Slashdot Mirror


Rendering Processors: AR350 vs AMD vs P4?

landrau asks: "I'm planning on building a render farm and was wondering whether anyone would know the pros and cons of the AR350 processor, used in The Renderdrive, as opposed to building a renderfarm with an AMD or P4 processor." While the Renderdrive looks like a real rendering workhorse that can produce some gorgeous results (see images in page header), does it justify its lofty pricetag of £6950 (over $12,300USD)?

1 of 21 comments (clear)

  1. Included renderer? by BrynM · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From my perusal of their site, it would seem to me that one of the main advantages is having a standard and fully featured renderer come with the boxes. The renderer acts like a plugin for both Max and Maya (look in the download section) and can do caustics, reflections/refraction, radiosity and such. Having that stuff out of the box is so much better than pounding out a Renderman install. And the render queue is native via a plugin to boot! This may be one of the easier solutions for setup I've seen yet if all they claim is true.

    Be sure to count the price of your rendering software into your comparrison. The price of Renderman and it's associated support could well make up the difference in your hardware costs. Don't forget to include the price of your install time (man-hours) as well.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)