A Snag For Verisign's Suit Against ICANN
Dinglenuts writes "Looks like Verisign just received a setback in their lawsuit against ICANN. Verisign sued ICANN for making them take down Sitefinder, but the judge said that their case was 'awfully vague.' The extensive mischief caused by Verisign's new attempts at 'service' have been well documented on Slashdot."
Reader Mz6 points out the same AP story as carried by USA Today.
IANAL but ICANN doesn't give IPs, IANA does. So PTIYPASI. HTH, HAND.
"The extensive mischief caused by Verisign's new attempts at 'service' have been well documented on Slashdot."
A sad day for justice will come when rantings of us lab monkeys will be used as evidence in court.
-Grump
Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
Poor VeriSign! They can't hijack the internet anymore. :(
Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
"Verisign sued ICANN for making them take down Sitefinder, but the judge said that their case was 'awfully vague.'"
Hey!, I'm in a smartass mood today, WTF is wrong with "awfully vague?" It seems to work for the DMCA and a lot of other bogus legislation.
Chuck
Don't worry, I just bought lkwdlgkhlhkgwq.com and I'm going to mirror the old sitefinder page. Just as a service to those who were missing it.
--
RumorsDaily
All of the defense's evidence is preceded by the phrase: 'I am not a lawyer.'
but just incase Yahoo gets slashdotted, there's always USA Today to hammer on next!
Hmmm.
"Don't worry, I just bought lkwdlgkhlhkgwq.com and I'm going to mirror the old sitefinder page. Just as a service to those who were missing it."
;)
Please remove the lkwdlgkhlhkgwq.com domain, as it preys on the users of my site, lkwdlgkhlhkgwg.com. If the results of past cybersquatting cases are any indication, I believe I have a pretty good case
--
www.nitemarecafe.com
There's a town in Wales that's going to be pissed you bought up their name.