Slashdot Mirror


Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials

An anonymous reader writes "There's an Astrobiology.net interview up with a Vatican astronomer, Guy Consolmagno, who also curates one of the world's largest meteorite collections. On the possibility of a non-terrestrial lifeform, he says initially 'I don't know', followed by three scenarios. First, he argues: 'We find an intelligent civilization and there's no way in creation we can communicate with them because they're so alien to us. We can't talk to dolphins now. In which case, we'll never know.' Secondly, he suggests: 'We find the intelligent civilization. We can communicate.' As agents of free-will, the aliens are self-aware of good and evil, thus convertible to some terrestrial religion. Thirdly: 'We find a dozen civilizations out there, and a bunch of Jehovah's witnesses go up and convert them all.' The question of whether an alien civilization might convert Earth to their religion, or become a religion unto themselves, is left unconsidered. This compares to the many reasons people give for hosting a SETI@home client, including that ET contact would unite humanity, challenge religion, or all of the above."

1 of 1,312 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Or how about by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Redundant
    You have posted a response to one of my comments as an Anonymous Coward. The only legitimate reason to post as an anonymous coward is to protect your identity when relaying potentially comprising information. Your post does not meet that requirement, so you are receiving this pre-fabricated response.

    Your post is:

    [ ] An emotionally charged, possibly irrational response.
    [x] Attempting to call bullshit on my post.
    [x] Attempting to refute information in my post logically and intelligently.
    [ ] A troll.

    My response is:

    [ ] You have a good point. Thanks for responding.
    [x] You are misunderstanding the original post.
    [ ] You are wrong.
    [ ] Your information is wrong.
    [x] You are posting an opinion as fact, so you are wrong.
    [ ] Grow up.
    [x] You MIGHT have a point, but you're a chickenshit AC, so probably not.
    [ ] FOAD, troll.

    Other readers should:

    [ ] Use the parent link of this post to read yours.
    [x] Ignore you.
    [ ] Flame you for fun and profit.

    Moderators may optionally be instructed to:

    [ ] Mod your post up.
    [ ] Mod your post down.
    [x] Ignore your post.

    In addition, this is what I think of you personally:

    [ ] You made an interesting point and I wish I could verify your posts over time.
    [ ] Your post was stupid, and you are obviously a stupid person.
    [x] I have no opinion on you.
    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!