Slashdot Mirror
California Panel Recommends Dumping Diebold
sdw3u writes "Wired reports that a voting panel urged California officials to stop using a voting machine made by Diebold Election Systems, and recommends that the state consider filing civil and criminal charges against the company." There's also an AP story. We covered the hearing yesterday, with Diebold admitting that their machines had numerous problems.
Only took numerous voting irregularities and complete admission of guilt. Glad to see our swift democracy in action.
...did the voting machine screw up the vote to get rid of the voting machines that were screwing up?
Did the voting panel use paper ballots or Diebold machines in their decision to dump Diebold?
-- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
To more applause and laughter, one shareholder asked if Apple would put its innovation to work and make a voting machine for the state of California.
"We have no plans to do that," said a laughing Jobs. "Hopefully they won't base it on Windows when they do make one."
"The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
The Halloween installment of This Modern World from 2003 mentions this frightening topic. In case anyone here didn't see it, here's the link.
You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
Indeed a filter could conceivably be on crack. The filter is really an army of one-handed, blind monkeys. They get crack on Fridays and beer on Sundays. It helps them stay motivated.
The five person voting panel voted 57 to 3.14 in favour of getting rid of the Diebold machines...
Would it be useful to have UN observers to ensure free and fair elections?
Virtually serving coffee
We know that New York is going to go to Kerry, no matter what happens during the campaign. NY's liberal leaning is a foregone conclusion.
You don't think the Stonecutters would pay a lot of money to DDOS all the servers in NY?
Individual clicks 'Yes'
And this was just standing up for my Christian beliefs. I wasn't flaming or putting anybody down.
Praise the Lord, brother!
Exactly! I find most democrats far to conservative for my liking.
Ultra Left Liberalism, now that's where it's!
Naw.
They let Chad make the decision. He wasn't doing anything anyway, just hanging around, dangling his opinions. Some of the women on the panel thought his dimples were cute . . .
I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.
"Diebold". SCO should have chosen that name, if you ask me. Well, maybe Diegreedy would be better, but too long.
Table-ized A.I.
...Although I believe the lititgation will fall flat on its face...
Boobs on the mind, eh?
Who let Michael Moore post on this board?
Because as Americans, it's our God-given, constitutional right to take a perfectly good, simple, working process, and fuck it up beyond recognition by application of successive layers of increasingly complex technology.
So I ask again, what's this distributed crap?
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.