sure, that's not your average user's needs, and I'm not an average user. But I'm also not foolish enough to spend $300 on something that's just going to be a piece of rubbish in a few years.

      If the Apple product works for you ad you happen to be wealthy enough to afford it, fine. But don't try and dissuade others from choosing an alternative that is substantially better for their own needs. Ogg Vorbis is just what the doctor ordered for someone like me. I can't afford to waste money on something that really doesn't give me much more than a discman. Everyone else can have their end-use,r prepackaged middling quality products. You are more than welcome to buy into that. But you are not welcome to try and sour people's opinions against something that may work for them.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    17. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      But can you decompile iTunes and use it for your own purposes? I don't think so.

      Don't need to. Apple provides you with a complete and stunningly rich API for accessing all sorts of encoding and playback functions. It's called QuickTime.

      But I'm also not foolish enough to spend $300 on something that's just going to be a piece of rubbish in a few years.

      Some people value their time and their satisfaction more than others.

      But don't try and dissuade others from choosing an alternative that is substantially better for their own needs.

      Never did. I'm simply pointing out that marketing Ogg on the premise that it's free is pointless, because programs like iTunes, which support superior codecs than Ogg, are also free. It's not a winning strategy, you see, to claim to be good and free when your competitor can claim to be better and free.

      Everyone else can have their end-use,r prepackaged middling quality products. You are more than welcome to buy into that.

      Love the smug sense of superiority you ooze. Keep that up; it really works for you.

      --

      I write in my journal
    18. Re:what is Ogg Vorbis? by eno2001 · · Score: 1
      Some people value their time and their satisfaction more than others.

      Some of us also have less money to work with than others.
      Love the smug sense of superiority you ooze. Keep that up; it really works for you.

      Seems to work for you too Mr. T. ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  3. Time to upgrade by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time to look into getting 4Mbps internet and upgrade the 120G hard disk to make room for the War and Peace mp3.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Time to upgrade by Telex4 · · Score: 1

      Time to look into getting 4Mbps internet and upgrade the 120G hard disk to make room for the War and Peace mp3.

      Pff, real men download James Joyce's Ulysses.

    2. Re:Time to upgrade by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      fwiw, I recently put together a collection of readings of Lessig's new book, and I wanted to pick a standard audio file quality.

      I finally settled on 24kbit/s (at 11Khz, mono). And so, they should even stream over modems -- and an hour of audio comes out to only about 10 MB...

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    3. Re:Time to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and an hour of audio comes out to only about 10 MB

      I think you just made his point. Have you ever read war and peace?

    4. Re:Time to upgrade by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't know how to convert James Joyce's Ulysses to normal units. Can you be more clear and say it in libraries of congress units, for God's sake ?

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    5. Re:Time to upgrade by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      "I think you just made his point. Have you ever read war and peace?"

      I'm not trying to dispute any point, just give some numbers to it. The 10MB file for an hour of audio (read by perhaps a somewhat slower reader) was for about 25 pages.

      According to Amazon, "War and Peace" is about 1400 pages, and so that roughly maps to 56 hours, or 560 MB total.

      You can certainly stream 560 MB of audio within 56 hours, and so the only issue reagards downloading a local copy, and then it's just a question of how fast you can download 560 MB (and how fast the source server can provide it).

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    6. Re:Time to upgrade by cubic6 · · Score: 1
      say it in libraries of congress units

      Given the weight and size of the softcover version of Ulysses, I'd guess about 5.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    7. Re:Time to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ulysses in normal units...

      about 3 football fields, half a great pyramid at Giza and 10 VW bugs.

    8. Re:Time to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, just listen to it streaming...

    9. Re:Time to upgrade by clifyt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ya know, when I signed up for Audible.com, one of the first things I bought was War and Piece. It comes in 8 files -- the largest of which is 123 Megs...so the simple calculation is that it should take around 1 Gig at the highest quality of recording. It also comes in:

      Fair (1 Hour of audio = 2MB): 20MB
      Medium / Good (1 Hour = 4 MB): 33MB
      Medium / Better (1 Hour = 7 MB): 61MB
      and as mentioned
      Excellent (1 Hour = 14MB): 123MB

      The Medium Better is good enough for most speech oriented listenings of this which would weigh in at half (for the math impared) a gig.

      Heck, you could listen to War and Peace on a solid state MP3 player and not have a problem at this resolution. 120Gig??? You are outta your gord. My several year old 5Gig iPod carries this easily (and its just as confusing remembering the characters in audio as it is in print -- then again, I'm not on the motorcycle shooting around at 90MPH weaving in around cars with the print version either).

      Don't ya hate it when folks ruin 'funny' rated threads with serious info :-P

  4. How about p.d. songs? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want to see them get public domain songs up there too... if the RIAA hasn't filed a motion against that -- are there even public domain songs anymore?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:How about p.d. songs? by elleomea · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may want to take a look at iRate. Not all are necessarily public domain, but all are freely distributed by their authors.

    2. Re:How about p.d. songs? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

      ...are there even public domain songs anymore?

      I think a safe bet would be anything from WWI or earlier is public domain.

