Slashdot Mirror


MMO Creators Follow The Virtual Money Trail

Thanks to Wired News for its article discussing the dysfunctional economies of massively multiplayer games. The piece references an economic analysis by Raph Koster regarding Star Wars Galaxies, in which he mentions the game "...uses what is called a faucet-drain economy. You can visualize a spigot of cash coming into the game, a big ol' sink where the money sloshes around, and a set of drains where the money goes out the bottom." Virtual economist Edward Castronova also comments, concerned about the proletariat and the bourgeoisie: "The wealth distribution is not just unequal, it is incredibly unequal... Raph says it is similar to the distribution of wealth in (real-life) economies, which it is, but even the worst robber-baron economies were not this bad." In the end, though, Koster argues: "You don't get to ignore the economy, but absolutely, the goal is the fun, not Berkshire Hathaway."

52 comments

  1. Information readily available by Oriumpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for a long long time on the Mud-Dev mailing list. In fact a point of discussion many times, and not just the faucet drain economy model either.

    Mud Dev Faq
    Full archive here

  2. Once Again by Apreche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must make another post about how Puzzle Pirates is the best. The entire game is based on economy. Sure, money comes in and out, but it sloshes a whole hell of a lot. The entire game is based on the economy, shop owning, pillaging, trading. Getting raw materials and manufacturing them into stuff that you use to make other stuff that you use to get more materials. What really makes puzzle pirates have the best economy is that labor plays a critical role. If you want to make stuff you need actual people to devote their labor to you. In turn you must pay them money for their services. Not only that, but first you need to have a very expensive shop to even begin thinking about it. It's complex and that's what makes it great, play puzzle pirates the only mmo worth playing right now.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Once Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What about Eve Online? I was in the beta for a short while and that game seemed to be all about the economy, also. That and a lot of mining. ;)

      Anyone that's currently playing Eve, what's the current state of its economy compared to most MMO's?

    2. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Puzzle Pirates had potential, but right now the vast majority of interesting-things-to-do is restricted to the few players who have been granted monopolies. One of the moderators of the Game Design forums deletes posts and locks threads in order to prevent discussion of alternative designs that would make the game more enjoyable for newcomers. Every couple of weeks you discover another undocumented bias. Stay away.

    3. Re:Once Again by wgnorm · · Score: 4, Informative


      This is really a mischaracterization of the game, and I don't see how you could reach this point of view.

      I've never played any game that's so open and inviting to new players. For new pirates just starting out it's a fun game environment centered around playing puzzles. As you advance through the game you can get more involved in the social/political aspects (as well as perfect your puzzle skills) and try to achieve higher rank and status in a crew or flag. I suppose if you're completely incapable of social interaction you might not get far beyond the basic game, but that's not the same as others more adept at it being "granted monopolies."

      As far as the Game Design forum, I have to wonder if you heard this second-hand. There is a pretty free flow of ideas and debate from people in all levels of the game, and the developers openly discuss and interact with anybody who has a good, original idea or insight, both in the forums and actually in-game. I remember standing on the docks on one of my first days playing the game, and carrying on a conversation with one of the lead designers regarding ideas for new clothing options. For a team of six developers to spend so much time interacting with players of all levels is really amazing.

      The only restriction of speech that occurs (thankfully) on the forums is when frequently discussed issues are brought up again and again. Those posts are often locked and moved to the archive ("Davy Jones' Locker"). This is done in an effort to keep the forums clean and readable for newer players. If you think heated debate over game design issues doesn't take place, you have obviously never read those forums.

      As far as free economy aspects of the game, just in the last couple of weeks a major update to the game was released that introduced 1) bazarres, where anyone who owns a ship can get involved directly in the economy by selling goods at a stall, and 2) the ability to blockade and claim entire islands. One flag just conquered a major island in the last couple of days (or "liberated" it from the developers) and declared it a free market where they will try to institute a democratic system of government with the involvement of the citizens and shop-owners.

      If you haven't played this game, ignore the parent and check it out:
      Puzzle Pirates

    4. Re:Once Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not an anonymous coward just don't have the time to create an account I will never use.

