WebCrawler Turns 10 Today
Brian Pinkerton writes "WebCrawler, one of the first search engines on the 'Net, turns 10 today. You can read a short history of WebCrawler. When I wrote WebCrawler, one could do a credible job of crawling, indexing, and searching the Web from a single desktop PC. Today, the reality is a little bit different."
I remember when webcrawler was the only search engine I touched...
In 1996 it was nice and simple. Then as the time went on it got a bit too cluttered for my liking. Now looks like they're trying to googlize themselves with the current interface.
Holy crap!
... but do they have any relevance anymore? They're owned by InfoSpace. :P
I remember WebCrawler, but lost touch with it in around 1996, when I started religiously using AltaVista. They sure have changed a bit.
- oZ
// i am here.
Does anybody else remember getting a WebCrawler promotional CD 10 years ago? I didn't even have a CD-ROM then!
Steal This Sig
Was it 2001? The History states:
Oh, and if it is not being otherwise used, has the code for the WebCrawler spider been open-sourced?
Only Women Bleed (Sex, Sharia remix)
I remember using Webcrawler back when I got my first 14.4 Slirp connection back in 1994. It was the only way to search!
and then came the marvels of altavista.digital.com.
I'm so glad that google came along...
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
http://web.archive.org/web/19961023234707/http://w ww.webcrawler.com/
:)
Presumably connects to the current crawler which still accepts the old format
--
Callas
I think I remember why I left WebCrawler.
WebCrawler was simple and effective. But then AltaVista emerged. I started using AltaVista.digital.com, and from there WebCrawler went down hill - lots of advertising and junk that kind of made me hate it. What was once seemless and simple became noisy.
I used AltaVista for a number of years, but once again advertising got the best of it. It turned super-sophisticated, with a lot of advertising fluff and "features". Altavista was becoming overly commercialized. They had a "simple" version that was better (I forget the name [begins with an "R"?]), but soon the result sets were scewed towards advertisers and abusers.
In 2001, I made the switch to Google. It was everything that WebCrawler once was in terms of ease of use and quality of results. I've been more or less happy with Google ever since.
It is scary to think that at one point I e-mailed the WebCrawler people to ask them how it worked. In response they sent me a copy of the source (Objective C for NeXT) so I could compile it up on my NeXT PC (I had a "black" NeXT - 68000 based) to index my intranet web server.
I doubt that someone like Google would send you a copy of their source these days - even if you asked nicely.
I could never get it to compile, and I deleted it long ago, but I kind of wish I had kept it now. An interesting piece of internet history.