      I bet that song "Hello my baby, hello my honey, hello my ragtime gal," is public domain. Just about any early ragtime piece would be, I think, like the Scott Joplin stuff. The song "The Entertainer," for instance, is copyright 1902, and stuff that old is certainly public domain, despite Disney's best efforts.

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    3. Re:How about p.d. songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two ways for something to become public domain. One is for its copyright to expire; the other is for the copyright holder to explicitly put it into the public domain. Something is copyrighted as soon as it is put in a fixed form.

      Recording technology has barely been around long enough for copyright to expire on early recordings; fortunately for recording companies, each time it gets transferred into a new form (wax cylinder to vinyl disc with grooves to 8-track to cassette to CD) the copyright effectively renews itself because it's in a new physical form. So there are no recordings, aside from hundred-year-old wax cylinders, for which the copyright has expired yet.

      If you're talking about *printed* music (and since this is Slashdot, and we're talking about digital music files, I'd wager you're not) -- all of the "old masters" are out of copyright. You can buy books with the scores of the Beethoven symphonies for about the cost of printing and distribution. New editions get copyrighted all over again, so you have to use hundred-year-old editions, but that's not usually that much of a chore so long as all the notes are right. So all the Victorian music-hall ballads you like gathering around the piano and singing with your friends are also out of copyright -- but individual recorded performances are *not*.

      So the only recorded music that's in the public domain is that which the copyright holder has put into the public domain. There are some recordings that that's true for, but not very many. Of course, there's no reason that a musician or group of musicians couldn't record a Victorian music-hall ballad and put it in the public domain; there's just little point in it if you're not fanatically opposed to copyright. And most musicians, given the choice between eating and being fanatically opposed to copyright, choose the former.

    4. Re:How about p.d. songs? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      See the Mutopia project (Canadian server, American mirror from IBiblio). They provide public domain and BSD-style licensed musical scores in GNU LilyPond format, and have PDFs and MIDIs of the score rendered for download. Many classical music pieces are available there, and the PDFs make for nice printouts.

      It's not quite a song, as in a recording (any recordings from before the PD date probably haven't survived), but it's still public domain music.

  5. finally someone "gets it" by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Five years or 100,000 paid downloads whichever comes first... yes I can support that model. Why the heck can't the RIAA or MPAA get with it??? nah, they've got to keep milking the cash cow for as long as they possible can... why else is stuff like Pink Floyd or Led Zepp's back catalogue so expensive still some thirty years after first release???

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:finally someone "gets it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because idiots keep paying for it.

      The huge problems that face the world today are ignorance, and cluelessness, as well as a large quantity of people not standing up for anything.

      If the customers all of a sudden stopped buying their Floyd until the prices went down, you can bet your bottom dollar the price would drop quick smart.

    2. Re:finally someone "gets it" by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2, Funny

      why else is stuff like Pink Floyd or Led Zepp's back catalogue so expensive still some thirty years after first release???

      This is so in order for the mentioned artists not starving to death.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    3. Re:finally someone "gets it" by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Or the RIAA would just blame the drop in sales on filesharers and proceed to sue everyone and their dog.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  6. Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I fail to see how this is analogous to the Gutenburg Project. Firstly, the Gutenburg Project has free books, with a wealth of literature there for all.

    This project, is not free, thought it is cheap, but does it have the depth of literature behind it? Audiobooks are relatively new compared to normal books, is there such a great selection and wealth of information/literature out there to warrant a community project such as this?

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by xanderwilson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The idea is to slowly and continually fund, stock, and build a free audio library. Recordings of classic texts, which is the heart of Telltale Weekly, will be offered freely after five years or a given number of sales. When free, these audiobooks can be freely distributed whereever and however, including at Project Gutenberg, if they are interested.

      Selling the work cheaply until then pays for current and future bandwidth, hosting, and recording costs--and attracts more talent to the project.

      Alex.

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by mellerbeck · · Score: 1

      Hey I'm working on a project that also addresses this spokenberg.net
      Its starting slowly but been fun so far. Tell me what you think

    3. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good.

      I listen to audiobooks almost daily at work and I have been considering making my own since there are none abvailable for free on the internet. I've been trying to convince an actor friend that it would be good pratice as well as good way to get his name out there for other voicework projects. I think soliciting prospective voice actors might get you some readers.

      I think the free idea sounds better to me. I can understand wanting to charge for the delivery costs, but Audible only costs $10 per audiobook(subscription) and it's voice talent is already compensated. I would much rather have more books that weren't recorded by professionals than fewer books recorded by compensated actors.

      Perhaps charging $10 for a yearly subscription would be better solution until such a time as advertisers, and donations could pay for bandwidth(Hello, BitTorrent)costs.

      Anyway, both these ideas are great. Keep up the good work.

  7. Lessig's "Free Culture" by turnstyle · · Score: 1

    Along these lines, I assembled a streaming version of Lessig's new book "Free Culture", with contributed readings by assorted folks...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  8. Reg Free Link by BoldAC · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Reg Free Link by MrNonchalant · · Score: 1

      The way I circumvented it was to do an I'm feeling lucky on the URL at Google.

