Slashdot Mirror
Linux Filesystems Benchmarked
smatt-man writes "Over at Linux Gazette they ran some tests on popular Linux filesystems (ext2, ext3, jfs, reiserfs, xfs) and the results may surprise you."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
tests on popular Linux filesystes
So did the tests come back positive or negative? Systes are nasty things, and early detection is important to increase chances of survivability.
Remember kids. Test early, and test often. You files will thank you.
Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).
Maybe slashdot needs a filesystem update to one with more powerful meta-data support like something that can detect when the same URL has been used in more than one post within a certain time. Sheesh.
That is, before it melted.
You're right, that was a total surprise.
"Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
I mean, really. "Mad about You" was a fine TV show... but this good?
How long until we see McKellenFS?
here is the winner. FAT 16
I _was_ suprised... I didn't expect that it would be a dupe :)
I've been using ext4 for a few months now and it's a surprising improvment over ext3 in terms of performance. I was surprised to see that they didn't include it in their interview. Ext4 has this to say regarding the older file systems, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman". Surprisingly, ext4 is journalled, handles larger files quite readily, and can fit a cigar vaginally in all female users of Linux. I'd highly advise all Linux geeks to try out ext4. It's a big step beyond all the other filesystems.
It's slashdot's mob tactics again. Now Taco will call their ISP and ask them "Are you SURE you don't want our protection? Certainly protecting the servers you love is worth some...compensation." If they say no, another posting of this story as soon as the admins "forget" this one.
on a global scale FAT is becoming the top health problem.
When you see bar graphs with two items its just plain silly.
Hey, he's management material! Quick promote him!
-- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
Right now I'm running reiserfs under gentoo and I recently lost some rather important data
Yeah, I get emotionally attached to my porn collection too.
Lynx.
It doesn't support GIF either though.
"Both ext versions 2 and 3 seem to reap the benefits of removing large numbers of files faster than any other file system tested." If that's not a joke, it should be.
What the heck is a 'sig'?
What about lynx, you insensitive multimedia clod!
I'm thinking of switching to something else. XFS chews too much CPU, JFS has been extremely unstable every time I've tried it (which I admit has been a while), ext3 is slow. Meh, that's why I've just stuck with Reiser. I like how fast it can delete huge directory trees and it generally performs very well except for the data loss thing.
"Yeah, it's a great car. Purrs like a kitten, decent milage. It generally performs very well... except for the brakes."
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
So if I want to trash my files XFS would be the faster, right? :-)
"I think this line is mostly filler"
Famous last word.
:wq
oh no, all those people running IE 3 can't see png, better not use it.
Snowden and Manning are heroes.
This is a post to remove the effects of my moderation to this comment. When I first moderated, earlier this morning, this comment's parent post was ranked at +4 informative and an earlier post (by 1 minute) was ranked as redundant. I moderated the earlier one up (which was fine) and this one down as Redundant (which was not fine as it violated my rule about moderating someone as redundant for a post within 5-10 minutes of the original)
Anyway, this is all part of me being anal about little things like this.
--
Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.
"Some myth ("IE don't support PNG !!!") really die hard."
Let me put it this way...
You wouldn't want your girlfriend to be faithful to you to the same degree that IE support PNG.