Chopper Pilots Train to Catch Space Probe
mav[LAG] writes "Hollywood helicopter pilots have been training for a unique catch planned for September: they will hopefully snag in midair the parachute of a capsule dropped by the Genesis project before it touches down in the Utah desert. The capsule will contain collector arrays of solar particles that should, er, shed some light on the origins of the solar system."
Here is another article (along with a huge picture!) at the official JPL NASA website.
http://almostsmart.com
... but it seems like putting a little more engineering into the thing to make a softer ground landing would have been easier, and safer, than relying on this bizarre mid-air catch. The article says it will probably survive the landing even if the pilot misses; how much extra material would have been required to soften the landing enough for them to be sure?
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
Back in the early days of spy satelites this was common practice. After a spy sat finished a roll of film it would be ejected and caught somewhere over the Pacific by a Navy pilot. IIRC they used planes and not chopers.
Thoughts on tech, Software Engineering, and stuff
a good description:
m ay/m15-016.shtml
"When a film canister was full, it was jettisoned back to earth
over Hawaii in a ceramic container that deployed a parachute.
These were retrieved in mid-air by Air Force C-119 airplanes
(the so-called "Flying Boxcars") that were outfitted with long
snag lines strung between twin tails. If the planes missed, the
canisters would splash down and float in the Pacific Ocean for
up to two days so the Navy could get to them. After two days,
salt plugs would dissolve and the canisters would sink into the
ocean depths to avoid unfriendly retrieval. Even so, at least
one canister is known to have gotten into enemy hands."
from http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2002/
We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
1. Because all the military pilots capable of doing this are tied up elsewhere?
2. Because military pilots aren't trained to do crazy-ass stunt-type flying?
3. Liability issues?
4. PR?
5. Because stunt pilots log more flying hours than military pilots and are therefore slightly better trained?
6. Because no military pilot is stupid enough to do something like this?
Pick one. Or pull it out of your butt like I did. Personally, I think #2 is probably a good reason.
To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
- mid-air catch is a proven, reasonable technique
- putting more engineering into the thing would make it heavier, less reliable, and more expensive to launch.