    2. Re:Reg Free Link by BoldAC · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  9. Duh, Have you listened to new music? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because that music is still better than 99.9999% of the music released in the thirty years prior. Thats sort of like asking why a 67 caddy is more expensive used today then when it was first sold.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Duh, Have you listened to new music? by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      "Thats sort of like asking why a 67 caddy is more expensive used today then when it was first sold."

      the supply of '67 Cadillacs is limited and numbers are falling... Pink Floyd music is limited to how many times they can keep cranking the presses to knock out perfect copies in fresh formats everytime there's a new playing medium available. ie it's currently out on 30th anniversary special edition in 5.1 surround sound with DVD extras... The music hasn't changed... but there are limits to how many times they can expect a person to keep purchasing the stuff. I bought it when it first came out in vinyl and then again on mobile Fidelity 1/2 speed mastered vinyl, and then on CD, and then on the remastered 21st anniversary CD... but I've hit my limit... I've replaced my vinyl collection... but I'm not going to replace my CD collection... which is why I've ripped it all to .ogg format to save wear and tear on the CDs... yes they do wear out, and I've got some original ones from the 80's that refuse to play anymore cos of the aluminium coating having degraded

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:Duh, Have you listened to new music? by clifyt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its also due to the fact that its been filtered by the years.

      When folks talk about how great anything was X years ago, they conviently forget about all the shit that didn't make it. Its like houses, a good friend of mine always claims they don't make them like they use to and point of the great old houses available today -- duh...the bad shit fell down, burned down or was torn down.

      If you listen to any popular oldies station, they recycle the same play list over and over and over. Out of 1982, I can count maybe 3 or 4 great songs. The rest were average. Out of 1967, I can do the same. Out of 2004 -- I actually feel like there is far more diversity to choose from, but honestly, there is probably just as few GREAT songs on the radio.

      So, a band's music survives 30 years...thats almost like claiming that copyright works perfectly. In the beginning they make crap and survive like anyone else. As they progress, the field weeds out. Its only in their old age when their output is nothing and bandmembers had dies off that this stuff gets any recognition.

      Personally, I think copyright should be limited to a smaller time frame than is currently given, but how much smaller? Few can agree on that part :-)

      Again, its only '99.9999%' better because the law of averages over the years...

  10. Neato... by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I had the free time available, I would so love to "make" an audiobook reading an older public domain work or something... too bad I don't have anything in the way of good enough sound equipment for it.

    That would be a good way of making older or more obscure works of literature available to the blind or anyone who wants to enjoy them on the go, with volunteer readers narrating the texts. Of course they'd need to be screened for quality, but I think something like that would be feasible. The fees could pretty much be cheap enough to just cover the costs of bandwidth and hosting.

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:Neato... by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a thing or two about sound. I don't think that equipment is the big barrier - while audiophiles and sound engineers love to spend tens of thousands of dollars, the truth is that if you get a decent mic (about $100) for your PC, that will be plenty for spoken voice. Sure, it may not have perfect frequency reproduction and good noise rejection, but we're not recording a live band - just one person with no stray noise. You should also have a nice quiet room.

      Where the cost comes into it is in the editing. Most people probably have acceptable voices - if you just teach yourself to speak at a good rate without stuttering. However, NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY, can read a page of text without any errors. Those nice audiobooks that you buy probably had 5 takes for every paragraph. If somebody misreads a sentence they probably just pause and reread it. Then the editor has to listen to the whole thing and splice out the errors. That takes TIME! Plus they probaby do multiple recordings of passages as necessary to get the right dramatic effect.

      Then of course somebody has to "proofread" the final work for accuracy.

      It is just like filiming movies - a nice digital camera is probably all you need to make a feature film, in theory (that and the sound equipment). However, the reality is that you need to film each scene from 14 angles 24 times and pick the very best clips for the show. That is what makes filming expensive.

      I don't think that you'll ever see a completely free Gutenberg-like project for audiobooks - at least not until voice synthesizers sound just like people. Gutenberg works because of OCR and the ease of distributed proofreading.

      Maybe the first step would be a distributed editing approach for audiobooks. If you could get somebody to do the initial reading, the editing could potentially be distributed. Granted, forget a simple web-browser interface - we'll need client-server at the least (potentially a Java applet might work), and lots of bandwidth. Still something worth thinking about though...

    2. Re:Neato... by xanderwilson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Where the cost comes into it is in the editing.

      Ah, somebody understands....

      Still something worth thinking about though...

      At some point later this year I'd like to start a steering/planning discussion (forum or list, likely) about the direction Telltale will take to become more community-led. I'm fairly certain that by the end of the year, this project will be limited by what I'm doing with it, rather than encouraged by my work. If this is something that interests you, I hope you'll send me a note or join the newsletter.

      Alex.

  11. TTS is no substitute for audiobooks. by Monx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Text-to-speech technology is no substitute for an audio book. Audiobooks are read by humans. Humans use slightly different voices for different characters, and infuse their voices with emotion. Some audiobooks are dramatized, with different readers for each character.

    Would you take the script of a play or a movie, run it through tts and then say it was even a passable substitute for the original?

    1. Re:TTS is no substitute for audiobooks. by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm - maybe a nice compromise might be a distributed tagging approach.

