Slashdot Mirror


The Lyrids Are Coming!

SeaDour writes "The year's first meteor shower, the Lyrids, will peak in the pre-dawn hours of April 22nd when the Earth plows through the debris trail of Comet Thatcher at a relative velocity of 49 km/s (110,000 mph). Lyrids usually aren't as numerous as other showers (such as the famed Leonids), but they're well-known for their spectacular tails; you can expect to see about 5-20 meteors per hour, depending on the severity of your local light pollution. Unfortunately, my current location in the midwest under stormy skies puts me at a bit of a disposition, but hopefully some other Slashdotters can share their observations with us tomorrow."

3 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. Suggested Camera Settings? by Alan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a bit of an amateur photographer, and was wondering what the more experienced ones out there would set their cameras up with as far as shutter speed / apateur for this event? I figure I'll set my digital as long as it'll go at f8 or however small of an apateur I can set, but is that good or not?

  2. Live in the desert? Lucky dog! by dulles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If anybody out there lives in Nevada or near the Eastern High Sierras of California, I envy you: I would be in my car, or on my motorcycle, without hesitation, to enjoy a three hour drive into nowhere.
    In the time I lived in the Eastern High Sierras (www.deepsprings.edu) I was lucky enough to witness two Leonid showers. They were, witout fail, among the most awe-some night-time events of my life.
    So, you desert dwellers... waste no time in making the decision to go.
    (I was also once witness to a paraselene - a fabulous sort of full-circle moon-rainbow. Beautiful!)

  3. Speed vs. velocity by GrayTech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SeaDour writes "The year's first meteor shower, the Lyrids, will peak in the pre-dawn hours of April 22nd when the Earth plows through the debris trail of Comet Thatcher at a relative velocity of 49 km/s

    There is no direction given, so SeaDour should have used speed, not velocity. Or is this a convention often used in astronomy?

    --
    -- I need to remember to update my sig