Slashdot Mirror


XOrg Foundation Opens Membership and Elections

XOrg Foundation writes "To active developers and users of the X Window System:You are invited to join and help shape the direction of the new X.Org Foundation. Membership in the X.Org Foundation is now open and free.Applications for membership are sought from all contributors to the X and Desktop communities." Read more below for the rest of the information from the foundation.

The Interim Board of directors has established that examples of acceptable
contributions that will qualify you for membership in the Foundation include
coding, bug-fixing, testing, design, documentation, translation,
administration or maintenance of project-wide resources, speaking at
conferences, and supporting bugzilla or release management.

Should you wish to apply for free membership in the X.Org Foundation, then
please visit:

http://www.x.org/XOrg_Foundation_Membership.html

All Members are eligible for election to the Board of Directors and the
Architecture Group of the XOrg Foundation. The XOrg Foundation is now
seeking nominations for candidates for election to these groups.

Nominations for each election are open until 23.59 PDT on Friday 30th April
2004 for those Members of the X.Org Foundation who wish to stand for
election. You may nominate yourself for election. You may not nominate any
other member.

There will be 8 people elected to each of the Board of Directors and the
Architecture Group. In this first year of the X.Org Foundation, the four
candidates polling the most votes in each election will be granted a two
year term of office (until June 2006), and the next four candidates will
receive 1 year term of office (until June 2005). In subsequent years, four
seats of each group will be re-elected in the annual elections.

It is permissible for a candidate to stand for election for both the Board
of Directors and the Architecture Group.

The responsibilities of an elected person are detailed in the current
Bylaws of the X.Org Foundation, which can be found at:

http://www.x.org/XOrg_ByLaws_17Sep03.pdf

In addition, an elected person will be required to attend the annual
meeting of the X.Org Foundation, which will be held a location determined
in advance by the Board of Directors.

Should you wish to enter your candidacy for these elections, then please
prepare a personal statement of up to 200 words that can be provided to
prospective voters. This statement, and the statement of contribution to
the X.Org Foundation (which you completed when applying for membership)
will be made available to all voters to help them make their voting
decisions.

Once you have completed your personal statement, then you may visit:

http://www.x.org/member/XOrg_Foundation_Election_N omination.tpl

to enter your candidacy for the X.Org Foundation elections.

We look forward to your membership and candidacy submissions,

The Interim Board
X.Org Foundation."

5 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I registered, by Mister+Coffee · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I registered too.

    vote for Mister Coffee, Mister Coffee for president !!!

    --
    "Who are you?"
    "Barf!"
    "Not in here, mister. This is a mercedes."

    - Space Balls (1987)
  2. Re:Great... by Otter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    And how about they do a better job formatting the post? What was with all the line breaks?

    I'm both relieved and alarmed to see that they don't have their $TERMINFO set correctly either. I wonder if their backspace keys work?

  3. Re:ph33r!! by RLiegh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    naw, XFree86 is the destroyer of worlds, Xorg is the exiled bastard prince!!

  4. Re:More infighting? by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I find it deeply, deeply ironical that you have chosen the forum of Slashdot to decry the so-called "corporate" impact of groupthink.

    Just think where we'd be without open source groupthink.

    1. No more "(1998..2008) is the Year of Linux" articles.
    2. People accepting Linux's flaws rather than saying "My grandma uses Linux; why can't you?"
    3. People understanding the difference between user-run executables (the so-called "Windows security holes" people gripe about) and exploitable buffers (as found in dozens of Linux projects; patch 'em yourself).
    4. An end to the endless, tiresome, embarrassing debates wherein a small faction tries to take on the groupthink and is shouted down. Does this sound familiar?
      User: Can we import from closed-source program X? My company uses program X, but we would switch if a convertor were available.
      Open source developer: STFU. We don't support closed-source anything. It's your own fault for locking yourself in. Write your own convertor and release it under the GPL.
      User: But I don't know how to extend your codebase. Your documentation is five versions out of date.
      Open source developer: STFU and STFW. *plonk*
    --
    I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
  5. Re:More infighting? by molnarcs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do you often talk to yourself?