Alternatives to Autoconf?

Despairing Developer queries: "Once autoconf was a great way to make widely portable programs. But now when you have to spend more time sorting out incompatibilities between autoconf versions, breaking battles between autoconf compatibility wrappers and configure.in compatibility functions that tries to outsmart each other, and on top of that see the list of dependencies increase (it's not that fun to compile perl on unicos) and performance diving rapidly, what is your escape plan? Is there a drop in replacement for autoconf? Is there something else out there that is as portable as autoconf to use instead?"

Comments

Two awful suggestions

[sofar]

they may be a drop in replacement for developers, but for packagers and people trying to track changes and new versions, both cmake and scons (blender!) are horrible. They cost us (A group of 10 people working on a distro) enormous amount of extra time (blender's upgrade to .33 took me a whole day to figure out, whereas before it only takes me 20 minutes to fully test a new blender version).

all in all autoconf maybe a problem for developers, but for packagers it is still *by* *far* the best.

Re:mod article up!

[noselasd]

Try pkg-config --list-all
pkg-config provides you with compiler/linker/preprocessor flags for
compiling a program that uses various libraries.
Now, if only all libraries provided a .pc file..

Try PMK, for example

[wsapplegate]

You can find it at pmk.sourceforge.net

Or else, you can have a look at A-A-P, by nobody else than Bram Moolenaar, the author of the One True Editor, a.k.a. ViM :-)

There is also Package-framework, by Tom Lord, the author of the infamous Arch SCM.

I was about to mention SCons, too, but other people already did (it always pay to check other comments just before posting, especially on /. :-)

To sum it up : there is no shortage of alternatives to the incredibly hairy Autoconf/Automake nightmare. The problem is, people are still using them for the very same reason they use CVS instead of Arch/Subversion, or Sendmail instead of Postfix/Exim : because they're considered ``standard'' tools, and people feel more comfortable with software they know to be used by plenty of other people (millions of programmers can't all be wrong. Can they ?). I really hope they'll stop making this kind of mistakes soon, so I won't need to curse them everytime I have to debug some Autoconf breakage...