      While at times the person you are referring to is a little zealous with his moderator power, most of the posts he deletes or locks are on topics that have been discussed to death. We have learned from experience that repeated threads and ideas usually don't get constructively discussed. And with some posts it is a simple matter that the poster didn't look on the front page of the game design page to see that his idea is still actively being discussed in another thread.

    5. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Too bad a fraction of the effort put into trampling customers' posts in the forums cannot be redirected to updating the documentation.

    6. Re:Once Again by Merusdraconis · · Score: 1

      Well, the forum's moderated by a player, and the documentation is being looked at by players, at the docs are basically web pages fed into the game.

      I guess you could say the same thing about any project, though - why don't more developers spend more time documenting? They're too busy coding, mostly, although the documentation when up to date is generally of a high standard and does a good job of explaining things - nothing like man pages, that's for sure.

      One of the moderators of the Game Design forums deletes posts and locks threads in order to prevent discussion of alternative designs that would make the game more enjoyable for newcomers. Every couple of weeks you discover another undocumented bias. Stay away.

      Funny, I know I've gotten away with every stupid idea I've proposed that would make it easier for newbies to get into the game. And what sorts of biases do you refer to?

      (As to monopolies, we're talking about people who play games on the Internet. They're made of string and data, and one slight push makes them fall over very easily. This applies not only to Puzzle pirates, but to most things borne of the Internet.)

    7. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      the forum is moderated by a playerRight, so you get to see a forum "moderator" threaten other players with in-game retaliation.

      They are too busy codingSuggestions to spare the developers by making the docs available on a Wiki were dismissed by the same moderator on the grounds that his eyes glazed over whenever he saw the word Wiki. Maybe you will host one on drod.net?

    8. Re:Once Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I mean... it's not all that complex... you can learn how to play it rather easily without relying on the documentation -- if something confuses you there's always other people around who are more than happy to explain the concepts. Besides, there's a lot more to the game than the forums. And hell, if you think the moderator-in-question is threatening you then /mute him in the game and never think about it again.

    9. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      A company that tolerates a customer support guy who berates and threatens customers and favors deleting posts or hiding threads over updating the doumentation is a dubious contender for your entertainment budget. I've seen a lot of people get burnt, and there's no excuse for it. They are charging $120 / year to play.

    10. Re:Once Again by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

      Ah, Slashdot Trolling. First of all, i'd like to shamelessly and pointlessly brag about my UID to point out that i'm one of the original trolls. Probably why said player-moderator finds me vehemently distasteful, to say the least. Oh, very, very least.

      That said he's never deleted any of my posts, nor am I aware of any posts being deleted, although they certainly get locked when the same discussion is taking place simultaneously in another thread. It's somewhat akin to how Slashdot moderates submissions, and I fail to see how there's anything wrong with it.

      They put together a great product and provide updates at what seems to me an astonishing pace. There was a period of still waters while blockades were being prepared, but delays before major feature additions are to be expected.

      You've seen a lot of people get burnt how exactly? Puzzle Pirates, famed as it is, has 5,000 subscribers. I'm rather curious to know how many of them you know got 'burned', espically considering that a large number of that 5,000 recieved special deals for being alpha or beta testers. They were selling lifetime and two year subscriptions to alpha and beta testers on, what I would call, the cheap.

      Furthermore, the personal web-pages of the developers, particularly Cleaver's, demonstrate that the company has a very, very keen understanding of online gaming, and how not to burn people. In fact, I think it's the first game i've ever paid for based even in part on reading a developers comments and realizing how amazingly freaking right he was.

      By the way, the documentation was updated fairly recently, around last week or so I think. If you really want to get that up in arms about documentation, I suggest Open Source Software.

    11. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      ... the documentation was updated fairly recentyl, around last week or so.

      Critical aspects of gameplay remain undocumented as of today despite multiple complaints in the forums.

      The people who get burned are not the ones with the sweetheart alpha / beta subscriber packages, but the ones who come to the game now.

      Presumably the developers are content with 5,000 subscribers and do not want the 100,000 that City of Heroes achieved in less than two weeks.

    12. Re:Once Again by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

      Critical aspects of gameplay such as what, exactly?

      5,000 vs 100,000 users has little or nothing to do with a moderator on a forum or documentation.

      Take Ultima Online for example. Documentation included a quick view card, online documentation very spotty. Very popular. Burnings? Lord British assassinated, beta tester banned.

      Puzzle Pirates has several disadvantages when it comes to getting subscribers, and none of them are because they have poor customer support.

      1. Puzzle Pirates has no shelf space. 100,000 subscribers at launch is great and all, but it means nothing for City of Heroes. If they sell like what, half a million more copies, they'll /almost/ beat deer hunter, right? And Deer Hunter was such an excellent game. Eat poo, five billion flies can't be wrong.

      2. Java implementation. It's a tough stigma to get over, and i'm pretty sure anyone who reads games.slashdot.org is aware of it and likely as not holds a bias. How many of us /didn't/ mock Sun when they put out that gamining initiative? It's really a shame Sun and 3 Rings (Puzzle Pirate Developers) haven't gotten together in some sort of marketing pact, since PP has pretty much done what Sun was begging for.

      3. Marketing. The vast majority of people only want to pay one monthly charge for an online game at a time, not to mention the time investment MMORPG's take if they already play one. Most of the word of mouth about puzzle pirates has gone between people already paying such a fee. They'll try it, but they aren't likely to give up their EQ or Shadowbane characters for it. Too much time has already been invested.

      4. Gameplay style. Puzzle games are a very niche market.

    13. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      YoHoHo! Puzzle Pirates has several disadvantages to getting subscribers, and none of them are because they have poor customer support.

      Why add to natural disadvantages with a customer support representative who disparages customers?

    14. Re:Once Again by Merusdraconis · · Score: 1

      Right, so you get to see a forum "moderator" threaten other players with in-game retaliation.

      Link, please.

      Suggestions to spare the developers by making the docs available on a Wiki were dismissed by the same moderator on the grounds that his eyes glazed over whenever he saw the word Wiki. Maybe you will host one on drod.net?

      Here's the post referred to: I've never met a wiki I liked. Well, I fully admit that I might just not 'get it.'

      Of course, he's a player moderator, so it makes no difference to what he thinks - the developers love wikis (see We talked about it on the way to lunch a while back... ) so they're the ones you have to pay attention to. In this case, it's much like /., where the ability to moderate does not influence the ability to have an opinion (or indeed the quality of that opinion - I've seen nothing but good wikis.)

      As to DROD.net hosting a YPP wiki, I doubt we'd do that. Firstly, we've still got to escape IPowerWeb (mostly done, but it's somewhat embarrasing that I've still got the link appearing on every post to an 'account suspended' page.) And secondly, DROD.net's for a different game, and I like to keep my personal and professional lives separate. Also, someone else is paying for hosting. Then again, I could always bring it up...

      It seems more that you have a beef with atteSmythe, the player in question, than with the game. In which case I suggest you e-mail the developers (start here: http://www.threerings.com) and outlines, with specific examples, exactly how you feel and imploring them to at least remove his moderator status (which extends only as far as the Game design forum). Instead of complaining on /.

      For the record, I have no problem with atteSmythe - the only moderating I've seen him do is locking and moving threads that go off-topic or contain ideas that have been done to death, and in those cases he waits a few days so the explanation can be seen (there's also a few stickied threads that summarise all the common ideas considered and how they fared.) But then, I haven't seen anything that has been deleted with no trace whatsoever, obviously. So if there's a lot of stuff deleted without any sign, I'd want to hear about it. So e-mail them already.

    15. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Instead of complaining on /.

      I completely agree that Y!PP's lack of a well-functioning Complaint Department is neither News for Nerds nor Stuff that Matters.

    16. Re:Once Again by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

      Why exactly were you posting doc questions to the game dev forum anyway? What's wrong with the help forum?

      And the individual in question does nothing to disparage customers, at least no more so than any other online game forum. You'll never see anything like the Alphaville Herald debacle in Puzzle Pirates.

