Slashdot Mirror


AmEx vs. rec.humor.funny

An anonymous reader writes "I worried that Brad Templeton's humorous reply in rec.humour.funny to the MasterCard threat might put an end to my daily read. I never heard the outcome, but since the column continues and he is using the same response to a suit from American Express, it must have been OK. This guy has more b*lls than I."

13 of 423 comments (clear)

  1. slashdotted by Karamchand · · Score: 5, Informative
  2. Both sites already slow, here they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mastercard threatens rec.humor.funny over satire
    bt@templetons.com (Brad Templeton)
    http://www.templetons.com/brad

    (topical, chuckle, true)

    Two years ago, rec.humor.funny published a sick satire of the Mastercard "Priceless" ads (There are some things money can't buy, for everything else there's Mastercard) based around the Columbine tragedy. I won't repeat it here, since it was pretty sick and offensive, though you can find it on the web site at:

    http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/99/Apr/columbi ne .html

    Today we received a "cease and desist" letter from Mastercard's lawyers demanding that the parody be removed from our web site, falsely claiming it violates their trademarks and copyrights, in spite of the well established rules protecting satire and parody from such attacks.

    The letter can be found at

    http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/price.html

    Here, however, is my response...

    Web site hosting for anybody: $10/month and up

    Threatening letters to people who satirize you, hoping
    they won't know the law: $500

    Reputation as giant corporation required to intimidate
    small publishers: $billions

    Supreme court decisions protecting parody and
    satire from accusations of copyright and
    trademark infringement... Priceless

    There are some rights money can't buy. For everything else, there's Mastercard's lawyers.

    ============

    April 13, 2004
    American Express threatens me over joke on web site

    On my rec.humor.funny web site, I maintain the newsgroup archives, including this 13 year old joke entitled American Expressway.

    Today I got one of those bullying "cease and desist" letters from American Express's law firm, ordering me to take down the joke for trademark infringement. Here's the text of the cease and desist

    Do these guys know who they are trying to bully? I guess not, here's my response to them:

    You can "Screw More" with an American Express Lawyer

    Do you know me?

    I built a famous company with a famous name, and then satirists made fun of me by taking advantage of the constitutional protections afforded parody when it comes to trademark law?

    That's why I retained Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd, the "American Express Lawyers." Should you ever feel your reputation lost or stolen by free speech and satire, just one call gets LVM to write a threatening cease and desist letter -- usually on the same day -- citing all sorts of important sounding laws but ignoring the realities of parody. Most innocent web sites will cave in, not knowing their rights. LVM will pretend it has never read cases like L.L. Bean, Inc. v. High Society and dozens of others. There's no preset limit on the number of people you can threaten, so you can bully as much as you wish.

    After all, Being Giant and Intimidating has its Privileges.

    American Express Lawyers: Don't leave your home page without them.

    For more examples of such games, check out our joint project with the Berkman center to document them: Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. And yes, Mastercard pulled the same stunt several years ago.
    Posted by Brad at April 13, 2004 03:17 PM | TrackBack

    1. Re:Both sites already slow, here they are by slackerboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      And the text of the actual joke that AmEx is complaining about is google cached here.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    2. Re:Both sites already slow, here they are by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, that's just what expensive corporate lawyers would like you to believe.

      It is true that a trademark can be lost if it is not vigorously protected from infringement. However, since satire isn't an infringement, there is nothing to protect it from when satire happens.

      The various bullying C&D letters sent out are nothing more or less than willful bullying.

      If there is any doubt about the nature of a trademark's use, the various lawyers could just as easily send out a letter noting the existance of the parody, and reminding the author or publisher of the parody that while parody is perfectly legal, they should take steps to assure that they do not cross the line by going into (for example) the banking and credit business using that parody. There is no need to threaten gloom and doom or willfully ignore important portions of trademark law other than to bully the recipiant of the letter.

    3. Re:Both sites already slow, here they are by RazzleFrog · · Score: 5, Informative

      First - That's a load of bullshit. There is no such thing as protecting your trademark. As long as you continue to use it in the course of business it is protected. It is an urban legend, an old wives tales, general bullshit. There has never been a case where a company failed to protect its trademark and lost.

      Second - Trademark infringement can only come when another company uses your trademark in business. Just using the name of a company in a joke is not trademark infringement any more than me typing MasterCard right here is not infringement.

      Third - Contrary to the moron AC below Kleenex still holds its trademark. You will never see Scotties Kleenex - they are called Scotties Tissues. People can refer to common items (like band aids, kleenex, vasoline, etc) but when a company sells a similar product they can not use that name. Just go to a grocery store and that is plain to see.

      Fourth - This has nothing to do with trademarks. this is about Copyrights. You don't trademark a commercial. It is copyrighted. Parody is allowed under copyright law and this is surely a parody.

  3. Trademark for "Priceless" by tiny69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Word Mark PRICELESS
    Goods and Services IC 036. US 100 101 102. G & S: Financial services, namely, providing credit card, debit card, charge card and stored value smart card services, prepaid telephone calling card services, cash disbursement, and transaction authorization and settlement services. FIRST USE: 19980200. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19980200
    Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
    Serial Number 75658792
    Filing Date March 11, 1999
    Current Filing Basis 1A
    Original Filing Basis 1A
    Published for Opposition November 30, 1999
    Registration Number 2370508
    Registration Date July 25, 2000
    Owner (REGISTRANT) MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED CORPORATION DELAWARE 2000 Purchase Street Purchase NEW YORK 105772509
    Attorney of Record COLM J DOBBYN
    Type of Mark SERVICE MARK
    Register PRINCIPAL
    Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
  4. Re:He's safe by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In order for speech to be "slander", it must be untrue. Since parodies don't purport to be truth, they are not covered.