      You could use a distributed proofreaders approach to tag text for different voices. Then you could do voice synthesis using different voices for different parts.

      I agree that this is in no way a real substitute for audiobooks. However, this has the potential of being able to be done freely, or close to it.

      Real audiobooks will be difficult to ever make free, since they require huge contributions by a few individual actors, plus a load of editing which is difficult to distribute (and the skills for which are not as widespread as the simple ability to proofread).

    2. Re:TTS is no substitute for audiobooks. by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Text-to-speech has its uses... Political Speeches for example. I just LOVE imagining our leaders are actually humanoid robotic enslavers and that we're living in a world where corporations reign supreme and the smelly masses have no rights and a rapidly declining standard of living. I find our android leaders have much more personality and human decency than our real ones.

      I once ran Orwell's 1984 through text-to-speech; the flat coldness of the artificial voice made it pretty damn bleak. COOL! Just what I was going for! Next up, William Gibson's Idoru. I need to get a list of cyberpunk futuristic thrillers to sterilize with TTS.

      Look at it this way: I'm just ahead of the curve -- give it twenty years, and hopefully all our new wives will sound like that.. heh heh.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    3. Re:TTS is no substitute for audiobooks. by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

      Would you take the script of a play or a movie, run it through tts and then say it was even a passable substitute for the original?

      If it was "Matrix Revolutions", yeah, no doubt it would improve on the quality of the original.

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    4. Re:TTS is no substitute for audiobooks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could send it into /dev/null and read it back. That would improve the quality even more.

    5. Re:TTS is no substitute for audiobooks. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Would you take the script of a play or a movie, run it through tts and then say it was even a passable substitute for the original?

      There's a huge difference between a play/movie script and book. A script is lines that are meant to be performed by different people and acted out. There is no description of what's actually happenening because it is to be done visually in the background.

      With a book, everything is in the text. I read a few books a week, and I've tried audiobooks a couple of times. I just find it impossible to visualize what's going one when someone else is doing the reading. I get a lot more out of the book if I read it myself. OTOH, I'd much rather see a movie than read the screenplay.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

  12. Not that cheap by twoshortplanks · · Score: 3, Informative
    I love the idea. This could be really big. However, it's not actually that cheap. Auduble offer two books a month for 40usd. Picking two books off the front page (Cold mountain, 14h 21m, Dude Where's My Country, 6h 57m) that's 3.12 cents a minute.

    From Telltale A Modest Proposal Swift, 18m 21s) costs 75 cents. That's 4.15cents a minute.

    Of course, you don't have the DRM crap you get with audible, or the subscription stuff, and you get it in plain mp3s (or OGGs!), and you can give it to your blind neighbour for free, and eventually they'll set the file free for anyone...but for *now*, it's still not the cheapest thing on the block.

    (Someone please check my maths)

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    1. Re:Not that cheap by color+of+static · · Score: 1

      The average price per minute should drop as more lengthy works get included. I can't see them charging ten or twenty bucks for a full length work, and there has to be a minimum charge for the shorter ones.

    2. Re:Not that cheap by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this will be true. I'd love to get something like Dickens for a few bucks.

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    3. Re:Not that cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. You actually want to pay to read Dickens? I thought his books were a torture designed to destroy students' appreciation of talented writers.

    4. Re:Not that cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but since when was the value of a book measured by length? I imagine many people will find A Modest Proposal more valuable than Dude, Where's My Country?.

      (Personally I am a fan of Micheal Moore even though he is an arrogant jerk. At least he knows who to aim his arrogant jerkiness at.)

    5. Re:Not that cheap by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1

      No. I want to pay to have Dickens read to me! Keep up ;-)

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    6. Re:Not that cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass. Dickens kicks your lily ass, up and down the street.

      Faggot-assed faggot.

  13. Audio Books For Free . Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try WWW.AudioBooksForFree.com. They have been covered on /. before and they allow you to download .mp3 files (of somewhat crappy quality) for free. Or if you want audio quality then you can take out your wallet. They also have hundreds of titles available. It's the only way to survive on the graveyard shift.

  14. Karma Whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Make post masquerading as reply to troll. 2) Post reply to that as Anonymous Coward (again, as a fake troll) 3) Reply to previous fake post. 4) Get modded up to +5 each time.

  15. great idea by rnd() · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a great idea. Maybe we'd even see more technical books available as audiobooks (think the Dover maths texts, for example).

    Audiobooks have completely changed my reading habits over the past few years. I now read several books each week, during exercise, driving here and there, etc.

    The trouble would be to find talented readers (as a previous post pointed out), but if it required a minimal download fee to hire good readers (or let them quit their day job), I'd certainly support that.

    I currently pay $50/month for a membership at Talking Book World, which has a lot of titles, though their selection is fairly light on nonfiction and technical subjects.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

    1. Re:great idea by xanderwilson · · Score: 1

      What early (pre-1923) math/technical texts do you think would be most accessible in audiobook format? The math texts at the Dover site either list no dates or list dates that are after 1923 (and are not currently copyright-free). Book requests are most welcome.

      Works currently under copyright, but released under a CCL (most often a noncommercial one) would likely have to be produced and hosted competely free of charge from the start, which will be possible down the road, but probably not now, especially for longer works. Though if an author has decided to release her or his work under a CCL, then it is definitely possible that she or he would be interested in working something out with Telltale.

      Alex.

    2. Re:great idea by rnd() · · Score: 1

      I think most of the Dover stuff is in the public domain...

      I know that it would be tough for a reader to articulate all of the notation properly, but someone who knew the material well enough would, I believe, have a good shot.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  16. Gutenberg already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a better selection and it's all free (donations are righteous)

  17. Free Audiobooks? Start with the Bible... by imadork · · Score: 1
    It's the best-selling book in history and many familiar translations are already in the Public Domain. I imagine there's some commentary that's in the public domain too. There will always be people who want to pay to listen to it. And once it becomes freely available on this site, I'm sure there are lots of religious organizations that can make use of it.

    I see they have one track from the Bible up right now. I wouldn't be suprised if that was their best seller (at least, before /. linked to them!)

    1. Re:Free Audiobooks? Start with the Bible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read fiction. I just haven't read the Bible because I don't read poor fiction. I don't like self-contradicting story-lines and characters who suddenly change personality for no reason whatsoever.

  18. compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4.15 cents * 60 mins. == 249 cents ($2.49 an hour)

    Min. wage in the US is $5.15 an hour.

    Mean US Power bill per month (1998):
    $46.68 (500 KWH)
    $88.12 (1000 KWH)

    Mean US Phone bill, sans DSL, per month (1998):
    $70
    [NOTE: take this with a large amount of salt, source was trying to sell a phone service.]

  19. Already available by doublem · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Bible is already on the web for free in MP3 format.

    http://audiotreasure.com/

    In several languages:

    The World English Bible narrated by David Williams Old and New Testaments

    The King James Bible narrated by Stephen Johnston Old and New Testaments

    La Biblia Reina Valera narrated by Juan Alberto Ovalle Nuevo Testamento y Salmos

    The King James Bible narrated by ASI New Testament

    The Mandarin Bible narrated by ASI Old and New Testaments

    Cantonese NT narrated by ASI

    Scripture Selections KJV and WEB Encoded for email

    Urdu New Testament narrated by ASI

    Hindi New Testament narrated by ASI

    Tagalog New Testament narrated by ASI

    Slovak New Testament narrated by ASI

    Polish Bible narrated selections

    The Gospels and Psalms in Arabic

    Worship Songs in mp3

    Hebrew Old Testament narrated by ASI

    Punjabi New Testament

    Bengali New Testament

    Free Christian AudioBooks

    Tamil New Testament

    God's Powerful Saviour

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Already available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  20. More Free AudioBooks by wehe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a (yet small) collection of links to Free AudioBooks and eBooks.

    BTW: Linux on laptops for blind people.

  21. Nice idea, but you're probably already paying by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I listen to audiobooks only when I commute. I don't listen to them when I'm working at my computer, and I don't listen to them at home for recreation. If I was to use this service I would have to burn the books to a cd (since I don't own an MP3 player), and I would have to pay for the content and the CDs.

    That's not a good deal for me, since I'm already paying for audiobooks through my taxes. My county library system has a very large collection of audiobooks (cassette and CD). If my local branch lacks one I want I just request it through the web interface and in a few days I can pick it up right down the street. In the US the situation is probably similar for most people.

    This assumes that Telltale Weekly will expand beyond its current catalog of 23 titles of course...

    1. Re:Nice idea, but you're probably already paying by aarondsouza · · Score: 1

      The comment is justified, and well taken, except that there are a fair number of people who do listen to audiobooks for recreation. I realized this recently when I had to have some fairly involved surgery on my right eye, which left me bored stiff while I recovered. My fiancee was wonderful enough to bring me a stack of books on tape, and it seriously got me through the rough 2 weeks when I could do little else. Browsing through some of the support groups for eye conditions, you'll probably find a pretty large audience which don't just listen to these just to kill time on the clogged freeway, but because it's sometimes the only way they can experience reading anymore.

      --
      "In mathematics, it's not enough to read the words -- you have to hear the music"
  22. $0.75 marked up three times by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apparently, MPEG-1 audio layer 3 decoding costs $15,000 for the first 20,000 units shipped in each fiscal year and 0.75 USD for each additional unit. That's part of cost of goods sold; the cost to the end user would also have to include the administrative cost of dealing with Thomson, the distributor's mark-up, and the dealer's mark-up. Mark-up increases with price in part because the cost of insuring the merchandise against damage or theft increases with price. And then multiply that by the number of patented formats included in the firmware, noticing that MPEG-4 AAC may in fact cost much more than MP3.

    1. Re:$0.75 marked up three times by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      That's part of cost of goods sold; the cost to the end user would also have to include the administrative cost of dealing with Thomson, the distributor's mark-up, and the dealer's mark-up.