      Concidently, if the Alphaville Herald debacle proves anything, it's that the vast majority of users don't give two kanga's about "customer support representatives who disparage customers." Which Puzzle Pirates does not anyway.

    17. Re:Once Again by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Answered in your livejournal since this is neither news for nerds nor stuff that matters.

    18. Re:Once Again by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

      How cute.

  3. Devaluing Items and Currency by Ieshan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Devaluing Items and Currency is a big problem in many MMOs. Items/Currency are really one of three reasons people stay in the MMO game they're in, the other two are "People Social" and "Skills/Character".

    An MMO with a more stable value on high-value items and large sums of money will be more likely to keep players around. It's just no reason to stay if EVERYONE has that Vorpal Sword of Timespendedness that you spent 5 months getting, but can now be had for 5 minutes of play-time because they're manufactured for mega-cheap by Craftsman1, Craftman2, Craftsman3, or had by camping for a few days in some random location with a dozen other people.

  4. Well I guess this proves... by Qwaniton · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that MMOs are just like Real Life(TM), only expensive!

    Wait, Real Life is too. Never mind :-)

  5. Wants and needs by MMaestro · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The wealth distribution is not just unequal, it is incredibly unequal... Raph says it is similar to the distribution of wealth in (real-life) economies, which it is, but even the worst robber-baron economies were not this bad.

    True but in a player run economy, most things that PLAYERS sell at generally the premium stuff. Whereas the stuff sold by NPCs are the more generic, bland stuff.

    For example in FFXI (which I play in now), theres two primary classifications of equipment. Starting/Basic equipment and Premium equipment. The first group is basic, your cheap basicly RAGS equipment and whatever gets tossed your way (its actually not uncommon to see level 20+ players running around in level 9 equipment sometimes).

    The second class is where the article at hand seems to have the biggest beef. We all know the basics of a player run economy, players craft certain items that are sold NOWHERE ELSE and sell them to other players. However the problem with this is, it comes down to the age old rule of 'supply and demand.' MOST players DEMAND to have that badass +1 Sword to go along with their +1 Armor, +1 Rings, and +1 Helm. However theres only a FEW number of people who can SUPPLY these items (visit the Auction House in FFXI, any server, and more than 50% of the items listed there won't have that item up for bid). So what happens (after raising the price to cover expenses)? You raise the price some more!

    That +1 leather armor which ANYONE can make for 500 gil? That only costs 300 gil to make. But that special, job specific, quest only, high fame only, high level only armor? 300,000+ gil. The legendary fishing pole which LITERALLY takes MONTHS to obtain? (You have to hand in 10,000 of a certain type of fish and they sell for 300 EACH at the Auction House. You do the math.) Well, lets just say the only listings of them being sold (on my server at least) were from the owners, to themselves.. for 3 MILLION GIL. (I've heard of listings going as high 8 million on other servers.)

    In real life, robber-barons (most notably) with oil. In MMO games they deal with the 'phat l3wt'. But they never dealt with things such as food, clothes, and shelter.

    1. Re:Wants and needs by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      if FFXI had a better crafting system, gear prices would come down considerably. considering that it takes a crystal to make anything and crystals are semi-rare drop items, the only people making things are those that manage to hoard a bunch of crystals and grind through enough to get decent at their craft.

      after about a week of experiementing with crafting in FFXI, I gave up on it completely, since it was just too costly to advance as a crafter.

      Horizons, on the other hand, has probably the most open crafting system out there. It's extremely easy for anyone to decide to be a crafter and start cranking out tier 1 items. It does get progressively harder(tier 4 armor is very hard to make), however, there's not the same kind of beating your head against the wall, trying to break through the first baby steps of crafting and you only do as much crafting as you want to.

      the supply and demand system doesn't really apply with crafting in Horizons. Looking at the consigners, the things that sell for the most, are rare mob drops, used to enhance crafting. player crafted gear is still cheap.

      Hell, I just got a full set of steel platemail (tier 3, requires a level 60+ armorer with 100 being current max level) done, complete with all the special techniques that would fit for tips. all I had to do was supply him with the materials for the techniques (the aforementioned pricey rare drops).

