Slashdot Mirror


SCO Caught Copying

linuxwrangler writes "While accusing everyone else of copying "their" code, SCO has meanwhile been caught copying documentation. In fact they copied several chapters of the Book of Webmin directly into their online documentation. While the book is available online, it is not licensed for redistribution. Details are sparse but it appears that SCO had to pay the publisher for using the material."

17 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. Ha by Beost · · Score: -1, Troll

    Suckers!

  2. Uh by krisp · · Score: 1, Troll

    So if they paid the publisher for the documentation, why is this even a story?

    1. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Re:Uh (Score:3, Funny)

      They didn't pay for it until someone noticed. Very underhanded.


      HOW IS THIS FUCKING FUNNY?

      It isn't you idiot slashfuckboys.

    2. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Linux Torvols.

      Torvols. Geez, get a brain, moran! :-)

  3. Ahh, too easy... by Golgafrinchan · · Score: -1, Troll

    People in glass houses... yada yada yada.

    --
    My userid is prime!
  4. Yeah! by Jhawkeye83 · · Score: -1, Troll

    Yeah more SCO just what I needed. Almost didn't get my weekley alotment.

    --
    Quality over Quantity.http://www.virusgaming.com/
  5. Obligatory STTNG reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hoist by their own Picard!

  6. SCO, royalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    If sco already paid to use the matieral in their docs, then this story smacks of infantile finger pointing based on a half-cocked submitter.

  7. Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Is this post a: a) troll
    b) flaimbait? SCO is right to defend the IP that it owns, how dare you linux zealots question their authority?
    c) Insightful I wonder if the employees responsible for this were involved in the layoffs at all, they should have been.
    d) Funny Next thing ya know they are going to have illegal copies of Darl McBride's new business book, "How to Succeed in Business Without Really Working"
    e) FP!

  8. Ambiguous licensing? by Sarojin · · Score: -1, Troll

    As seen on this google cache of an older version of the webmin documentation, it's kind of ambiguous to whether and how you can redistribute it. We should consider this incident apart from SCO's recent doings, to be fair.

    --
    HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
  9. Best Poast Evar!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Feh! SCO is old news. They will be dead in less than two years and Darl will be getting his ass reamed on a constant basis by big Bubba in federal prison. Darl McBride will be made to have forced homosexual in jail.

    1. Re:Best Poast Evar!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      No. I meant that he'd be forced homosexual in jail. It's as plain as the nose on yer face idjut!! Gul durnit!!! If'n it ain't broke, then it don't need fixed!!!

  10. Re:The Real Point by Sarojin · · Score: -1, Troll

    If you expect companies to follow the copyright of the GPL, you should support the RIAA going after infringers of its copyright. If not, you're a hypocrite.

    --
    HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
  11. Re:ownership by Planesdragon · · Score: 0, Troll

    No. Did you even read the summary?

    SCO apparantly paid for the docs. Which means that they're as free and clear as if they hired a tech writier to write new docs and license them to SCO.

  12. Ahhhhh hahahahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Ahhhhh hahahahahahaha

    wheeewwww... Priceless

  13. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The kettle calls the POT black!

  14. Re:Oi, reminds me... by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fuck you.

    --
    Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton