Slashdot Mirror


Bad News for Earth's Magnetic Field

jabex writes "Scientific American's website has an article about the overdue magnetic field flip. According to research published in the journal Nature, it could take anywhere from 2000-10000 years to complete. That's a long time without a protective magnetic field."

3 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Dipole to quadrupole to reversal... by lcde · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't find the article on google right now, but the last time i read about this in between the reversal of earths magnetic pole it turns into a quadrupole or higher order for a couple of hundreds of years then it finishes.

    Still we won't lose our magnetic field unless our core solidifies, but a field reversal or a higher order magnetic field will allow different polorization of solar winds and other EM noise that would be different that what we have now. We also might not be as well protected against the solar flares during the sun's cycle.

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  2. Re:Can GPS substitute? by bluGill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Learn to navigate without a compass. I live in an area with many iron deposits, we learned long ago that a compass is not a reliable tool for navigation. We learn other tricks. (Starts at night, guesstimate the time and use the sun during the day). Combine that with knowing about what the land should look like and you can get close enough. Not as easy or are reliable a a compass in other areas, but it works.

  3. punctuated equilibrium by orn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The fossil record shows that the Earth goes through periods of time where there is an incredible amount of speciazation - new critters pop into being very quickly. I've read other stuff that suggests that this is simply due to the die-offs: since there's a niche available, something moves to fill that niche.

    Could this be a contributing factor or even a causative agent? The normally low error rate in genetic reproduction takes a big spike due to more particles getting through the Van Allen belts?

    --
    1. 2.