      All that crafting took about half an hour for us to go through and figure out exactly what to make and what ingrediants were needed. and he did it for tips. and I didn't even KNOW the guy. I just sent a tell to the highest level armorer online!

      honestly, I think player-run economies are more influenced by supply (how much of a pain in the ass it is to make things) than demand.

    2. Re:Wants and needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmmm... I disagree entirely with the FFXI-related content of this post. To call crystals a "semi-rare" drop item is, to be blunt, completely wrong.

      For those who haven't played the game, the crystal works as follows. Players can ask NPC guards in their home cities (or their embassies in other cities) to cast a spell called Signet on them. This is free of charge and any player can do it. The effect of the spell lasts for a few hours and it causes enemies killed by the player to drop crystals (there are also other effects, but these aren't significant by now.) So long as a player is under the effect of Signet, any enemy they kill that is strong enough to grant them experience points when killed (ie. Not more than about 5 or 6 levels lower than the player) has a chance (roughly 50/50) to drop a crystal, with an elemental property determined by the type of enemy killed (eg. wasps drop air crystals, worms drop earth crystals). In a party, if more than one player has Signet, you may well get more than 1 crystal per kill. In other words, these are extremely common items indeed.

      In terms of cost, a stack of 12 of the cheapest crystals (usually Earth and Water) will sell for about 400 gil in the auction houses in the start-cities, while the more expensive ones (such as fire), will sell for 1800 a stack of 12. 400 gil is a pitance in game terms. There are many obstacles to a successful crafting career, but I'm not aware that crystals are really one of them. The biggest problem is that people try to get started in it before they know the game mechanics well and before they have the funds to cover the startup costs.

    3. Re:Wants and needs by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they must have upped the drop rate since I quit, because it was more like a 10-20% chance about 6 months ago. glad to hear they made crafting less of a pain.

    4. Re:Wants and needs by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      FFXI needs PvP. Bear with me, this is on topic. My kid brother is obsessed with the game. Me, I put about six hours into it, hit level 7, and got bored with all the level grinding, "buy my ore!" shouting, and broken NPC economics (900gil for a frickin HEAL potion?!). We were joking around that if the game had PvP, we could get a consortium of high-level bruisers together and make our own little Fanguul-brother Bastok Mafia. Now THAT would be an interesting player-run economy, providing the PvP had any decent penalties for losing.

    5. Re:Wants and needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      FFXI has PVP. Fortunately, it's extremely limited in nature (completely opt-in, no penalty for death, specific areas and times only). I say Fortunately, because the vast majority of the people who want full PVP, like the poster above, seem to want it so that they can behave like a bunch of children and make the game less fun for others. There are plenty of PVP oriented MMORPGs out there. FFXI isn't one of them. It's also the most popular of them these days. Go figure...

    6. Re:Wants and needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you want player run mafia games mught I suggest Sims Online ;)

    7. Re:Wants and needs by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1

      Raph is talking about SWG here, in which most items are player crafted - premium items or not.

    8. Re:Wants and needs by a+hollow+voice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just FYI, this is probably the specific change that fixed the crystal drop problem:

      If you quit 6 months ago or so, that was right after the NA release, and nobody was getting crystals. Crystals don't drop in regions controlled by beastmen. Since all the noobs were running out when they got the game and getting killed left and right, beastmen controlled all areas near towns. I had the game for 3 weeks before I saw a single crystal (on La Theine Plateau, for those who play the game - Ronfaure was always under beastmen control).

      Probably about the time you left, they changed the rules so people under level 4 or 5 (I forget) don't affect the control of a region when they die, and now crystals are common drops in the noob zones at low levels.

    9. Re:Wants and needs by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Except for the fact that nearly 70+% of all high levelers are Japanese players and they don't seem to like American players... (the highest non-Japanese player I've seenen was around level 50, the cap is 75.)

      And as it stands, dying in FFXI is too strict to have a free flowing PvP system. As it stands dying takes away 5-10% of the amount of experience you need to gain the next level (get Raise casted on you decreases that amount) so at first dying doesn't mean much (for the first 3 levels this rule actually doesn't apply so newbies can die all they want in the beginning.) Doesn't sound like much when you only need 2000 exp to gain a level (level 10), but when you need 5700 exp (level 29) to gain a level losing 570 exp begins to hurt. To add insult to injury, yes you can LEVEL DOWN and the game lets you know it with a farting like noise and having the words 'Level Down...' appear over your body so everyone can see it.

      Oh and the Heal potions? Those are pretty much useless. Get a White Mage in the party and you won't need potions. Course healers being wimps in this game, they're very rare (White Mages consist of about 5-10% on my server.. sucks really.)

    10. Re:Wants and needs by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Roleplaying == behaving like children? I was thinking more along the lines of a real player-controlled economy, not the deliberate screwing with it. Of course, now that I think about it, those hi-leveling japanese players aren't the ones /SHOUTing 24/7 in the marketplace, doing nothing but wasting server cycles hawking their BS.

      There's a difference between PvP oriented and PvP allowed. Just because something's popular doesn't make it good. I'd rather play a RP oriented MMORPG, but those never seem to last. Either they sputter out, or you get an influx of morons that change the entire point of the game to level grinding and who has the most virtual money (not even mentioning the fools who pay REAL money for fake property.

      I'll stick to MUDding.

  6. Comparisons to real life fearsomely accurate by mactari · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Koster responds that while "the truly obscene amount of money is in the hands of a few," the situation is not as bad as it sounds. And that, he says, is because there are tens of thousands of what he terms "try me out" Galaxies characters lying dormant that skew the distribution numbers.

    "They are dirt-poor," Koster says, "and they really distort the statistics."


    This is the part that gets me about all the /.ers running around with Atlas Shrugged images and quotes on their websites. In an pure market economy where value is placed on everything, there are people whose lives the market decides aren't worth supporting. In a 100% open market economy, survivial of the fittest is right back in play, and people die.

    Though you might argue it's also very easy for us to ignore the dying caused by our own present system, it's a factor I haven't seen one economist mention in plain speak in their studies, anecdotal and more rigorous. The fantasy equivalent of death (a stream of unrenewed accounts, among other things) is being ignored.

    I played Ultima Online for quite some time, and I have to imagine the routine of, "Hack tree, build bow, repeat *100, sell bows, buy adventuring gear, get player-killed [by another player], rinse, repeat," didn't appeal to everyone.* These people left the game -- their account were, for all practical purposes, killed. These players gave up the will to live in this fantasy world. And the money they earned during their brief lives stayed right where the market placed it -- with the powerful.

    Anyhow, not to belabor the point, but I wonder if those "dirt poor" characters "lying dormant" don't represent the people a true, ideological market economy would leave in our gutters even moreso than our governed market does today.

    (* -- Yes, I realize UO changed the rules to eliminate pkilling quite a bit, but the old days, phew!)

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
    1. Re:Comparisons to real life fearsomely accurate by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      No they don't. They are extra characters that people don't play. I play Star Wars Galaxies and have about 6 characters. Two of my characters have money, the other ones only have the 250 credits you start with. This does distort the statistics quite a bit and I imagine there are a bunch of other people who do the same thing.

    2. Re:Comparisons to real life fearsomely accurate by JavaLord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No they don't. They are extra characters that people don't play. I play Star Wars Galaxies and have about 6 characters. Two of my characters have money, the other ones only have the 250 credits you start with. This does distort the statistics quite a bit and I imagine there are a bunch of other people who do the same thing.

      There are, most SWG power players have a few characters of different classes which they can use to "buff" (enhance) their main character. It's nice to have a second character on the same server who is a doctor that you can log in to treat your main character (if you have 2 computers). Also, you can have a merchant that makes the money for your brawler, who just tips him whatever he needs. The merchant could appear dirt poor, because he's constantly tipping the brawler (main character).

      They could measure the economy more accurately if they had 1 character per account.

    3. Re:Comparisons to real life fearsomely accurate by Moonshadow · · Score: 1

      Uhm...they do have one character per account (per server), unless you unlock your Jedi slot. I have friends that actually have multiple accounts, but they're certainly in the minority, given the financial burden inherent in supporting multiple accounts. IIRC, this was done specifically to prevent the usage of mule/buffer characters.

    4. Re:Comparisons to real life fearsomely accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm...they do have one character per account (per server), unless you unlock your Jedi slot. I have friends that actually have multiple accounts, but they're certainly in the minority, given the financial burden inherent in supporting multiple accounts. IIRC, this was done specifically to prevent the usage of mule/buffer characters.

      it seems most of the people I have run into have multiple accounts on one server. Of course, most of the people I talked to were in the same clan/family or whatever. Maybe they were just a group of power gamers?

    5. Re:Comparisons to real life fearsomely accurate by Moonshadow · · Score: 1

      That'd be my guess. Multiple characters can make the game go a lot faster, but you have the overhead of $50 per client + $15/month per account. One of my more obsessive friends have four accounts, which amounts to $200 initial startup and $48-$60 month, depending on her billing setup. That's...a lot of money to put into a game for most anyone, really.

  7. Um, no by (trb001) · · Score: 1

    The sink is basically the whole game. It's the bank accounts, the player inventories, all the money that is used for trades and transactions among players.... When money goes out the bottom, it's deleted from the system, rather than circulating back to a central bank.

    Having never played Galaxies, perhaps I'm speaking out my ass, but this doesn't sound like a money sink. The faucet-drain system implies that money is entering the system by being created ("minted"), but is also exiting the system by being destroyed or spent. Sitting around in inventories or banks does not destroy money. Paying NPCs to repair items, having items degrade over time, having "upkeep" (Inns, consumables like food/water), essentially "paying" the game to keep your character healthy, that's a sink.

    Maybe I'm not understanding the Galaxies system. Does the game take 10% of every trade? Do your bank accounts get taxes? That was a wonderful system in Trade Wars, every day (if you were a good alignment player) you got taxed, just like in real life, and if you were bad alignment, you were safe...except for the ISS's roaming the galaxy that would blast you on site. Can anyone tell me a little more about the Galaxies economy? Now I'm all interested...

    --trb

    1. Re:Um, no by theMerovingian · · Score: 1


      One of the biggest drains for me is the travel system - it costs between 300 and 3000 credits to go somewhere via starship. This is a 'sink', since the travel profits go back to the game (rather than the player characters).

      You also have to clone (1000 credits), insure your items (cost varies, usually about 1200 for me), repair your vehicle (between 3000 and 5000), and a couple other things.

      When you run missions and loot enemies, the game pays you money that didn't previously exist in the system.

      The trick is to balance the money being paid out with the money being reabsorbed. That way, regardless of how much is sunk in player accounts, there isn't a huge supply of new money going out which would dilute the value of each credit.

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    2. Re:Um, no by mapMonkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm not understanding the Galaxies system. Does the game take 10% of every trade? Do your bank accounts get taxes? That was a wonderful system in Trade Wars, every day (if you were a good alignment player) you got taxed, just like in real life, and if you were bad alignment, you were safe...except for the ISS's roaming the galaxy that would blast you on site. Can anyone tell me a little more about the Galaxies economy? Now I'm all interested...

      There are tons of ways that money leaves the system, although taxes are only levied against people living in cities, and I think that the money is used by the mayor to improve your city. Money leaves the game by repairing your vehicle, using the shuttle system to travel, small tax on placing items up for sale (20 credits/item), paying NPC trainers for training (although other players can train most skills for free as an alternative), taking out insurance on your items, cloning, building upkeep for housing, and getting fined by the damn nosy Stormtroopers.

    3. Re:Um, no by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Basically, the quote from Koster was a poor way of describing several money sinks in the game. Bank accounts don't have upkeep, but there is a surcharge on tipping from your bank account (as opposed to tipping people with coin out of your pocket). Player inventories don't directly have upkeep, but you do need to insure your items. Trade between players is obviously not a direct sink on the economy, but the bazaar terminal listing fee, merchant upkeep, and the aforementioned bank tip surcharge can all be ancillary to implementing trade between players.