      I'm not sure I follow this. Are you saying that it costs Apple 75c/unit, then the distributor marks it up 100% and the retailer an additional 100%? So, it costs Apple $75 to make an iPod? ($75 for cost of goods + 100% markup by the distributor to $150, then 100% markup by the retailer taking it to $300.) As for administrative costs associated with Thompson, I really don't think that's a lot. A bean counter at Apple says, "We sold a million of these, send a check to Thompson for $750,000". I can't see that sentence costing a lot of money.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    2. Re:$0.75 marked up three times by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

      BUT... it might not be a million units sold. You may sell only 80,000 (late comer to the market maybe, or not enough buzz yet). So, you're paying something like $20,000 in licensing. Granted, still not a huge amount of money, but it's a bigger perentage. And as someone else pointed out, that's just the cost for MP3 - AAC might be more, and to make players to support other formats will likely add more into the licensing costs too. So why *not* support Ogg in a player as well?

      Someone else said 'it's cheaper' isn't enough. Well, it's cheaper, to my ears sounds a bit better for most audio, and takes up less space (more room in my player for audio).

      It doesn't have the cachet of the name 'MP3', and frankly came a bit late to get caught up in the hype, but it is a good format. Better, smaller and cheaper *should* be hard to beat, but apparently it's not. :)

    3. Re:$0.75 marked up three times by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Apparently, MPEG-1 audio layer 3 decoding costs $15,000 for the first 20,000 units shipped in each fiscal year and 0.75 USD for each additional unit.

      And yet iTunes is free.

      How does that work, exactly?

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:$0.75 marked up three times by glitchvern · · Score: 1
      Apparently, MPEG-1 audio layer 3 decoding costs $15,000 for the first 20,000 units shipped in each fiscal year and 0.75 USD for each additional unit.

      And yet iTunes is free.

      How does that work, exactly?

      It was free originally for free players. It might still be I'm not sure, but the license supposedly did change. here is the slashdot story from when people noticed it changed, and here is a debian thread afterwards saying it has not really changed. I do not think Fraunhofer (the patent holders) has ever gone after anyone for distributing a free player. Anyway there are a few games that use ogg vorbis instead of mp3 for their sounds because game companies do have to pay the fee. The mp3 patents supposedly cover many ways of compressing sounds, but xiph (ogg vorbis's makers) actually went to the trouble of hiring patent lawyers when they designed vorbis, and their lawyers believe they do not infringe.

      And no, none this will ever actually affect you.
    5. Re:$0.75 marked up three times by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have the cachet of the name 'MP3'

      Maybe not, but that IS the most important part. MP3 was first, it's the de facto standard for digital music, regardless of what the geeks think of it. People who spend time away from their computers, and slashdot, don't care about the other things because they don't know about them.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
  23. Life PLUS? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If copyright terms approximating the life of the author are necessary to prevent the author from starving to death, then what about the works of recording artists who have already passed away, often along with the songwriter? Why can't Elvis's recordings become free? What is the reasoning behind life plus 70 except as welfare for people who happen to be born heirs to an author?

  24. Project Gutenberg Audiobooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can they say that they're providing the audio equivalent to Project Gutenberg when PG has already branched into the audiobooks arena?

  25. Natural Voices by garyok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how hard it'd be to write a litte app that'd take books a sentence at a time and stick them through AT&T's Natural Voices demo. Mash up all the MP3s at the end and, hey presto, free audiobooks.

    As long as the author isn't inconsiderate enough to write sentence longer than 30 words...

    But, before this egregarious misapplication of provisionally available proprietary technology commences, does anyone know what good, free (as in speech and beer) text-to-voice tools are available?

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    1. Re:Natural Voices by iantri · · Score: 1
      Well, festival works under Linux and ReadPlease does exactly what you want under Windows, but the sound of a computer talking at you for hours on end is NOT pleasant..

      I don't know how blind computer users can stand it..

    2. Re:Natural Voices by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2, Informative

      Festival is at least tolerably good; it's under an X11-style license. It's admittedly not as nice as AT&T's thing though.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    3. Re:Natural Voices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Create your own voice with FestVox. There are some really good free limited domain voices out there.

    4. Re:Natural Voices by mcb123 · · Score: 1

      I agree with the poster - I tried listening to the Tale of Two Cities through Festival - it's pretty hard to listen to for more than 10 minutes. Ideally I would read it to myself, but then.... :-)

  26. for the author in search of a publisher by technoCon · · Score: 1

    yaknow, i'm thinking i could:
    - take some of my best short stories,
    - get my wife who worked in radio to record them,
    - post the MP3s,
    - encourage editors to listen on the subway ride.

    Maybe that way i could get a book deal.

  27. audio vs text by wjzhu · · Score: 1

    Although multimedia has enhanced the way we experience various contents, words by themselves (at least in good writing) are really the highest level of abstraction of human thought, the result of intense focus and mental effort. It allows speed reading, skimming, or slow reflection. These are the things that I can only do with text and not with other multimedia. So whether people come up with audio/video or whatever new multimedia libraries, the e-text libraries like Guttenburg would always have a special and irreplaceable place.

    1. Re:audio vs text by EdipisReks · · Score: 1

      personally, i prefer paper texts to all of them. at least paper doesn't crash. mostly.

  28. Re:Nothing new under the sun.. Almost by Technician · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Classic TV advertising may even have to give way to pure product-placement campaigns.

