Slashdot Mirror


FTC Porn Spam Regulation Now in Effect

gManZboy writes "The AP (through Yahoo) is reporting that the FTC is now requiring that all sexually explicit spam carry the wholly original 'SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT:' moniker in the subject line. I don't know why the porn industry is complaining about this, it seems like now everyone who really wants porn spam (not I!) can finally create a filter that delivers it to their inbox, highlighted, and bolded!" The FTC's regulation is available, and so is Slashdot's earlier story.

7 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First Post!!!

    1. Re:SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Heh! Can't even Frost Pist properly.

      Shame on you.

  2. SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I'm a eunuch, you insensitive spam-clod!!

  3. Re:Sexually Explicit: (Does this apply to posts to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    it posts where the link is pointing too now, ass-hole. it baffles me why people like you think it is funny to link to that nastiness. Grow up, or get off-line. I swear you are acting no better than the spammers we are discussing here.

  4. Re:Sexually Explicit: (Does this apply to posts to by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wasn't that shut down recently?

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  5. In other news: by Badanov · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The Bill Z. Bubb Road Maintenance Company is working hard to clear things out after hell freezes over and a slashdot editor comes out in favor of content filtering.

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  6. Re:Sexually Explicit: (Does this apply to posts to by nizo · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Ahh so they goatse guy moved. Thank you so very much for letting me start my day with that image burned into my memory.