  8. A MMORPG with no economy: by Abraxis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I understand why most online RPGs have items and money, and therefore economies...
    But I have to say that I'm really enjoying the comic book goodness of City of Heroes-- The inventory is limited to a dozen or so slots where you can store power-ups (One-time use powerups called "Inspirations", and longer term but still not permanent powerups that enhance your powers called "Enhancements").
    The only currency to speak of is "Influence"-- which can only be gained by defeatomg bad guys, and which can be used to obtain Inspirations and Enhancements to a degree...
    But the focus of the game is pretty much to get your your bad (err, "Good" I should say) super-hero self together with some super hero buddies, form a super-hero team, and go beat some evil-doer butt.
    Extremely satisfying, and delightfully free (in my opinion) of feeling like you're "level grinding". Plus, designing your very own super-hero outfit is disturbingly satisfying.

    ...to bring it back to the discussion about virtual economies, the choice of the developers in this particular game to exclude such things really, for me at least, makes the game more enjoyable, and just seems to work with the comic book theme.

    1. Re:A MMORPG with no economy: by jfdawes · · Score: 1

      Only problem is that there are no actual objects that you can interact with barring NPCs, doors and the occasional "mission objective".

      With no tangible objects, there's nothing to sell/buy. You don't even have an inventory.

      Except I'm wrong, you do have an inventory and there are "objects" - Enhancements. You can buy them and sell them (You're wrong too, Influence can also be gained by selling Enhancements). You can also trade Enhancements to other players. So there is an economy but it's very limited.

  9. its not that bad by theMerovingian · · Score: 3, Informative


    Here is some data about the real world.

    It probably sucks to start in SWG as a crafter, but I have been doing combat professions for about 5 weeks and have a decent amount of money. Most weapons on my server are less than 25k, and I can earn that much in one mission on dantooine.

    The tricks:
    1) get buffed by a master doctor
    2) get a set of good composite armor
    3) buy vasarian brandy and spice to boost your mind
    4) get a decent gun
    5) learn novice medic, and work your way up ONLY the third skill tree (buy stim packs off the bazaar)
    6) group with people more powerful than you are to run missions
    7) read the trade forums for your server, so you can understand the economy better and know who the best weapon and armorsmiths are

    This will take about 120k credits (on my server), but once you get there you're in pretty good shape.

    Alot of experienced players will pay you upwards of 1k to train you in skills (they need apprenticeship points to master their professions).

    My favorite starting combo is scout/marksman. You have to kill stuff to get marksman xp, and you have to 'harvest resources' from dead things to get scout xp. The two are pretty complimentary. Get a bundle of about 600 good quality hide (overall quality better than 500), and sell it on the bazaar for 6k.

    If you do those two things (and don't waste money on a speeder bike and clothes and stuff), you can get your composite armor and weapon in just a week or two.

    Try to master the scout and marksman professions, then you can be a bounty hunter. (I'm almost there!)

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  10. SWG improved my real life economy. by JavaLord · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The piece references an economic analysis by Raph Koster regarding Star Wars Galaxies, in which he mentions the game "...uses what is called a faucet-drain economy.

    And the faucet drains right into e-bay . I played SWG for the first month, and quit after I realized it was an annoying timesink and that Jedi were a sick marketing ploy. I had some money to play around with last month, so I bought myself a Jedi on ebay for $600. The Jedi was mislisted, so I got it pretty cheap. I played for a week, realized it was still boring (You have killed a generic monster, you gain 100 Jedi XP! Only 190000 more till you can get your next box/level!) so I relisted it on ebay. And I got $2000 for it. $1400 isn't a bad profit for a weeks work/play. Thanks for improving my real life economy Ralph. Maybe I'll see you again after pub 10 when being a Jedi is fun, or when the vehicle expansion comes out this fall.

  11. Virtual Economist by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

    Virtual economist Edward Castronova also comments

    Virtual economist?
    Is that like: "I'm not an economist, but I play one online" ?



  12. Idle characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raph is correct about unused characters skewing the statistics.
    I have a second account on SWG that consists of idle characters
    that are used only to provide extra building lots for my
    main characters.
    The characters in my main account have a fair amount of cash,
    but those in the second account are "dirt poor".