    What I found interesting is this type of advertising is far from new. I found some old radio programs. The Fibber McGee and Molly episodes were a real eye opener. The show did not break for a word from the sponsor. The pitch man added the product endorsement as part of the show. It seemed to fit just like the Monty Python SPAM SPAM SPAM episode that is so famous except the old radio show was promoting a floor wax. Killing the promotion would leave out an entertaining part of the show. Other than the industry hang-up with DRM and the "perfect copy", the advertising with product placement has come full circle back to the 1940's.

    Too bad I have to go to the '40's and '50's to get DRM free MP3's of good radio shows. Most everything newer is locked up in vaults and copyright never to be heard again. I would like to collect the Radio Mystery series from the '70's, but CBS refuses to release it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  29. Re:good enough sound by Technician · · Score: 2

    too bad I don't have anything in the way of good enough sound equipment for it.


    File size is important. Super high fidelity CD quality is not required or even wanted. It makes the files too big.

    Voice is defined by the telephone company as 300 HZ to 3KHZ, not 20 HZ to 20 KHZ usualy mentioned for high fideliety music.

    A computer with a sound card and a headset with MONO boom mike provide excelent results. If you are running Windows, then the free utility CDEX used for ripping CD's to MP3 has a record function that works great. Set your bit-rate and sound levels and start reading. 8 bit mono at 11Kbits/sec is quite usable for speech and makes small files. Give it a shot. Use a room free of distracting background noises.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  30. Free non-book, spoken word by LetterJ · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I currently listen to quite a few audiobooks, but supplement it with audio of classic radio, Supreme Court arguments, etc.

    Most of the oral arguments to the most important Supreme Court cases are available as MP3's from Oyez.com.

    Thousands of old radio programs, including mysteries, comedies, political/historical audio, etc. are available for a small flat monthly fee ($7.50/month) at RUSC.com.

    I've found it really interesting to be able to listen to *primary* sources for a lot of the cultural history of the United States. Think you understand Brown v. the Board of Education? Listen to the arguments and you'll see how much is missing from your high school telling of the story. It tends to be a bit more meat for listening when compared to the candy that many modern audiobooks provide.

  31. Why Vorbis is important. by pavon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No one in this thread has really managed to explain why ogg vorbis is necisarry yet. As people have pointed out mp3 (and aac, wma, mp3pro etc) is patented and therefore in order to write an mp3 player or encoder you must pay licencing fees, which are normally charged for each player/encoder that you distribute.

    With open source software however, it is impossible to keep track of how many copies have been distributed because anyone is free to modify or redistribute the software. This pretty much makes it illegal to write an open source mp3 player/encoder, since it is impossible to meet the terms of the patent license.

    There is an exception for educational and research purposes. However, if a project leader declares in his license that software is for educational purposes only, then he has covered his ass, but the legality problem has now shifted to his users - all the people that use the software for comercial or personal use are now breaking the law. Besides, the reason most of us release our software as open source isn't so people can learn from it, but so it will be usefull to people. We don't want to create a wonderfull collection of software which can only be marvelled at and not put to use. The GPL recognises this and actually prohibits people from further restricting who can use derived works (ie for non-comercial use, non-nuclear use etc).

    So the first point is that if we want to follow the law, we don't have a choice but to drop mp3 and make something better. And it really is better to follow the law. One might say "But they have never sued open source developers, you are making a big deal out of nothing". To which I reply "I will trust them not to sue me when I it on paper". You are putting yourself in a bad situation to trust people to play nice. Especially when these people (proprietary software companies and music cartels) are becoming increasingly hostile to open source.

    The second point is that it is better for the end user as well. The documents you create and lawfully recieve from others are your own. It is wrong for someone to restrict your access to your files, but this sort of lock-in is exacly what proprietary and patent encumbered file format create. In my opinion, proprietary file formats are a much larger problem than proprietary software.

  32. Plays and books on the BBC by davekebab · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are plenty of streaming books and plays on the BBC radio site.
    The current Book at Bedtime (GMT and not streaming live) is Jane Eyre and there are Plays, Short Stories and Soaps too. Contemporary and classic.

    All content is free -- paid for by the British taxpayer :)

    -DK-

    1. Re:Plays and books on the BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All content is free -- paid for by the British taxpayer :)

      No, the British license payer. By virtue of not owning a TV, I've never given the BBC a penny.

  33. It's a loss leader by tepples · · Score: 1

    The iTunes software is not entirely free but is available at no charge to end users on the Windows platform. I'll conjecture a business model that would let Apple afford $2.50 per MP3 encoder:

    • Revenue from sales of Macintosh computers subsidizes development of the QuickTime media architecture for Mac OS X.
    • Revenue from QuickTime Pro for Windows ($30/seat) and from Mac OS X Server subsidizes a port of parts of the Carbon framework, which underlies QuickTime Player and iTunes for the Microsoft Windows platform.
    • Revenue from iPod players subsidizes the codec licenses in the iTunes software. Apple has disclosed that the iTunes software and the iTunes Music Store are loss-leaders to push iPod players.
    • It's entirely possible that Apple negotiated a cheaper volume license with Thomson.
    1. Re:It's a loss leader by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      The iTunes software is not entirely free but is available at no charge to end users on the Windows platform.

