Experiences and Thoughts on SHFS?
eugene ts wong asks: "I was looking over SHFS, & I thought that this seems like a very good software package. If I understand it correctly, then it should be the defacto way to mount shares across a network. I never heard of it till today, though. What do all of you think of this? What kinds of experiences do you have? I am interested in hearing some of your stories. I heard that NFS isn't secure. How do they both compare? Would you recommend SHFS for small, medium & large businesses?"
or more to the point why do you think its secure ?
it all comes down to trust...
do you trust the network your pluged into ?
how about the people who are selling that VPN ?
I surgest that you have a look at IPSec
it works on winXP linux solaris BSD's and then find a Networked File System that is high performance
regards
John Jones
I wanted a transparent way to access my remote files over SSH since it's the only external access I trust and came upon SHFS a couple of weeks ago.
.ko module built for 2.6 that the install process copies to you lib/modules directory didn't work. There was however a .o as well built for 2.6 that worked great after I copied it manually.
It has worked out really nice and I now don't have to do the scp or SFTP dance all of the time to edit files on a remote box.
One thing I came across though during "make install" under 2.6 is that the
sounds a lot like LUFS ( http://lufs.sf.net ) which lets you mount remote filesystems via SSH, FTP, and several other novel protocols.