There Must be a Pony in Here Somewhere

Alex Moskalyuk writes "It was supposed to be a deal of the millennium. When it was leaked to the media from the highest ranks of America Online, the journalists wanted a second source. It was just too incredible to believe, too likely to be a prank. AOL was merging with Time Warner with the terms of the deal making it more of a buyout than an equal merger. In truly Orwellian fashion, two corporations decided to treat one another as equals, although executives of newly formed AOLTW somehow always referred to the AOL part as "innovative" and thus leading into the future, while the TW was "old media" with that implies. Read on for Alex's review of a book about how that deal came to be, as well as its aftermath. There must be a pony in here somewhere author Kara Swisher pages 320 publisher Crown Business rating 6/10 reviewer Alex Moskalyuk ISBN 1400049636 summary The AOL Time Warner debacle and the quest for the digital future

Kara Swisher's There Must be a Pony in Here Somewhere is subtitled "The AOL Time Warner debacle and the quest for the digital future." Debacle is not an over-exaggeration, as the chapters of the book unveil personal, professional, corporate and political dramas happening during the so-called merger. A reporter for The Wall Street Journal, Swisher knows many AOL executives personally, and according to her stories, frequently engaged in lively conversations conducted where else but in AOL Instant Messenger, available on PCs of top management and board members as the preferred means of communication.

The title of the book takes roots from a famous joke, attributed to Ronald Reagan, where a hopeful boy is dealing with a large pile of manure. When asked why he is so insistent about digging the pile with such enthusiasm, the boy replies that with such a pile there "must be a pony in there somewhere." If you read the press lately and followed AOLTW's stock ride, you probably know that the pony wasn't quite there.

It's amazing how many optimistic forecasts and wide smiles were presented to the press and general public on the day of the merger and long after it. The word "synergy" could qualify for the most popular noun of the year, used by AOL executives almost in every sentence.

As Swisher writes on page 18, "Most people involved in the deal seem to be suffering from a peculiar amnesia now, so it's easy to forget that kind of hype and optimism. Today, almost everyone near to this toxic merger runs screaming from it in an attempt to avoid any culpability. The denials come fast and furious: Not me. I wasn't involved. I thought it was wrong from the very beginning. And - most of all - Steve Case is a big, fat loser. This was always more familiar territory for me, since that was exactly how most of the world regarded Case throughout his career. For most of it, he had always and forever been a loser."

Well, you can tell that the author is not sucking up to AOL's ex-CEO.

Swisher's book is extremely personal. Unless you've been involved in AOL or Time Warner personally, you are probably not aware of the company's management. At the time, when executives of Yahoo, eBay and other Silicon Valley startups weren't just visionaries, they were cool, AOL's top management was rather bland and plain. They weren't the cool guys, they were just managing some dial-up ISP in Dulles, VA that somehow took over the United States with its goofy icons, goofy commercials, goofy sounds and likewise membership. The author takes you through the personalities of top managers, talks about the AOL-TW off-standish behavior towards one another, questionable deal and threatening techniques used by David Colburn and AOL's Business Affairs department.

The book is easy to read and is full of interesting details. For example, the day when the deal was announced, there was another company discussing potential merger with AOL. But since everyone was involved on Time Warner deal that was supposed to be "huge," Meg Whitman and eBay crew got almost no attention from America Online, with executives constantly leaving the room and portraying an attention span of five-year-olds. Perhaps if some executives paid more attention to eBay and discuss potential buyout, the Internet would look different nowadays.

Otherwise, the book looks like a classic business study on how failures happen and what to avoid when you are faced with the task of running world's largest media outfit. It's an easy and pleasant read, informative as well as entertaining. Don't expect technical details from it in regards to AOL's operations, load balancing and nationwide dial-up network, since Swisher's main audience is business types and readers interested in details behind the "deal of the millennium". The first chapter of the book is available online on New York Times Web site.

You can read more of Alex's reviews of business and technology titles. You can purchase There Must be a Pony in Here Somewhere from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

Comments

Re:AOL/TW in the movies

[cavemanf16]

From your website essay: "Why I want to be an Industrial Engineer"

"Perhaps most important of all, Industrial Engineering can be used to solve fundamental long-term issues that civilization will exhibit. Overpopulation, transportation planning, waste and recycling center location planning, and hospital facilities layout are just a few places where Industrial Engineers can be used to greatly help. Applying our knowledge in these and other important areas will help our societies to function better in the long-term."

Those are great dreams and all, so I hope something comes of them for you, but in my current position I'd relate myself more to "The Bob's" of the world, and less to the revolutionary changer of the way daily life is run.

"So tell me... Bob; what do ya do here?"

Specialized content, not homogenized

[PurifyYourMind]

I hate seeing all the crossbranding on AOL/TW sites when all I want to see is the content. Specialized sites have always given me faster, cleaner, and more detailed news and information. For example, recently I needed to know an obscure fact about the Mozilla/Firefox browsers in a hurry. With Google I had to dig a big, but plugging the same search terms into mozillazine.org forums yielded the answer immediately.

Re:Why 6/10?

[TinheadNed]

Makes me think of Lurr from Omicron Persei 8.

We shall not destory your planet, but neither shall we give you the secret to immortality!

Re:Why 6/10? - 'Blackmail' pure and simple.

[iamcf13]

This is terrible!

Such conduct renders ratings meaningless.

There is no 'room' for a 'bell curve' which would give meaningful results.

When I read the parent, I immediately thought of this:

[1] Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
[2] And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.
[3] And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
[4] They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
[5] Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
[6] This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
[7] So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
[8] And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
[9] And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
[10] When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
[11] She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

-- John 8:1-11 of the KJV Bible at umich.edu