BBC to Try TV On Demand
Shevek writes "The UK Independent newspaper is reporting on a new BBC trial: 'Later this month, the BBC will launch a pilot project that could lead to all television programmes being made available on the internet. Viewers will be able to scan an online guide and download any show. Programmes would be viewed on a computer screen or could be burned to a DVD and watched on a television set. Alternatively, programmes could be downloaded to a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) ... By launching iMP, the BBC hopes to avoid being left at the mercy of a software giant such as Microsoft, which could try to control the gateway to online television.' Yet more proof that the BBC license fee is an unmitigated Good Thing(TM)."
Just to remind everyone, the BBC license fee is a tax on every television set in the UK.
(I don't live in the UK, but I would pay it if I could get this kind of innovation)
So maybe there's more to Dirac than just a cool open source project.
We all know that crap is king
Give us dirty laundry!
But all TV programs are already available on the net,
#tv-torrents
Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the
No, you do not pay on how many TV tuners. You pay per household.
No, you don't have to pay for radio anymore. Radio makes up less than 1% of the BBCs total spending, so I guess they figured the cost of billing people for radios was over the amount they'd actually get.
Also, portable TVs are exempt from the license.
IntechHosting - Free domain, 2GB, PHP, £4.95/$8.95
A couple of days ago, I clicked to view a video on BBC news website and it told me that I have to buy a subscription as international user. I was a bit surprised since so far, BBC had been free and even free from ads.
This page says that: "Broadband video news from the BBC is only available to international users by subscription. Find out how to get the latest broadband video news from the BBC here.
The troll is not trying to provide an actual, helpful mirror. He is trying to drive business towards his hosting service. I wish people would start modding this idiot down, especially when he makes the same post several times in the same article.
The BBC in part funds it's creative content by licensing their content in other countries, and through videos of their old content.
This money is vital for supporting new programmes.
Ideally the BBC would release their material under free licenses, but this would impact the production of new material.
Also not all the programmes shown on the BBC are produced by the BBC (for instance Have I Got News For You is made by Top Hat Productions).
ah, mod points
The BBC channels are available for free via satellite, but they are still encrypted. You need a smartcard to view them, which they will only send to UK licence-paying addresses. They may do similar for this.
They're no longer encrypted; the BBC has moved to Astra 2D, which is very difficult to receive in Europe, so they are now happy to leave them unscrambled (hence no need for a smartcard).
I appear to have a blog. Odd.
Terrestrial channels are: BBC One, BBC Two, ITV, Channel 4 and five.
BBC One & Two are paid for from the licence fee. ITV and five are fully commercial stations. Channel 4 pumps its profits back into production (AFAIK).
We have satellite TV (Sky) which has literally hundreds of channels. We have British equivalents of HBO (Sky Movies) and ESPN (Sky Sports).
Cable provides most satellite channels.
A full list of all satellite channels aimed at the UK audience si available at Lyngsat. In addition, you can also pick up hundreds of European channels.
No, BBC is not the only tv channel availbale in the Uk.
You've got a choice of:
Terrestrial (ie down an aerial channels):
BBC1 - General news, prime time soaps etc..
BBC2 - Science, documentaries, art, etc...
ITV - 'Commercial' tv, like BBC1 but with adverts
Ch4 - 'Commercial' tv - all sorts from comedy to documentaries and lots of reality tv
Ch5 - 'Commercial' tv - The newest terrestrial channel, I don't get in Wales but its supposed to be crap.
Then you have FreeView, which is digital TV from the BBC, which you need a set top box for, but there's no subscription fee. It has all the above plus more BBC channels like BBC News 24 and BBC Parrliament and kids channels.
There's also Sky, which is satellite TV and is the most popular choice. You have literally hundreds of channel and most of the popular sports programmes are now broadcast through sky. It's about 30 UKP a month.
Then there's cable, which is basically the best of Sky but available via cable rather than satellite, plus the freeview channels. It's only available in cable areas, which isn't all of the UK.
Hope that helps.
Policies
Advertising
The BBC is not permitted to carry advertising or sponsorship on its public services. This keeps them independent of commercial interests and ensures they can be run instead to serve the general public interest.
If the BBC sold airtime either wholly or partially, advertisers and other commercial pressures would dictate its programme and schedule priorities. There would also be far less revenue for other broadcasters.
The BBC is financed instead by a TV licence paid by households. This guarantees that a wide range of high quality programmes can be made available unrestricted to everyone.
The licence fee also helps support production skills, training, local or minority programmes and other services which might not otherwise be financed by the economics of pay-TV or advertising.
The BBC runs additional commercial services around the world. These are not financed by the licence fee but are kept quite separate from its public services. Profits are used to help keep the licence fee low so that UK licence fee payers can benefit commercially from their investment in programmes.
BBC
*sigh*
Murdoch is prepared to blow millions on football licenses and you stupid football fans are prepared to pay his premium.
Why is it in the BBC's interest to trump Murdoch's already astronomical bids?
Remember: Murdoch created the Market by realising that football fans were gullible fools with too much money in their pocket.
I'll believe it when I see it. After all, it took well over twenty years for Spider-Man to make it to the theatres after the original announcements
It's in production. The executive producers are Russell T Davies (author of Queer As Folk, Second Coming and Bob & Rose), Mal Young (BBC Head of Continuing Drama Serials) and Julie Gardner (BBC Wales Head of Drama). Line Producer is Phil Collinson, Head of Casting is Andy Pryor, Script Editors are Elwen Rowlands and Helen Raynor. The thriteen, 45-minute episodes are currently being written by Davies, Paul Cornell, Steve Moffat (Coupling author), Mark Gatiss (League Of Gentlemen) and Rob Shearman.
Filming at BBC Wales is booked to start in July this year. The Doctor has been cast - Christopher Eccleston (Second Coming, Shallow Grave, Elizabeth, 28 Days Later), and story titles have been announced for some of the 1st season (episode 1 - 'Rose', episode 2 'The End Of The World', episodes 9 and 10 'Aliens Of London' (the Steve Moffat episodes) and episodes 12-13 - 'The Parting Of The Ways'.)
While rumours that the budget will be a milion pounds per episode have been dismissed, Mal Young has confirmed that the new series has one of the highest budgets of any BBC Drama ever.
Oh, and Russell Davies has said that it will *definitely* be a continuation of the original series, and is, emphatically, not a reboot.
This is definitely going to happen. It's already happening. The BBC are plugging it as the flagship of their Saturday night schedules next year.
You are the very definition of the fat-arse, lazy moron yank with delusions of godhood... and like most of your ilk, you have absolutely no concept of history or your place in it.
Kiss my arse and lick my boots, yank.
The Norwegian Broadcast Company (NRK, similar license model as BBC) has done something similar for a while now. All the programs they produce inhouse is aired live online, and is also stored in the archive. so you can access it whenever you like.
For the moment this is free for everybody (registration required though), and can be reached abroad (handy for me as an exchange-student in the UK).
-- If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?
I've got a billygoat you can have, Mr. Troll... ;-)
a) UK TV channels *do* pay for US shows, cash on the nail.
b) $7 trillion that would never have been needed if a bunch of right-wing fanatics hadn't been running the US for 40 years. Mutually-assured destruction requires "mutual" up-arming, and the US always liked going one better on that score. (And oh boy, are the good times rolling again in this presidency!)
c) Sorry, but the UK repaid every last cent from WW2. And the US got a great deal with technology transfer, since the Brits taught the US a whole lot about computers, radar, aircraft design, sub tracking, etc. Oh, and about believing British intelligence reports, after a few unfortunate incidents like Pearl Harbour...
Grab.