Rand Report Says Geospatial Data Not Big Threat
scupper writes "An article in Federal Computer Week came out Monday that announced The Rand Corporation has published a report (sponsored by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) concerning the threat that publicly available geospatial data on US Government web sites might pose in the hands of terrorists that 'found that less than one percent of the 629 federal data sets they studied appeared to have notable value to would-be attackers', according to the report titled: Mapping the Risks:Assessing the Homeland Security Implications of Publicly Available Geospatial Information. A curious 'finding' from page xxv of the summary not mentioned in the article states: 'However, we cannot conclude that publicly accessible federal geospatial information provides no special benefit to the attacker. Neither can we conclude that it would benefit the attacker.' The release of this report reminded me strangly of the Washington Post news story about a George Mason University graduate student, whose dissertation mapped critical fiber optic network infrastructure."
Just wanted to say "Hi".
Donald Duck is having a SCREAMING ORGASM right now as he maps whether or not his massive collection of Daisy Duck pr0n is a threat to national security. OMG OMG OMG>
http://gnaa.isdying.org/
This is libelous. My account was hacked and I have made amends with the webmaster of this site.
HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
Let me guess -- you're suggesting that I created the account just so I could get listed on some slashdot hate site? I don't control what some anonymous person puts up there. Why don't you start speaking your own convictions instead of beating around the bush already?
If you think that speech which is distasteful to you and offends your sensitivities should be censored, then say so. State publicly that your sensitivities are more important than the freedoms we enjoy in our society.
.
no, we're suggesting that you created the account to troll with.
and it's not about sensitivities, it's about trolls.
you are posting under this username and with that sig because you know that will offend a lot of people, has the potential to start flame wars and lead comments offtopic - all of the afformentioned being part of the definition of TROLL.
like others over at anti-slash and the like, you're just school/college kids who think they know it all but don't know shit.
good luck with your experiment of posting valid content under an offensive id. as you can see, it's not being modded down anyway, so it's working so far. well done. what exactly that has proved/achieved is another matter, but who really cares anyway.