Slashdot Mirror


Use x86 Boxes to Compile Mac OS X Binaries

IceFox writes "While working on the KDE on Darwin project I have only had one Mac to do development with. At the same time I have been playing around with distcc for Linux/x86 compiling. Combining the two projects I built a Mac OS X cross-compiler (for Linux/x86) and have created the DistccPPCKnoppix distribution. DistccPPCKnoppix is a 46MB Knoppix distribution based on distccKnoppix; with it you can use your extra x86 computers to build Linux/x86 or Mac OS X/PPC binaries. It might not be as shiny as an Xserve cluster, but it is a heck of a lot cheaper."

2 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. How it should be by MrIrwin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Ferrari use Fiat vans to ship car parts around.

    Mac is about the desktop, why not use cheap bland hardware for backend muling.

    And that is how it should be, we should be able to select the type of hardware for the job in hand, the software should run wherever it is required.

    --

    And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

    1. Re:How it should be by gsfprez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >why not use cheap bland hardware for backend muling?

      sometimes, you're a small business and you don't want to pay someone $xxxxxx to run your backend mules. You don't know how to grok Linux email and file servers because you're a parts manufacturer, or a solar panel business, or a gift basket maker...

      With Mac OS X Server and a $300 iMac off eBay and prudent backups, you could run email for 40 people and have your own webserver off your home DSL with no problem.

      I only know this because i did it. They know jack shit about running computers. I did the scary part and installed the server for them (i hit "okay" a lot) and then showed them...

      see this window? This is where you add users... this window shows you that your email server is running just fine.

      They call me every so often to tell me that things are fine. And i get to not answer dumbass questions and watch the playoffs on ESPN.

      They own their IT... their IT does not own them.

      With Linux, if you're going to have geeks around, then yes, its cheaper and does everything i just mentioned at a MUCH lower cost. But if you're not a geek, and you want services like email and web servers for small business, and you want rock solid performance (not Windows shitty performance) then you're wanting Mac OS X Server.

      Mac OS X Server is the greatest boon to small business i've ever seen. I have helped 4 small businesses (friends) do this - and they are all running just fine without me - and they have all the stability that they would get from a competent Linux install and a in-house geek running it.

      Mac OS X Server can get a lot of low-ball geeks fired... OR it can help low-ball geeks make a lot of money serving a lot more customers. Its all in how you think about it.

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.