Feds to Open BlackBoxVoting User Logs?
Doc Ruby writes "Investigating a crack of eVoting company VoteHere, the FBI is said to be issuing a subpoena for the traffic logs of journalist Beverly Harris' BlackBoxVoting website. The FBI is pursuing Harris on the theory that her site is the connection between incriminating memos leaked from (VoteHere competitor) Diebold and the intrusion into VoteHere's servers. Are you on the list?"
Thanks for the link, you dirty rotten #%@&@$#!!
Glad I gave up cracking for Lent. I wouldn't want THE MAN to rain on my parade.
Nice way to give the feds a bit more work, slashdot the site, fill up the logs pretty good...
"Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
There is a difference you know. With a warrant, jack boot thugs kick in your door and take what they want. With a subpoena, they simply hold a gun to your head and ask nicely ;-)
Congratulations!
You just made the list!
Now you are; shouldn't have clicked that link.
They might, just might, be looking for evidence against Diebold while they are investigating the "break-in".
Jaysyn
There is a war going on for your mind.
From the VoteHere site (http://votehere.com/vhti.html):
"VHTi proves that electronic voting machines worked correctly and did not cheat in every election. "
So . . . only in a few elections?
The founding fathers just broke mach-1
How do you go mach -1? Backwards?
I was about to correct you, but it seems both I and the last poster were taught wrong. I checked your link, and verified by digging up several others. You do indeed add 's to non-plural possesive nouns like James's.
Nothing makes me madder than discovering that along the way, one of my teachers drilled the wrong thing into me. We all depend on what we were taught in things like grammar. Unlike math, there's no "going back to first principles" or "proving it for yourself." If we were taught wrong, we end up making fools of ourselves later,. Of course, it might help if we paid teachers more than a pittance, or if more than a tiny fraction of students cared, but that's another gripe for another time.
And then, of course, there's the possibility that all three sites I checked on the 'net are wrong-- lord knows the internet isn't exactly edited for accuracy. For now, I'll just have to take your word for it.
My name is 63.161.169.137, and I approve this message.
Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
How do you go mach -1? Backwards?
You have to use something that sucks faster than the speed of sound.
I am now.
;)
Lets see how the feds handle a slashdotting log
This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.