    Oh, and you are really talking about libel, which is written. Slander is verbal.

    Please get your terminology straight before talking out of your ass.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  5. It's not the the result which matters in America by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's the cost of the process itself. For individuals It doesn't really matter whether you'll win or not. The process itself is so long, slow and expensive that it'll bankrupt you.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  6. Re:Brad needs a lawyer by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Informative

    which is somewhat unlikely

    Back when Fox News tried to C&D Al Franken's book, I assumed, like everybody else in the world, that Fox's lawyers were actually graduates of law schools that teach things like that, but we were all wrong. Fox, being one of the largest media conglomerates in the world, evidently has a legal staff who all got their law degrees at Joe's Garage and Lawer Stuff Skool. You should hear Al Franken's own description of what happened when they went to court - the judge literally laughed when he told that not only don't they have a case, but if they persist they're very likely to find out that "Fair and Balanced" isn't trademarkable.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  7. The Amex Joke (they sued over this?!?) by Tolvor · · Score: 5, Informative

    The MC joke was tasteless, and i can see MC execs wanting to kill the joke, as it simply isn't funny. The Amex joke below seems almost complimentary, as it implies that having the AmEx card gives you special privilages. I suppose that if a popular celebrity gave them a free endorsement, they would issue a cease-and-desist letter. No wonder AmEx is the card chosen by the select few who don't want their card to be accepted in many stores.

    You are invited to become a member of the American Expressway, one of the newest and most innovative road systems in America. There are many advantages to the American Expressway over the standard tollways, parkways, highways and freeways but by far the biggest advantage is:

    No Preset Speed Limit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Instead your personal speed limit is determined by your vehicle, your personal resourcefulness and your past speeding patterns. When you enter the expressway your personal id number is transmitted to Central Control to tabulate your tolls and record your initial speed (all AE members may travel at 55 with no restrictions). If you decide to pursue a greater speed then an authorization will be sent to Central Control and our highly specialized, non deterministic and little understood AI algorithm will decide if you are approved for your new speed. If you are not then a Service Technician (formally known as a State Trooper) may stop you to ask a few questions to verify that you were capable of handling your new limit (Do you increase throttle to induce oversteer in a decreasing radius turn?), that you have adequate resources (Is that a Crosley Wombat V16?) and that you are not too far out of your previous speeding pattern (Have you ever driven at 180 mph before?).

    Membership has it's Privileges

    To apply for membership call 1 800 HAUL ASS

  8. Brad Templeton by maggard · · Score: 5, Informative
    For all of those who don't know who Brad Templeton is (and judging from all the posts so far none do) Brad was the Founder, CEO, and Publisher of ClariNews, the first public-subscription online newswire (via NNTP). He's also the author of the fantastic "10 Big Myths about copyright explained" so yeah, he knows his rights. Oh, and he's Chairman of the Board of the EFF . In short he knows what he's doing and AmEx's lawyers definately tangled with the wrong perosn.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  9. Brad *doesn't* need a lawyer by maggard · · Score: 5, Informative
    Brad needs a lawyer
    Uh, no.

    As I pointed out elsewhere Brad is well aware of his rights (early online publisher, author of "10 Big Myths about copyright explained", Chairman of the Board of the EFF ), rather folks need to be more aware of their own rights.

    Also for all the lip service paid to EFF on /. it's pretty telling that this story was up for an hour, your posting was +5, and nobody here had a clue as to who Brad is...

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  10. Let jAmEx/MasterTard know you hate 'em! by infochuck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Everybody reading this thread should contact AmEx and let them know they'll be cutting up their card(s), or never getting one.

    I also suggest calling/emailing everyone you can at MasterCard for their consistent badgering of parodies - most recently (and notably) Ralph Nader's ad.

    Here's some MC contact info. Anybody got some for AmEx?

    Tell 'em you don't appreciate companies that attempt, over and over again, to bully others into compliance with THEIR wishes, against the letter and spirit of the law, and you won't stand for
    it. Call 'em again and again. They like hearing from irate consumers.

    Some folks are claiming this is "old news", but it's been going on for some time, and resurfaces every once in a while - send these folks a message NOW, and maybe they'll finally figure it out.

    MasterCard Executive e-mail addresses:
    Sharon Gamsin Vice President, Global Communications
    sgamsin@mastercard.com
    Phone: 914.249.5622

    Chris Monteiro Vice President, Global Marketing Communications
    chris_monteiro@mastercard.com
    Pho ne: 914.249.5826

    Ayde Ayala Global Communications Coordinator
    ayde_ayala@mastercard.com
    Phone: 914.249.5388

    Marc Levy Director, Global Marketing Communications
    marc_levy@mastercard.com
    Phone: 914.249.3233

    PR/Media Inquiries:
    Christina Costa
    Ph: +1 914 249 4606
    Email: christina costa@mastercard.com

    North America:
    Michael Madden
    Tel: +1 914 249 1354
    Email: Michael Madden@mastercard.com

    (Media Contact only)
    MasterCard International
    Christina Costa
    1-914-249-4606
    christina_costa@mastercard. com