      No, it's entirely free. Anybody can download it at no charge. There are versions available for Mac or Windows, and neither one of them has a price tag.

      [idle speculation]

      Whatever. Any one of those may be true, or none of them. The point remains: the fact that Ogg does not have a license fee attached matters not one damn bit to end users.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:It's a loss leader by tepples · · Score: 1

      No, it's entirely free.

      "Available at no charge" != "free". In 1850, if a slaveowner wanted to give one of his slaves as a gift to his son at no charge, would the slave have automatically become a free man?

      Anybody can download it at no charge. There are versions available for Mac or Windows

      True, anybody can download the iTunes software, but what's the point of downloading a program available only for Mac OS or Microsoft Windows OS if you don't have a Macintosh computer or a Windows license?

      the fact that Ogg does not have a license fee attached matters not one damn bit to end users.

      Granted, but what about sound quality for a given bitrate? Does AAC beat Ogg Vorbis at 128 kbps?

    3. Re:It's a loss leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1850, if a slaveowner wanted to give one of his slaves as a gift to his son at no charge, would the slave have automatically become a free man?

      In 2004, if tepples resorts to a ridiculous hyperbolic argument, would he them be considered a retard?

      This is freaking software to play music. This isn't life or death.

    4. Re:It's a loss leader by glitchvern · · Score: 1
      Whatever. Any one of those may be true, or none of them. The point remains: the fact that Ogg does not have a license fee attached matters not one damn bit to end users.

      Well, if you follow the link tepples gave and click around for awhile you find out Fraunhofer supposedly actully charges for encoders and for distributing or broadcasting mp3 files. Its the sort of thing you would worry about if you were a large organization that created mp3 software or distributed mp3 files in any way, but as an individual, well I think you summed it up nicely with whatever.

      Don't get me wrong. I'm glad Xiph's out there, doing what they're doing, but unless Fraunhofer starts actually going after individual people ogg pretty much only affects companies or people who make money doing things with sound, which of course the subject of the article actually does. I guess that's why they're kicking some money back at Xiph. Ogg makes what these people are doing legal.
    5. Re:It's a loss leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, but what about sound quality for a given bitrate? Does AAC beat Ogg Vorbis at 128 kbps?

      Actually, yes, it does. I've tried both.

    6. Re:It's a loss leader by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      In 1850, if a slaveowner wanted to give one of his slaves as a gift to his son at no charge, would the slave have automatically become a free man?

      Hey, neat. That was really cool, the way you deliberately chose to misunderstand the meaning of a word in a given context to try to advance your little agenda. That's really awesome. I've never seen anything like that before. You're so cool. When I grow up I wanna be just like you.

      True, anybody can download the iTunes software, but what's the point of downloading a program available only for Mac OS or Microsoft Windows OS if you don't have a Macintosh computer or a Windows license?

      The point is that you don't have to pay for it. It's free.

      Does AAC beat Ogg Vorbis at 128 kbps?

      Handily.

      --

      I write in my journal
  34. Semi-related question by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    I've been toying with the idea of doing some audiobook reading: for the people in here that do it for a living (for example) or that know somebody who does: how did you start? how does it work?

    I have also been thinking about doing it for free (after all, I'm sure there must be charities somewhere that need books/magazines/newspapers readers for people that can't read for a reason or another) but google was not very helpful, does anybody have any ideas about where to look?

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:Semi-related question by xanderwilson · · Score: 2
      Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic, which is one of the groups Telltale Weekly supports, can always use volunteers. Call 1-800-803-7201 to find a studio near you. There are also usually services for the print-disabled that are local. Look in your yellow pages.

      I'll be putting up some recording tips (& recommended equipment) shortly for producers/performers who want to be involved at Telltale. Up to this point, participants in the project have had their own home studios (from a simple four-track and microphone to big, bad mixing boards and dedicated rooms).

      Alex.

    2. Re:Semi-related question by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      thanks for the reply, I am in Canada so it's unlikely they'd have recording studios here: the Canadian association for the blind does have studios but only in Eastern Canada it seems...

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
  35. I'm there by scottennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wrote a short story for my son and recorded it at a local studio.

    After hearing about TellTale Weekly on NPR I decided to see if they'd post my story.

    They did.

    They set the price to cover bandwidth costs and still give me some pocket change. It's a 20 page story which reads in just under 30 minutes. The price was set at $1.50.

    I think that the biggest detractor for this medium is that most people don't realize how long it takes to read things out loud.

    I read books on tape for the blind through Minnesota State Services for the blind. Even a book which is written with the intent to be read aloud takes more time than just reading through it to yourself.

    Anyway, just thought I'd throw in a shameless plug for my story, with hopefully some insights into the whole process.

    It's called Ah Sunflower

  36. Radio Gutenberg by Beolach · · Score: 1

    Project Gutenberg already has a section devoted to audio ebooks, but I have to say I'm all for this Telltale Weekly. All of the PG Audio Books I've listened too have been text-to-speech computer generated audio, and have been rather difficult to understand. As long as Telltale Weekly actually has human readers recording, they will be better than what PG currently has. I do hope that Telltale Weekly submits their audio ebooks to be included in PG.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.