Slashdot Mirror


Internet2 Plus P2P Equals...

Bill, I'm lost in cyberspace... writes "News.com has an article up about a Direct Connected P2P network set up at universities which are on Internet2. This is majorly cool! More direct information is available at i2hub.com for those lucky enough to be located at a University with Internet2 access."

2 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Keep it for research... by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 0, Redundant
    . Unlike TCP, PacketBlast initially begins connections assuming absurdly high bandwidth, then scales down the window size until the dropped-packet rate falls to around 10%

    UDP is also refered to by some as the Unreliable Datagram Protocol because, unlike TCP, there is no guarantee that a UDP packet will reach it's destination. Think of TCP as two office assistants who fax each other correspondance with the page numbers on it, and check to make sure all pages were received, and if they weren't, they request the remaining pages, and repeat until they have a complete document. Think of UDP like somebody sending a bunch of postcards through the mail. If postcards don't arrive because the mailman loses them, it will not be known and nobody would look for them.

  2. Song of the piracy apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If you agree with any of this, feel free to repost it in the future.

    Song of the piracy apologist:

    (1) I don't personally believe in copying CDs illegally-- but I think we should avoid using unkind words like "piracy" to describe those that do -- instead, we should describe it as an "infringement", much like a parking infringement.

    (2) I don't believe in the record companies emotively abusing the word "theft," but I do believe in emotively abusing words like "information," "sharing," and "Copyright Enforcement Militia."

    (3) I believe that piracy is driven by "overpriced CDs" even though CDs have dropped in price over the years.

    (4) I believe that piracy is driven by overly long copyright duration, even though most pirated works are recent releases.

    (5) I believe that illegitimately downloading music is giving the author "free advertising". I don't buy any of the music I download, of course--but lots of other people probably do.

    (6) I believe that ripping off the artists is wrong. The record companies always rip off the artists. Artists support P2P, except the ones that don't (like Metallica), and they don't agree with me, hence they're greedy or their opinion doesn't count or something.

    (7) I believe that selling CDs is not a business model, but giving away things for free on the internet is.

    (8) I believe that artists should be compensated for their work -- preferably by someone else. I mean, they can sell concert tickets (which someone else can buy) or sell t-shirts (to someone else) or something. As long as someone else subsidises my free ride, I'm coooooool with it.

    (9) I believe in capitalism but only support music business models which involve giving away the fruits of ones labor for free.

    (10) I believe that copying someone elses music, and redistributing it to my 1,000,000 "best friends" on the internet is sharing. Music is made for sharing. It's my right.

    (11) I believe that record companies cracking down on piracy is "greed", but a mob demanding free entertainment is not.

    (12) I believe that it's not really "piracy" unless you charge money for it, because, receiving money is wrong, but taking a free ride is fine.

    (13) I believe that disallowing copying and redistributing music over Napster is the same as humming my favourite song in public. Because when I hum my favourite song in public, everyone likes it so much that they run home, get out their tape recorders and once they've got a recording of it, they aren't interested in hearing the original any more.

    (14) I believe that when illegal behaviour destroys a business, it's "free enterprise at work".

    (15) I believe piracy is simply "free advertising." Even though that's what radio is, but with the legal permission of the copyright holder. Basically, what I really want is to be able to choose the songs I want, listen to them whenever I want, but I don't want to have to pay for it. Essentially, I want the whole thing for free with no strings attached.

    What I find amusing is that the pirates seem unable or unwilling to distinguish between creative activity and brainless copying.

    Since a lot of the people here are GPL/OSS advocates: the "OSS way" applied to this domain is to learn how to play an instrument. Or how to sing or whatever. Then get together with a bunch of other people who can also play music, and make some noise.

    One of the unfortunate things that has happened to the OSS movement is that a lot of the loudmouth advocates for it don't understand what it's really about. They view it primarily as a means to get free stuff, and then they turn their eyes from the free stuff to the non-free stuff and think to themselves "maybe I'm entitled to get that one for free too". The noble ideals of grass roots participation in the creative process, and/or supporting it in a principled way (namely, boosting the "free foo" movement by preferring free foo to nonfree foo), or for that matter, any other form o