Slashdot Mirror


Gas Plasma Antennas Help Wi-Fi Security

mindless4210 writes "Markland Technologies has developed a new gas plasma antenna technology which could help to secure wireless networks. The technology allows for highly directive and electronically steerable digital data transmission via solid-state semi conductor based plasma generators. A plasma antenna can reposition itself at very high speeds, as well as change it's beamwidth and bandwidth, creating spatial and spectral security features which are not presently available with conventional WiFi antenna technology."

12 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Now you see it...... by erick99 · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is a very cool technology. This antenna essentially "disappears" when it is not being used, making it fairly "stealthy". And, while a traditional metal rod or dish antenna is "cut" to a specific or very narrow range of frequencies, it would appear that the gas plasma antenna can essentially reconfigure itself to rapidly change frequencies. As a ham radio operator, I can really appreciate how useful that could be.

    Happy Trails!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Now you see it...... by Bagheera · · Score: 2, Informative

      It certainly seems like a cool technology, but I'm not sure how it would apply to WiFi - or even Ham for that matter. Yes, a tight beam antenna will provide some slight level of added security (while not substituting for encryption) there is the issue of power requirement - you need to create that plasma - fuel requirement - the gas you're ionizing - and the shielding requirements. The first one is a killer for portable devices (the usual application for this technology - if you're running a desktop, wires are dramatically more secure), while the second two add size and weight to the device. Both Bad Things (tm) for a portable device.

      For an amature radio application, I'm not sure where it was frequency agile. Being able to alter the pattern and available bandwidth don't mean it's also changing it's resonant length - which is what we're usually concerned with when setting up a multi-band antenna. 1/4 wavelength at 20M is still a 5M antenna. Plasma or not, it's gonna be fairly big.

      From the pictures in the article, it looked like they were using the plasma to replace the reflector in a conventional antenna, rather than using it as the driven element. That's something the military would probably love (stealthy antennas) but that wouldn't have much practical use for WiFi.

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  2. Are We Ready for This? by cupofjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hello, high voltage. It's one thing to put "phased array" antennas on naval vessels, but entirely another to put them in a house. Not to mention the voltage difference needed to generate the plasma.

    Fluorescent bulbs use this sort of principle, too - surely our new gas-plasma antennas aren't to be made of glass?

    Hrm. Perhaps they are.

  3. Re:My brain hurts by erick99 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  4. Military applications by Inigo+Soto · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to their site, plasma antennas are interesting for short-pulse applications, such as radar, IFF... Wifi is not mentioned, just a vague "high speed data communications" after a wealth of military applications.

  5. Re:Directional arials... by pclminion · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why do you say "virtual?" The antenna is just as real as a metal wire, the only difference is that the positive charges in a plasma are free to move, whereas in a metal the positive charges are locked in the lattice.

    Just because it's not a solid doesn't make it spooky or virtual...

    virtual radio telescopes could be of practically unlimited size, by this arrangement.

    Not really, since the plasma has to be kept "hot" and at low pressures in order to prevent it from recombining back into "normal" uncharged matter again. A device capable of maintaining such a large plasma would require enormous amounts of power and maintainence.

  6. Re:creating spatial and spectral security features by pclminion · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just because you don't understand the "big words" doesn't mean they're meaningless.

    Spatial security == the beam goes where you want, as opposed to all over the place.

    Spectral security == the edges of the beam spectrum are very well defined, with very little "spill" into neighboring frequencies.

  7. Re:Vaporware by Tlosk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because of the speed with which they can revert to nonplasma state they can prevent ringing and other artifacts inherent to metal antennae, increasing the fidelity and reliability as well as the signal processing logic on the receiving end.

    There's also the weight and size issue, with the plasma coming in both lighter and smaller to an equivalent conventional one.

    But you're right of course that it will be a while or perhaps never that it will be just as easy or easier to work with plasma. So you might not see one on a $10 walkman, but that's not to say that there aren't a lot of applications where the benefits would afar outweight the difficulty.

  8. Plasma antennas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    are also nothing new. This company's been around for some time doing similar stuff.

  9. Backscattering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This sounds like mostly B.S.

    At microwave frequencies (at which Wi-Fi operates), just about every object scatters (reflects, diffracts) incident radiation. As a matter of fact, many RF antenna designs are "parasitically" directional, but rely on backscattering to produce a more omnidirectional response.

    Assuming that an adapative antenna array (which seems to be what the original press release describes) can target a specific client, sensitive near neighbors will inevitably be able to eavesdrop. Furthermore, an array of radiating slots or conductive elements with solid-state switches or phase shifters may achieve the same result without the need for using plasma.

    As a side note - for those that think gas plasma is something magical, keep in mind that many vacuum fluorescent and early laptop displays used this principle economically and safely, as do a variety of commodity devices like fluorescent and HID lamps.

  10. Re:Markland Technologies by enosys · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks for pointing out their other stuff. IMHO it discredits them. The Vapour Trace technology certainly isn't new, and I doubt that Acoustic Core could compete with the scanners that are already out there. As for a keyless cipher, I don't see how you could do cryptography without keys except if it's quantum cryptography or something like that. Security thorough obscurity?

  11. Re:My brain hurts by pluvia · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dangit, I forgot to correct the link in my previous comment, sorry.