Reboot Linux Faster Using kexec
An anonymous reader writes "Even if your work doesn't require you to reboot your Linux machine several times a day, waiting for a system to reboot can be a real drag. Enter kexec. Essentially, kexec is a fast reboot feature that lets you reboot to a new Linux kernel -- without having to go through a bootloader. Faster reboot is a benefit even when uptime isn't mission-critical -- and a lifesaver for kernel and system software developers who need to reboot their machines several times a day. Kexec is currently available on the x86 32-bit platform only."
Rebooting a box that has SCSI drives means that the BIOS does a scan of the SCSI bus that takes a while, and then the new kernel does the same thing. That's the slowest part of my boot process, and it looks like kexec will bypass the BIOS half of it.
In 'Windos' terms, this is equivalent to the 'shift+restart' feature on earlier windows. You would press shift while hitting restart and it would only restart without rebooting the machine.
The boot loader spends most of its time waiting for the user to press a key, so they can enter custom boot parameters. If you set the timeout to 0 in LILO or GRUB, loading the kernel happens almost instantly.
The BIOS startup routine is longer, especially if you have a SCSI card. (I have 2 of those in my machine, and they account for most of the wait during startup.)
WWTTD?
If you read the article, it says that kexec doesnt do a normal,clean shutdown, so you have to stop all running programs and unmount all partitions before running kexec to do a reboot.
When i boot into linux, it takes longer to start up services than it does to go through the BIOS, SATA raid controller BIOS, grub's 3 second time out, and the loading of the linux kernel (before initd takes over).
however, this program is still in ints infancy and no doubt someone will create an initd that can utilize kexec in a run level for rebooting without a full shutdown. But I dont think it will be that much quicker.
I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
Try using a system which doesn't kill each service one by one in a serial manner; the difference between shutdown speed in, say, Slackware or FreeBSD compared with RedHat and friends is quite significant. You'll have to learn to live without the fancy green [OK]'s though :)
You are right. Something is decidedly wrong on your system. It takes me, IIRC, under a second to go from "bootloader screen" to "kernel spitting out init data". It is definitely not twenty seconds.
Now, the time spent sitting in init scripts when a desktop could be brought up much faster and initscript loading continued in the background is an arguable issue...
May we never see th
The biggest gain I can think of would be moving from an initscript system in which all services are serially numered to one where dependencies are expressed with a directed acyclic graph. All you have is "X depends on network being up" "cups depends on network being up", etc.
You mean like in Gentoo?
RogerDo you have any better hostages?
You mean like BSD init + rcorder, which predates Gentoo.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON